No --- YOU missed MY point --- we'd be calling each other 'bloke' and 'gentlemen', and having 'donnybrooks' and the like. In addition, we'd be on the metric system and the Celsius Scale.
This is regional differences. In northern England for example, there is a tendency to omit definite and indefinite articles altogether. This does not mean they speak another language,
That's right --- and if I said we'd all be speaking Texan if Texas took over the country, people would know what I'm talking about.
They'd know you would, for some reason, speak with a Texan accent (presumably, you think that a person's accent is determined by the accent of their leaders), but they would also know that Texan is still English. Language is a nested hierarchy, just as taxonomy is.
And yet you miss my point
again. I was demonstrating that Texan is a dialect of English. There is no 'US' accent, just as there is no 'British' accent. There are styles of writing that dominate Britain, and styles that dominate the US.
Right-o, old chap! Now tell me WHY the comma goes there. If British and English are the same (but for syntax), this should be no problem, eh?
The comma goes there because is where the comma went in the time it was written. Things change, y'know. In English grammar, both British and US, the phrase is parsed correctly without a comma.
I don't quite see what you are getting at here.
And I think we've all had enough of your 'Look at me, I can speak British, tally-ho, pip-pip' antics. I find it offensive, and, frankly, you look like an ignorant child, not to mention that you've
completely derailed the thread.