Oi vey -thanks to whoever gave all those Reps. Your details are not shown on my User CP interface so I cannot thank you direct!
Upvote
0
I wish I would have saved all the threads started just on "hell" that were on the now "defunct" GA board.....I think Hell gets confused with Heck. People who don't believe in Gosh are darned to Heck. But that's for another thread....
Surely, if universalism is true and all will be reconciled to G_d eventually, what is the point of having CF. There is absolutely no need for debate or concern about anything to do with G_d because he will save us all, regardless. We may as well just do and say whatever we wish in our lives because it will make no difference ultimately!
If what you desire to do is wickedness and you only turn from it due to fear, then you've got a long way to go with your transformation!
I'm not saying God won't chasten you beyond this life. I think He does. One can also be resurrected to judgment. While it seems from Scripture that, no matter what it takes or how long it takes, God will get everyone clean and belonging to Him, it also seems a shame to have to come such a hard way as some will have to take.
A friend of mine from South Africa, Bernie Kruger, posted this (excerpted) in answer to your question:
The problem once hell is removed from the equation, "what are we saved from then?" or "That gives me licence to live as I please etc."
Anyone who comes up with those kinds of question have only Fire Insurance
The saved from what comes from the very first verse in Matt that speaks about save.
"..to save His people from their sins" Mat 1:23
If you think UR or CU as we call it gives licence to sin, be my guest, go sin, go do drugs, go to the brothels, don't use a condom, drink excessive amounts of alcohol, go beat up your wife and kids, sexually molest children, go rob a convenience store, beat up some ol lady tramp, drive under the influence of alcohol or drugs, kill someone in this state.
Go on go live the good life.
Hmm, does not sound too enticing does it?
Yes sin has consequences. All of the the "good life" examples illustrated above, have consequences in the here and now. Now even and Atheist would likely not do these things. Drugs will kill you eventually, promiscuity will lead to venereal diseases, excessive alcohol consumption; cirrhosis of the liver, and the rest a hefty fine, suspension or more likely jail time. Does that sound like the good life?
No, I guess not.
See that is what Jesus came to save us from, the consequences of our sins. Through His Holy Spirit we are able to overcome our weaknesses.
If fear of Eternal Torment is the only reason you serve Jesus then you are a false disciple, a pious one at best and most likely one that has a measure of self righteousness. Read up on the Pharisees, see how Jesus dealt with their attitudes, they all thought they had it right and most of the hell verses Jesus speaks of is in direct correlation to them, the pious, righteous, whitewashed tombs.
I apologise if this sounds harsh, but anyone needing hell to be real, does not know the true heart of our Father.
Is it not ironic, the books on hell that reinforce the pious and self righteous views of salvation are such hot sellers? Why are the heaven visions not so popular? See where I am going with this, there is a verse that explains this:
Pro 23:6 Eat thou not the bread of him that hath an evil eye, neither desire thou his dainty meats:
Pro 23:7a For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he:
................................................
I would add that the gospel is about the love of God, which is how Jesus said you would know His disciples: by their love one for another. Scripture also says, "Fear is not in love,but perfect love is casting out fear, for fear has chastening. Now he who is fearing is not perfected in love." (1 John 4:18)
Is it not ironic, the books on hell that reinforce the pious and self righteous views of salvation are such hot sellers? Why are the heaven visions not so popular? See where I am going with this, there is a verse that explains this:
Universalist theology belongs down in general apologetics or somewhere else for non-christian discussion.
Oh puhleese.
"In 2005 Cardinal Murphy O'Connor, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Westminster, reiterated that Universal Salvation was entirely compatible with Catholic teaching and expressed his personal hope for universal salvation."
Catholics belong in unorthodox, too, then, according to their ever-changing, watered-down, compromising beliefs that lack spiritual understanding.
The crux of these matters between us ALL is that we are to LOVE ALL of our neighbors as ourselves.
This is THE LAW and THE PROPHETS and you would be 'wise' to find that understanding with your fellow mankind.
Faith 'works' THROUGH love.
Got sum?
enjoy!
squint
Yeah, just get the forums right. I'm all for an UR icon! We don't need the grief added to us that comes from the their aberrant doctrine.
If I see their icon, I can make my decision to obey God, and do right...
Neighbours?
Oh, yeah. We should all paste BIG LABELS over our heads so we KNOW how utterly DIVIDED we ALL are.
Luke 10:29
But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, "And who is my neighbor?"
Sound familiar?