Bob, it doesn't take any rocket science to see that Gen. 1 clearly states that Adam was created after the animals, and that 2 says he was created before, and that this is a major contradiction. and that this is a contradiction. That is one of the reasons why biblical scholarship argues for two authors here.1. They are not two acccounts - but rather one account.
2. there are no chapters in the actual text.
3. There is no time-boxed chronological sequence in Genesis 2.
4. There is no statement in Genesis two saying "after God created man - he then created animals".
5. By contrast in Genesis 1 - on days 5 and 6 God created animals in a time-boxed chronological sequence - and ends day 6 with the creation of mankind - all on the same "evening and morning". --
It doesn't take rocket science to see a major contradiction the points you merely 'assume' in a chapter that has no time-boxed chronological sequence at all. In fact nothing at all is stated in Genesis 2 for the details in terms of how many decades, centuries, millennia... for the time you need Genesis 1.
Now, if you have some insight that will just dazzle the rest of us into erasing the contradictions between your own assumptions vs the facts in the actual chapters, let's hear it.
Also the situation with Daniel is instructive as it also demonstrates Hebrew writings styles - with the same Chiastic structure and the same 'expand and enlarge' pattern that adds details to the picture the way we do today with transparencies laid on top of each other.
I am not sure what particular perspective you are coming from but the problem I have is that nothing you say correlates in any way, shape, or form with modern biblical scholarship. The latter openly recognizes and stresses there are contradictions in Scripture, including the reverse order in Genesis. Since Day I, scholars have raised issues about the contradictions, the Mosaic authorship, etc. The church took an irrational stance and either told scholars to shut up or came up with all sorts if ridiculous pseudo-solutions to gloss over the contradictions. A famous o ne is the church going so far as to insert the words "brother of Goliath, " into the 2 Sam. 21:19 account, in order to gloss over the contradiction between this account and the one which claims David killed Goliath. But, in Hebrew, 2 Sam. says Elhanan killed Goliath, no "brother of." As scholars became free of the oppressive hand of the church, they were able to conduct an objective scientific inquiry Scripture, which reached conclusions challenging deeply held assumptions.
Today, there is a major town-gown riff between the scholars and the church. Many believers, and I am sure this is true of you, live in the world of a folk or Sunday-school apologetic. That's OK. However, the world of serious biblical scholarship is light years distant from you. And that is the approach I am working from. Hence, your views fail to satisfy.
Upvote
0