Peanut butter and apple?! That sounds horrible!
Don't be ridiculous. PB&A is a delicious, nutritious combination.
Upvote
0
Peanut butter and apple?! That sounds horrible!
Your friend brings you an apple that was created ex nihilo into the palm of his hand.
What scientific evidence would satisfy this fact?
To show that there is no known scientific evidence that supports creatio ex nihilo.
Indeed -- it's more of an attitude than an answer, though.Who cares? Does that answer your challenge?
That doesn't mean it didn't happen.No scientific evidence supports magical space pixies, either.
See a connection?
No -- I'm asking you guys a very specific and, in my opinion, scientific question.Perhaps you should ask the people who instructed you to take the bible literally?
I'm sure you think it is.*staff edit*
No, thanks.You live in a dream world where for you the impossible is possible, perhaps it would be for the best if you didn't try and bring your dreams into the light, they just make people think you're a whoopsy.
No, thanks.
I'm not going to sit idly by, while the Science Inquisition tells us their computers say the Creation Event or the Flood could not have happened, without challenging it for specifics.
No, thanks.
I'm not going to sit idly by, while the Science Inquisition tells us their computers say the Creation Event or the Flood could not have happened, without challenging it for specifics.
You're a little ahead of yourself.HAHA project much. The western world already had a inquisition and it was preformed by Christians.
You're a little ahead of yourself.
Read John 9 and tell me scientists wouldn't do the same thing today.
If scientists put that poor boy through the 3rd degree then, they sure aren't exempt from doing it again -- only worse.*
* Due to what is called the Scientific Method.
Sorry, but it's God's own Creation itself, as signed off by God, that has shown us that the Biblical Creation account along with the Biblical Flood story never happened.No, thanks.
I'm not going to sit idly by, while the Science Inquisition tells us their computers say the Creation Event or the Flood could not have happened, without challenging it for specifics.
Yes, AVET. We all agree with you... so what?To show that there is no known scientific evidence that supports creatio ex nihilo.
When we ask specific follow up questions about the apple, you get all upset and defensive. Or you simply say "it doesn't matter." How do you expect us to answer your question, then?But when I ask, "What scientific evidence would satisfy an apple being created ex nihilo?" you ex-nihilo deniers stand around scratching your heads like kindergartners taking an algebra exam.
Suddenly, you guys aren't the hot-shot science-talkers you'd like us to think you are -- are you?
The problem you and your ilk have is that you use your "heart" to answer questions about reality, rather than only questions about emotions.For once, you have to actually answer from your heart -- (instead of your brains) -- and "idiotic" automatically regurgitates -- doesn't it?
Christian geologists already figured out there wasn't any global flood back in the early 19th century, before there were any computers. But, you like to pretend you don't know that. Sorry, AVET... there is no conspiracy against creationism... and no "scientific inquisition (*sniff*)."I'm not going to sit idly by, while the Science Inquisition tells us their computers say the Creation Event or the Flood could not have happened, without challenging it for specifics.
Ah yes.... now random "neighbors" of the cured guy from John 9 are labeled as "scientists." Why?.... because they did something you don't like... therefore they are "scientists." However, I think I have you, AVET. If the same events occurred today, he would be lying, wouldn't he? Afterall, in the current "dispensation," Jesus doesn't go around healing anyone.... isn't that correct?You're a little ahead of yourself.
Read John 9 and tell me scientists wouldn't do the same thing today.
If scientists put that poor boy through the 3rd degree then, they sure aren't exempt from doing it again -- only worse. Due to what is called the Scientific Method.
I'd ask you to name one of these Christian geologists, but I really don't care who it was.Christian geologists already figured out there wasn't any global flood back in the early 19th century, before there were any computers.
I'd ask you to name one of these Christian geologists, but I really don't care who it was.
The fact is, if maybe one or two did, they had to step on the Scriptures to do so.
Instead of giving God the credit for cleaning up after the Flood and putting things decently and in order, they assume Mother Nature did it.
Again, assuming they were Christian geologists.
Well, no wonder -- look @ this garbage:I'm sure you read this already: History of the Collapse of Flood Geology and a Young Earth
So, now you can claim they weren't "really" Christians.... correct?
Then comes this:The cosmogonists generally avoided the insurmountable problems of animal distribution and migration, for instance, and resisted determinations that geological strata are not arranged in order of specific gravity. On the other hand, the theorists were for the most part committed to providing honest scientific accounts of physical processes associated with the flood, and they resisted making appeals to miracle in order to resolve difficulties in those accounts.
... and I say they got what they deserved.In the end, the old diluvial cosmogonies fell victim to their own success.
Well, no wonder -- look @ this garbage:
Then comes this:
... and I say they got what they deserved.
You just can't get over your glaring inability to define reality for the rest of the world, can you, AV? No matter how many times you tell it to take a hike, it just hangs around, making you feel small.