ThisBrotherOfHis
Well-Known Member
- Dec 17, 2013
- 1,444
- 115
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Scripture has no application to those who are predestined to be saved and none to those who are predestined to hell. If a person predestined to damnation kept every law and precept and followed every teaching of Scripture exactly as written, he would still be damned to hell because God is sovereign and has predestined him to hell before the foundations of the earth. On the other hand, all the teachings and commands and warnings of Scripture are meaningless to those predestined to be saved. They will be saved whether or not they keep such teachings and commands and whether or not they take heed to the warnings of Scripture.
Also, Jesus’ sacrificial death and resurrection are also meaningless. Salvation is not really dependent upon Jesus’ atoning death. Salvation is really only dependent on being predestined to be saved. If you are not predestined to be saved, you cannot be, no matter how much you want to, no matter how much you believe in the atoning death and sacrifice of Jesus for the forgiveness of sins and seek to follow him as your Lord.
Some will argue that one predestined to hell cannot possibly keep every law and precept, or follow every teaching of Scripture. If predestination was what many claim it to be, that would be true. But it isn't. Why? Because of the second part of the scenario outlined above. There are obviously those who state a love and confession of Christ and live like hell anyway. "Then they aren't Christians!" Really? How do you know. Only God can read a heart. Regardless of how you see someone, regardless of how certain you are of his or her destiny, the simple truth is you don't know, and can't know. No one made you judge of anyone -- yet.
Some will say, "Well, hyper-Calvinists may believe that way, but I'm a Calvinist and I don't." Well, you should. Because the doctrine of predestination insists you must. If one is predestined prior to birth of one's eternal destination, then all of the above is true.
Problem: It is utterly inconsistent with Scripture, so the Calvinists came up with other doctrines to try to soften what is said above. But the essence of what is related above remains true, notwithstanding all the peripheral arguments advanced. Naturally some Calvinists say that the person predestined to salvation will persevere to the end, and will accept and have faith in the Lord Jesus and in his sacrificial death for the remission of sins. But it obviously is not the critical question, is it? The critical question remains whether or not the person is predestined to salvation or damnation.
Predestination is not what Calvinists believe it is. The only absolute definition of "predestination" is in Romans 8:29.
Acts 4:28 speaks of the death of Christ for the sins of the world as having been "predestined."
Romans 8:30 is an extension of v. 29.
1 Corinthians 2:7 speaks of the wisdom being preached at that time as having been predestined by God to be revealed.
Ephesians 1:5 speaks of us collectively as the church being adopted as sons, the result of our faith, as having been predestined.
Ephesians 1:11 speaks of us collectively as the church working the will of His good purpose in us as being predestined.
In Ephesians 1:4, we see Paul state that "He chose us in Him before the foundations of the world." Calvinists love to point to that as the definitive statement that our salvation was, indeed predestined before creation was even accomplished. But that's not what the passage says.
It says, "just as He chose us" -- collectively, the church -- "before the foundations of the world" He also predestined us to adoption. That's not the same thing as choosing us for salvation while choosing others for condemnation. It speaks of God's predestination to preserve a remnant. He has preserved a remnant of Israel. He preserves a remnant of us, the non-Jewish believers, as well.
Calvinists like to make their arguments long, convoluted and repetitious. But no matter how much they attempt to prove their point, they are mistaken. The best rule of thumb is, the simplest explanation is the best, and likely the most right. So it is with what the Bible clearly says about predestination.
Also, Jesus’ sacrificial death and resurrection are also meaningless. Salvation is not really dependent upon Jesus’ atoning death. Salvation is really only dependent on being predestined to be saved. If you are not predestined to be saved, you cannot be, no matter how much you want to, no matter how much you believe in the atoning death and sacrifice of Jesus for the forgiveness of sins and seek to follow him as your Lord.
Some will argue that one predestined to hell cannot possibly keep every law and precept, or follow every teaching of Scripture. If predestination was what many claim it to be, that would be true. But it isn't. Why? Because of the second part of the scenario outlined above. There are obviously those who state a love and confession of Christ and live like hell anyway. "Then they aren't Christians!" Really? How do you know. Only God can read a heart. Regardless of how you see someone, regardless of how certain you are of his or her destiny, the simple truth is you don't know, and can't know. No one made you judge of anyone -- yet.
Some will say, "Well, hyper-Calvinists may believe that way, but I'm a Calvinist and I don't." Well, you should. Because the doctrine of predestination insists you must. If one is predestined prior to birth of one's eternal destination, then all of the above is true.
Problem: It is utterly inconsistent with Scripture, so the Calvinists came up with other doctrines to try to soften what is said above. But the essence of what is related above remains true, notwithstanding all the peripheral arguments advanced. Naturally some Calvinists say that the person predestined to salvation will persevere to the end, and will accept and have faith in the Lord Jesus and in his sacrificial death for the remission of sins. But it obviously is not the critical question, is it? The critical question remains whether or not the person is predestined to salvation or damnation.
Predestination is not what Calvinists believe it is. The only absolute definition of "predestination" is in Romans 8:29.
Romans 8, NASB
29 For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brethren;
He says through Paul that the ones who are predestined to become conformed to the image of God are those He foreknew. Foreknowledge is not predestination. It is simply "knowledge beforehand" -- that is the definition of the Greek proginosko. That is all it means. There are only five other verses that use the word proorizo,"to decide beforehand."29 For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brethren;
Acts 4:28 speaks of the death of Christ for the sins of the world as having been "predestined."
Romans 8:30 is an extension of v. 29.
1 Corinthians 2:7 speaks of the wisdom being preached at that time as having been predestined by God to be revealed.
Ephesians 1:5 speaks of us collectively as the church being adopted as sons, the result of our faith, as having been predestined.
Ephesians 1:11 speaks of us collectively as the church working the will of His good purpose in us as being predestined.
In Ephesians 1:4, we see Paul state that "He chose us in Him before the foundations of the world." Calvinists love to point to that as the definitive statement that our salvation was, indeed predestined before creation was even accomplished. But that's not what the passage says.
It says, "just as He chose us" -- collectively, the church -- "before the foundations of the world" He also predestined us to adoption. That's not the same thing as choosing us for salvation while choosing others for condemnation. It speaks of God's predestination to preserve a remnant. He has preserved a remnant of Israel. He preserves a remnant of us, the non-Jewish believers, as well.
Calvinists like to make their arguments long, convoluted and repetitious. But no matter how much they attempt to prove their point, they are mistaken. The best rule of thumb is, the simplest explanation is the best, and likely the most right. So it is with what the Bible clearly says about predestination.
Last edited:
Upvote
0