sfs
Senior Member
- Jun 30, 2003
- 10,742
- 7,764
- 64
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Incorrect. It a conclusion based on the evidence, which is exactly what we would expect to see if the theory is true. That's how we tell what's true -- we look at reality.This is a conclusion based on an theory that mutations accumulate over millions of years.
Concluded from evidence.How do you know it was an ape that lived 7 million years ago? Is this confirmed or assumed?
I supplied an article about evidence from mutations for common descent. Your question was not relevant, and yes, I know of positive mutations.Brother you supplied an article about common descent and mutations. My question is relevant.
Because of genetic and fossil data.7 million is quite a specific number, how is this number certain/verified and why not 10 million or 13.578 million?
The evidence you just read and are currently not explaining.How do you know this? What evidence do you have that proves it was caused by mutation?
A mutation is any change to genetic material. If two organisms have identical DNA and one of them experiences a mutation, it now is genetically different from the first.In case i have misunderstood, could you please explain to me how genetic differences are produced by mutations?
By mutating repeatedly.How does a shared ancestor dna mutate into 2 different species?
No. It means nothing remotely like that.Does this mean that because the 2 charts are similar, i can procreate with a healthy chimp the same as i can procreate with a healthy and different human?
Huh? I want you to tell me why human and chimpanzee DNA looks like it is different because of mutations.In case i do.not understand. Why?
Upvote
0