Question begging, but do tell us about the intelligence in God's design of the hyena's female reproductive tract.
And the creationist hypothesis is -
POOF from dust of the ground?
Please present your evidence and the proposed mechanism by which the POOFer turned silicates into cytochromes.
Makes baby hyena's just fine......Question begging, but do tell us about the intelligence in God's design of the hyena's female reproductive tract.
You asked someone yesterday if they have a background in biology, etc. Do you?How so?
You asked someone yesterday if they have a background in biology, etc. Do you?
I do.
I watched the video. I've seen similar videos and essays before. It is hyperbole and the unwarranted extension of metaphor. If you had the background that you ask of others, you would see this.
The gut is the gut. It is not a brain, nor a second brain, nor an indication of intelligence. That gut flora and activity can alter your mood, etc., is a function of feedback mechanisms and the influence of gut-related hormones on other parts of the body.
Well, I'm sold! Let's throw out evolutionism!
So what now? How do we explain the diversity of life on Earth? Or should we just not think about it too much?
We should. The Cambrian Explosion was discovered by an evolutionist and quickly discarded because it didn't fit ToE. Yet, it's the best evidence of creation and no evolution.
The problem is that there is no such thing as an irreducible part. Please see my signature for a concise view on ID.ID is based on irreducible parts. It could be some other intelligence designed it.
Only a cretin would post that with serious intent. I don't think you are cretin, so the most probable conclusion is that you are trolling.With those espousing evolutionary beliefs, it is quite difficult for me to tell between those seriously believing evolutionism is a science and all this requires (e.g. abiogenesis, spontaneous generation etc.), and those here just to have a little laugh about how absurd evolutionism really is.
Day 5.5, God spent 30 million years creating small Shelly sea fauna, and it was good.
. Where the heck do you get your information from ?!?!?! That was the weirdest, most erroneous screed I’ve ever read from you .It's interesting you do not quote the science, so allow me. The Cambrian Explosipn is how every current complex phylum appeared all together at one time in the fossil record. This contradicts what Charles Darwin hypothesized with his ToE of long time and slow, slow, slow evolution of lifeforms. The Darwinists went uh, uh, uh as they were dumbfounded. They stated that this was 540 million years ago and claimed it was the Big Bang of life.
I should put in a disclaimer here that significant new forms of life came into existence, but only sponges (SpongeBobSquarePants?) did not appear.
Furthermore, there is not fossilized evidence of life, except for sponges, just below the Cambrian layer. Atheist scientists claim this is due to contamination. Above the Cambrian layer, no new species ever appears.
It's no wonder the finder, Charles Walcott of the Smithsonian Institute, put it under wraps.
It's interesting you do not quote the science, so allow me. The Cambrian Explosipn is how every current complex phylum appeared all together at one time in the fossil record. This contradicts what Charles Darwin hypothesized with his ToE of long time and slow, slow, slow evolution of lifeforms. The Darwinists went uh, uh, uh as they were dumbfounded. They stated that this was 540 million years ago and claimed it was the Big Bang of life.
I should put in a disclaimer here that significant new forms of life came into existence, but only sponges (SpongeBobSquarePants?) did not appear.
Furthermore, there is not fossilized evidence of life, except for sponges, just below the Cambrian layer. Atheist scientists claim this is due to contamination. Above the Cambrian layer, no new species ever appears.
It's no wonder the finder, Charles Walcott of the Smithsonian Institute, put it under wraps.
. Where the heck do you get your information from ?!?!?! That was the weirdest, most erroneous screed I’ve ever read from you .
It happened over tens of millions of years... in addition, I'm not sure you realise what the life at the start of the Cambrian was like. It isn't anything like what we have today, not even fish.What the internet atheists here do not understand historical or forensic science? It's the science that most of evolution is based on.
What it means is the Cambrian Explosion debunks evolution based on the fossil record. It's that simple. If evolution was true, then we would not find the appearance and diversification of most major living animal phyla in one time interval.
Please can you post evidence of the female hyenas not thinking so? Call me a Doubting Thomas, but I don't believe you've ever spoken to even a single female hyena to ask her opinion, much less have one answer.The females hyenas don’t think so . It causes a lot of problems when they give birth .
Ummmm. Serious?Only a cretin would post that with serious intent. I don't think you are cretin, so the most probable conclusion is that you are trolling.
I have a more positive views of cretins thant trolls. Just saying.
Well, I'm sold! Let's throw out evolutionism!
So what now? How do we explain the diversity of life on Earth? Or should we just not think about it too much?
Stop waisting your time and get on your knees praying, nothing else matters. Not space exploration, not the development of cleaner energies or new medicines. Nothing can be won by anything except repentance and then a quick death so you can get to heaven.
spontaneous generation IS pseudoscience. This is what Pasteur disproved. Abiogenesis is a new field of study and there is a lot of current research being done . Don’t mix up your science terminology! Creationist organizations use different definitions to confuse laymen.
I read there were some problems, but hey, what do you expect with such a hideous beast?Makes baby hyena's just fine......
Please can you post evidence of the female hyenas not thinking so? Call me a Doubting Thomas, but I don't believe you've ever spoken to even a single female hyena to ask her opinion, much less have one answer.
Below is a picture of a hyena. With an animal so ugly, is it really much of a surprise that the females look like males? And however is ugliness a proof of evolution?
View attachment 241369
Ummmm. Serious?Lol. See below for some examples of possible Poes or true-believers (I still can't tell). However you legitimate believers in evolutionism keep me guessing, I do admire your faith, as Evolutionism is something that has been falsified time, after time, after time...
Lol. If Charlie Darwin were alive today, and his bulldog Thomas Huxtable, given all the evidence to the contrary, I think even these pseudoscientists would recant their Evolutionism and become Christians.
I read there were some problems, but hey, what do you expect with such a hideous beast?
Maybe if their females were more feminine, they wouldn't have these problems?Damn you really seem to hate hyenas, don't you? Remember that beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
I think they are magnificent animals and do not deserve such a painful and problematic pregnancy.
It's interesting you do not quote the science, so allow me.
The Cambrian Explosion was discovered by an evolutionist
and quickly discarded because it didn't fit ToE.
Yet, it's the best evidence of creation and no evolution.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?