I'm attempting to duplicate Thomas Young's famous double slit experiment using a laser pointer and some household items, and was wondering if anyone had any suggestions. Rather than using those expensive glass double slit slides, I've attempting to use an edge-on playing card with mixed results. Any thoughts on possible ways of setting up the apparatus?
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Young's double slit experiment
- Thread starter OneLastBreath
- Start date
michabo
reason, evidence
Playing cards? Not with a laser.
The equation is: lambda / s = x / D, with
lambda = wavelength,
s = slit separation
x = distance between bands
D = distance from slits to detector
If you have a red light laser, lambda is roughly 700nm (700*10^-9m). If you want to see the diffraction, let's say x = 0.01m, D = 10m (if you're indoors). That would mean s= 700*10^-9m * 10m / 0.01m = 0.0007m = 0.7mm. That's pretty tiny. I think you would have a hard time constructing this by hand.
The equation is: lambda / s = x / D, with
lambda = wavelength,
s = slit separation
x = distance between bands
D = distance from slits to detector
If you have a red light laser, lambda is roughly 700nm (700*10^-9m). If you want to see the diffraction, let's say x = 0.01m, D = 10m (if you're indoors). That would mean s= 700*10^-9m * 10m / 0.01m = 0.0007m = 0.7mm. That's pretty tiny. I think you would have a hard time constructing this by hand.
Upvote
0
Hmm...I don't recall where I originally saw the suggestion to use some sort of divider (i.e. the playing card) rather than two slits, but the writer seemed to be convinced it worked just fine. I am familiar with that equation, I was just curious to see if anyone had any suggestions as to how to apply it in order to make a (relatively) simple set-up for performing the experiment.
Upvote
0
michabo
reason, evidence
I'd say take a playing card and an exacto knife and cut a series of vertical bars as close together as you can, stand the card about 10-15m from a wall, and slowly shine the laser over the slits and see what happens. You may be able to make a couple slits that are under 1mm apart. Or you could increase D by doing this in a long, empty corridor which would let you increase x for a given s, or increase s for a given x.
Upvote
0
Get a sheet of glass, paint it black, then scratch parallel lines with a craft knife.
Make a single slit with two old style razor blades.
The gap between slits should be of the order of 0.2mm
T
Make a single slit with two old style razor blades.
The gap between slits should be of the order of 0.2mm
T
Upvote
0
quantumspirit
evangelical humanist
Not just massless particles like photons (light), but also if you do this with massive particles such as electrons, or even whole atoms and molecules, you will get an interference pattern. However, use a detector to detect which slit it goes through, the interference pattern ceases, and you get piles. Turn detector off, and you get interference again.
Upvote
0
I do recall reading that somewhere...maybe the "The Elegant Universe" (Brian Greene). At any rate, a laser seems to be much more accessable than an electron gun. BTW, I finally got the experiment to work the way I originally tried - with an edge on playing card to act as a divider for the beam instead of a double slit plate, and a card with a pinhole in it between the laser and the playing card to make the beam smaller. It wasn't the nicest looking interference pattern, but there were clearly points contructive and destructive interference. I had the chance yesterday to try it with a HeNe laser and a commericially made double slit plate, and the similarity between those results and what I saw with the laser pointer and the playing card is further confirmation that it really did work. Thanks for all the suggestions everybody!
Upvote
0
Similar threads
