- Jun 18, 2014
- 30,521
- 16,866
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Uh - no.“And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.” (Genesis 17:14)
“And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses; Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;” (Colossians 2:13–14)
That says God is now accepting the uncircumcised; it does NOT say circumcision was abolished at the cross.
In Galatians Paul says that to be circumcised means one is obligated to keep the Law of Moses. And then he turns around in Acts 16 and Circ'd Timothy. (thus obligating Tim to the Law) If circ was abolished, why did Paul do that?
Upvote
0