Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
"Coincidence" just like "luck" and "chance" are words I try not to use. They are ways of eliminating God from the equation to me. Sometimes I slip up and use "coincidence" but the other's I don't use.
I'm familiar with many statement and sightings of the ark but really, I don't need that to tell me Noah's flood happened. There's more than enough geographical and archaeological evidence of the great flood.
I've been to Turkey while in the Navy (Izmir and Antalya). At Izmir I visted Ephesus, at Antalya I visited Perga.
Antalya is quite beautiful and scenic just lovely mountain scenery.
BW you are missing the pure joy of Paul in the NT about the seed of Israel. He and the NT are not overlooking Jer 31. Christ was the seed. All those, of any background, who are in him are the ones countless as the sands of the shore.
I've NEVER heard anyone say that...and I'm amil. My stand is that Christ came in judgment of Jerusalem to allow a stiffnecked people (for the most part) that crucified our Lord. The message to them was that the covenant He made with them was over...which is why the temple was absolutely destroyed just as Jesus said in would be. not ONE stone remained upon another, and the people were dispersed off the land.
It was the judgment of Israel/Jerusalem that took place in 70 AD. You don't have to agree with that...in time, you will!
Regardless.. How did Christ come in AD70 according to you if it wasn't in the cloud formations?
Perhaps we should all back up one more step. I often ask people to make sure of the "end" in "end of the age" in Mt 24A, but what about the coming? Are we sure that is THE return, or is it spoken to Jerusalem and is the return to judge it after sufficient appeal through the apostles to join his mission?
In that case, M24A's 'coming' isn't the 2nd coming at all. But by B (v29+) it is global and universal, so I'm inclined to stick with the expected end of the world.
No. We didn't go to Aksaz. That was a cruise on board the John F Kennedy (CV-67). It was an amazing cruise because we visited so many biblical places,Unreal.
You are the first person Ive ever heard of thats been to Izmir!!!!
Bit different than back home huh..
Ever been to Acsaz (sp)?
I retired in 1996 after 24 years, an airdale, a jet engine mechanic (Aviation Machinist Mate)...I was a BM2, what was your rate shippy??
Get in the word and study "clouds". You might learn something about prophetic language.Notrash told me that.
Regardless.. How did Christ come in AD70 according to you if it wasn't in the cloud formations?
I'm glad you asked!
He said He would come in the manner of the Father's glory (Matt 16:27-28; Lk. 9:26; Matt 24:33-34) ie: the same way the father "came" in Judgement against individual nations in the OT.
We have countless examples of the Father coming in His great glory during the Old Testamental period (be sure to note the graphic, physical descriptions and explicit "visual" connotations of Yahweh's comings):
[On Yahweh's coming to Egypt -- early 700s BC] Behold, Yahweh rides on a swift cloud, and comes to Egypt: and the idols of Egypt shall tremble at his presence; and the heart of Egypt shall melt in the midst of it. I will stir up the Egyptians against the Egyptians (Isaiah 19:1-2)These are just a few examples of the Father's Old-Testament comings, but there are many others: Yahweh came down and shot arrows at Saul and his armies, shaking the earth's foundations and the heavens at that time (2 Sam 22:8-16); Yahweh is depicted as having destroyed the universe when he judged Israel through Babylon (Jer 4:22-30), and did so again when he judged Egypt by Babylon's King Nebuchadnezzar (Ez 32:1-16). The Father entered into judgments with Egypt and Assyria in a spectacular coming in Isaiah 31. Habakkuk's depiction of Jehovah's coming at Mt. Sinai is nothing less than apocalyptic (Hab 3:3-16).
[On Yahweh's coming during the Maccabean Period] For I have bent Judah for me, I have filled the bow with Ephraim; and I will stir up your sons, Zion, against your sons, Greece, and will make you as the sword of a mighty man. Yahweh shall be seen over them, and his arrow shall go forth as the lightning; and the Lord Yahweh will blow the trumpet, and will go with whirlwinds of the south. Yahweh of Hosts will defend them; and they shall devour, and shall tread down the sling-stones; and they shall drink, and make a noise as through wine; and they shall be filled like bowls, like the corners of the altar. Yahweh their God will save them in that day (Zechariah 9:13-16)
[On Yahweh's coming to Israel for Babylonian Exile - 6th Century BC] Therefore thus says the Lord Yahweh: Because you are turbulent more than the nations that are round about you, and have not walked in my statutes, neither have kept my ordinances, neither have done after the ordinances of the nations that are round about you; therefore thus says the Lord Yahweh: Behold, I, even I, am against you; and I will execute judgments in the midst of you before the eyes of the nations. I will do in you that which I have not done, and whereunto I will not do any more the like, because of all your abominations (Ez 5:7-9)
[On Yahweh's coming to Israel for Babylonian Exile - 6th Century BC] As I live, says the Lord Yahweh, surely with a mighty hand, and with an outstretched arm, and with wrath poured out, will I be king over you: and I will bring you out from the peoples, and will gather you out of the countries in which you are scattered, with a mighty hand, and with an outstretched arm, and with wrath poured out; and I will bring you into the wilderness of the peoples, and there will I enter into judgment with you face to face...Hear the word of Yahweh: Thus says the Lord Yahweh, Behold, I will kindle a fire in you, and it shall devour every green tree in you, and every dry tree: the flaming flame shall not be quenched, and all faces from the south to the north shall be burnt thereby. All flesh shall see that I, Yahweh, have kindled it...Thus says Yahweh: Behold, I am against you, and will draw forth my sword out of its sheath, and will cut off from you the righteous and the wicked. Seeing then that I will cut off from you the righteous and the wicked, therefore shall my sword go forth out of its sheath against all flesh from the south to the north: and all flesh shall know that I, Yahweh, have drawn forth my sword out of its sheath (Ez 20:33-35,47-48; 21:3-5)
Jehovah hath made bare His holy arm before the eyes of all nations (Isa 52:10)
Were any of these OT comings visual, physical/literal appearances of Yahweh as the prophets describe in metaphorical prophetic language? Of course not (Jn 1:18; 1 Jn 4:12)--the Hebrews understood that no human could ever see Yahweh and live (Exodus 33:20).
Importantly, these comings of the Father form the entire backdrop for the doctrine of the "coming" of Christ, for it was in this manner of the Father's glory that Christ said he would come (Matt 16:27-28; Lk. 9:26; Matt 24:33-34). As stated in Matthew 21:40-45, the Lord of the Vineyard came to the apostate leaders of first-century Israel and was The Stone that crushed them to powder, removing the Kingdom of God from them and giving it to a new Nation.
Get in the word and study "clouds". You might learn something about prophetic language.
Like as God comes in judgment on Egypt in Isaiah 19:1:
The oracle concerning Egypt. Behold, the Lord is riding on a swift cloud and is about to come to Egypt; The idols of Egypt will tremble at His presence, And the heart of the Egyptians will melt within them.
This is just one way God uses clouds in prophecy...These are the things you miss when you want to read scripture and be literal, instead of reading it as literature, and examining HOW it says things, and what is going on when it is said.
Got a link to share so the rest of us can "personally check the accuracy"?
BW - My point was simply this. If a scientist makes a false finding to "disprove" a religion, then he or she will be laughed out of the scientific community. If said scientist states that a piece of wood was from 1950, when in fact it was much older, then he or she will face such ridicule that he or she will never again be able to show his or her face.
To ridicule a scientist because he or she makes a finding that the "Christian" community disagrees with, is asinine.
If I could...I'd do it again...
You are making assumptions about history, and I am citing proven facts that demonstrate that your assumptions are incorrect.Archeologist have also found proof of a flood, but they haven't found the ark, yet we as Christians believe the flood happened just as the scriptures say.
Now let's look at what you said above. When we read the scriptures we find the scriptures said that Assyria besieged Samaria for 3 years.
This then is the folly of your assertion. Assyria then goes and invades Judah but because of Hezekiah's reforms turning the people to God...God doesn't allow Judah to fall. The scripture makes it plain Assyria controlled and took the whole region.
This isn't rocket science...there's MORE than enough proof that this is what Micah and Isaiah where speaking of.
I make no assumption Biblewriter...you may think I do...but that's your perogative.You are making assumptions about history, and I am citing proven facts that demonstrate that your assumptions are incorrect.
The prophecy in Isaiah 10 has zero bearing on the Assyrian attack on Samaria. it was not eve about that attack, for the attack on Samaria was already past, as in verse 11 Assyrian says, "As I have done to Samaria and her idols, Shall I not do also to Jerusalem and her idols?"
Neither Sennacherib nor any other Assyrian leader ever invaded ancient Judea along the path precisely defined in Isaiah 10:28-32. And neither Israel not Judah ever made the counter-attack prophesied in Micah 5:5-6.
These are historical facts that are established beyond rational debate. Nothing you say can change this indisputable fact.
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]<><> <><[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]QUESTIONS FOR ANY VIRTUOUS-BEREAN-TYPE-BELIEVERS WHO MIGHT THOUGHTFULLY READ THIS POST[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]:[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]It seems that many [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif][FONT=Arial, sans-serif] have been [/FONT]discussing the dogma promoted via this thread's Original Post without ever considering the destructive consequences of that dogma. OR whether or not the dogma presented in the OP “infallibly” "encourages" and edifies-strengthens and promotes loving-holiness towards our God in Heaven and “all” others OR whether the dogma could inevitably “demoralize” those who were born into various cultures written into the Old Testament by “[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]unconverted[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]” writer/scribes -- who in their day were oftentimes “hateful” towards their “enemies”.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]So I pray that these pertinent questions will “strengthen” any prayerful Berean type of believers who would prayerfully consider them.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]<><> <><[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Would anyone else be willing to post the “several” scriptures that give the “simple” root-reasons for the “strong-delusion” in 2Thessalonians2?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]ALSO[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Would anyone else be willing to post the “several” scriptures that admonish us “all” to “attempt” to “reprove-correct” those teachers -- who are fulfilling these root-reasons?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]ALSO[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Would anyone else be willing to post their view concerning if a “similar” strong delusion as taught in 2Thessalonians2 had “caused” the holocaust in Jerusalem of 70AD to occur, and could then also occur in our own day?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]<><> <><[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]I pray that the thoughts in this post would cause some to further consider the eternal “fruitfulness” OR “unfruitfulness” of any doctrine-of-men whose heart was “obviously” [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]hardened[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif] when in was first written.
It will eventually become obvious that far too many doctrines-of-men have now been endorsed by too many teachers in our modern day, whose hearts have also become hardened towards the cultures they are “[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]slandering[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]”,[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif] rather than "reconciling" them back to God and HIS vision for their future.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]For Jesus' sacrifice' sake, let us all “choose” to be fruitful and faithful and faith-filled and “never” the opposite.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Shalom in Jesus,[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]A Servant of Jesus Christ[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]AJCServant [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]John [/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]10&15&17 & Revelation 21[/FONT]
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?