Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Rather thoroughly.
But if someone can produce Bible verses that I am unaware of, I'd say they should.
However, ones that say God is merciful or loving or that Christ died for the sins of the world--which is what we usually get from proponents of universal salvation--are not proof texts for universalism, and that fact should be obvious.
Yes, and I give credit for the effort. Unfortunately, none of them leads us to universalism as a conclusion, and you didn't bother to explain why you think they do.
I’m not so sure it is so long as you believe in great making properties. If you believe in those things, and that a perfect God would house those kinds of qualities to the greatest degree, it’s not hard to believe that the greatest conceivable being would prefer loving Him over torment (for example.)
Of course if you didn’t care for things like philosophy you wouldn’t care much for understanding the qualities that the greatest conceivable being would have, and as a consequence you wouldn’t care to think about the kinds of thing He would prefer above other things.
Instead you might just add place of preference to the verses or Bible systematic that you prefer.
What a shame. I had hoped that you would understand what I was explaining and then perhaps reply with some new thoughts on our subject.
I honestly think they speak for themselves and can't be made any clearer. I'm not saying they lead to a forced conclusion of universalism but they do point clearly in that direction.
What are you saying?No.
I wouldn't either.
None of those verses say so.
And make no mistake about it, universalism mean every last person saved; nothing short of that is universalism.
"in that direction" isn't universal salvation. They and others that are similar may show us that God may be generous when it comes to his judging, that he may reward his elect in ways that we cannot yet appreciate, that the suffering of the lost is not as barbaric as is sometimes imagined, that more will be saved than we suppose and fewer lost than is usually thought, or a dozen other possibilities which are short of universal salvation. And make no mistake about it, universalism means every last person saved; nothing short of that is universalism.
Did you not read post #1672?
I realise that and I'm beginning to think it makes the most sense. ECT makes no sense to me and I don't believe it is biblical.
I`ve just put my time into trying to understand what the Bible says rather than the philosophies
of men.
I want to know what gentile disciples of Paul believed and I want to know what God says about things.
That’s the Bible safe space again. The problem with dismissing the idea of great making properties is that it’s an idea found in the Bible.
To be wise or to be foolish? There’s an answer to that given in the Bible that goes towards creating a hierarchy of qualities, hence the greatest conceivable being.
When you dismiss the idea as one of the “philosophies of men” you’re loosely misusing Bible terms to help deny facts confirmed by the Bible, moral intuition, philosophy, nature and plain old common sense.
Then we should take biblical material very seriously when it testifies to sources of knowledge for God that exist outside of the Bible. I’m not going to waste my time or insult your intelligence by assuming you don’t know where these verses are, I’m sure you can already imagine a couple.
I don`t believe in New Age Christianity and that is what all that sounds like.
Well sir, as the judge said to the defendant: “Ignorance of the law is no excuse.”
Great making properties have been argued for in one form or another so far back as Augustine (354-430) and Anselm of Canterbury (1093-1109.)
As much as I’d love to dunk on that shifty Augustine for being a new ager, he’s too dang old.
Although this is overlooking the fact that I’ve already shown you great making properties from the Bible (e.g. pride or humility, wisdom or foolishness, knowledge or ignorance.)
If you have ever used the prefix “omni” you’re knee deep in the waters of perfect being theology.
It depends... If you refer to Universalism as a mesh of all religions where every one of its leaders is on par with Jesus Christ and where Jesus is just, one of the guys, then obviously not! There is a push right now for a new world order; a push towards a One World Religion caracterised by an absolute relative and personalised meaning of truth and salvation where anything goes.What’s commonly referred to as Christian universalism. Everyone eventually saved and the whole of creation reconciled through the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ. All paths don’t lead to God, but all will someday be saved upon the one right path.
I have a question for you.
Assume we agree
1) Only God can properly perceive objective reality. We see in part.
2) Whatever is written in the Bible - is detailing some of "objective reality".
3) We read the Bible.
How do we know we have properly perceived / understood the "Objective Reality"?
Ordinarily - if you need accuracy, you devise a test of some sort and can determine accuracy. A measuring stick or something like that.
What measuring stick can we use to measure the accuracy of our conclusions drawn from the Bible?
My thoughts were this:
There is no way to know if what we have understood to be correct, is actually correct (objective reality / proven).
We can be satisfied our conclusions are true, but not prove them true.
We will just have to do our very best to sincerely review our conclusions, be honest and accept, that we don't know. Like scientists would do when they discover new per. Observe, hypothesis, test/predict, pass test/get a prediction correct / assume your conclusion is correct - you're accurate
I cannot see any other way.
Does everyone else think this is the case? Or just me?
This is of course true about some translations. However, very very few of the posters here on CF turn to one of those versions, from what I've observed in their posts.This will not be popular, but I will say it anyway: If you want to tap into objective reality, as you say, through the pages of Scripture, it is essential that you read a version that is clear, honest and not translated according to theology. Translating according to theology puts the cart before the horse. As a bonus, stay away from versions which are married to a denomination, such as the one the Watchtower folks put out. Beyond that, I don't care to endorse any, as so few versions deserve an endorsement. Some here speak of the "Word of God," but out here in Biblereaderland, it is a jungle...
/end rant/
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?