• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Would life on Mars be a problem for your religious beliefs?

serge546

Master of microbes
May 5, 2012
365
14
Texas
✟15,579.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Democrat
Hello everyone,

So the Mars Curiosity Rover successfully landed on the Red Planet. Some of its objectives are to find evidence for past or present life on Mars and/or evidence of past, life-friendly conditions on the planet.

The point of this thread is not to say your religion is false IF life is found; rather, I am interested if life on other planets would be a problem for your religion. Would God (Judeo-Christian god) also be credited with making this life even if it not mentioned in the bible?

Feel free to discuss any questions which may arise from this topic.
 

serge546

Master of microbes
May 5, 2012
365
14
Texas
✟15,579.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Democrat
Fair enough, singpeace. What I ask myself is this, however: If you are going to credit God with creating life on Mars (I'm talking about microorganisms here) then you are implying it's well within his power to create microorganisms on earth.

If he created microorganisms on earth, why are they not mentioned in the Bible? They are, by far, the most important players in the world (even if you exclude pathogens, which are the minority of microorganisms). A simple sentence in the Bible saying something along the lines of "there are tiny animals (I know bacteria are not animals, bear with me, though) which you cannot see, but they are there and they create all sorts of trouble if you don't control them" would have saved billions of lives throughout history.
 
Upvote 0

Amber Bird

We have enough gun control.We need idiot control!
Jul 8, 2012
771
50
✟1,243.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
"Life" per say is a broad concept. If you mean something akin to humanoid life, it wouldn't shake my understanding or relationship with God at all.

Jeremiah 10:12 But God made the earth by his power; he founded the world by his wisdom and stretched out the heavens by his understanding.
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟187,250.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Hello everyone,

So the Mars Curiosity Rover successfully landed on the Red Planet. Some of its objectives are to find evidence for past or present life on Mars and/or evidence of past, life-friendly conditions on the planet.

The point of this thread is not to say your religion is false IF life is found; rather, I am interested if life on other planets would be a problem for your religion. Would God (Judeo-Christian god) also be credited with making this life even if it not mentioned in the bible?

Feel free to discuss any questions which may arise from this topic.

Personally, I would love it if they were able to find life on another world :) For most people, I suspect that their perspective of alien life discovered would not mean they'd drop their thoughts/views of Theism. Many are similar to Carl Sagen in his views....if ever reading the book "Contact" or seeing the film later that starred Jodie Foster. Carl Sagan, noted astronomer and skeptic, makes his opinion on organized religion clear since he is very hostile to it................but with the film/book, he seemed to favour a sort of scientific respect for the universe in the extension of Einstein and others (who believes in God but sees him as distant). Albert Einstein (1879-1955) recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe/saw clearly that there was a design--with nothing simply happening. That didn't mean he believed in Jesus, of course, as many may assume. For context, in developing the theory of relativity, Einstein realized that the equations led to the conclusion that the universe had a beginning. He didn't like the idea of a beginning, because he thought one would have to conclude that the universe was created by God. So, he added a cosmological constant to the equation to attempt to get rid of the beginning. He said this was one of the worst mistakes of his life. Of course, the results of Edwin Hubble confirmed that the universe was expanding and had a beginning at some point in the past. So, Einstein became a deist - a believer in an impersonal creator God.
"In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views."
---Prinz Hubertus zu Lowenstein, Towards the Further Shore: An Autobiography (Victor Gollancz, London, 1968), p. 156.
"I'm not an atheist and I don't think I can call myself a pantheist. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangements of the books, but doesn't know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God."
---G. S. Viereck, Glimpses of the Great (Macauley, New York, 1930), quoted by D. Brian, Einstein: A Life , p. 186
Going back to what was said in the film known as "Contact",there much of the film focused on describing the relationship that the main character, Elle the scientist, had with Palmer the Theologian....as by the end of the film, she ended up in the exact same position she would have fought against earlier when it came to accepting things on faith that it seemed she simply couldn't explain logically to other skeptics who demanded "proof" of her transcendental experiences in the universe.

There were many positive things within the book/film "Contact" that many believers have favored for some time since it actually seemed to be very much in support of Theism---for whereas the movie kept the theme of the "message" from Vega being in a certain numerical pattern (as mathematics is the universal language), the Book didn't do as the film did by making it seem as if it was all orchestrated by extra-terrestial beings alone. In the book, Ellie went alongside five passengers through a series of wormholes to a place near the center of the Milky Way galaxy, where they met the senders in the guise of persons significant in the lives of the travelers, whether living or dead....and some of the travelers' questions were answered by the senders, with the senders ultimately hinting at proof of a Universal Creator contained inside one of the transcendental numbers.

Ellie being a lifelong religious skeptic switched in the book (as she did in the film), finding herself asking the world to take a leap of faith and believe what she and the others say happened to them...and having Palmer Joss be the one to support her as in the film. Sadly, it was ommitted from the film where Ellie, acting upon a suggestion by the senders of the message, worked on a program which computes the digits of π to record lengths and in different bases. Very, very far from the decimal point (1020) and in base 11, it found that a special pattern does exist when the numbers stop varying randomly and start producing 1s and 0s in a very long string. The string's length is the product of 11 prime numbers. The 1s and 0s when organized as a square of specific dimensions form a rasterized circle. The book showed how the extraterrestrials suggested that this is an artist's signature, woven into the very fabric of space-time.... another message, one from the universe's creator....and yet, ironically, the author of "Contact" kept from making grounds for anyone establishing any kind of organized religion by portratying the extraterrestrials as being just as ignorant to its meaning as Ellie. They also made reference to older artifacts built from space time itself (namely the wormhole transit system) abandoned by a prior civilization---and all of this leads to a new pursuit and passion driving work with the SETI program in trying to search for meaningful signals in noise from space.

Although I do believe that it's possible the Lord created alien life in the universe apart from us (more shared in-depth here and here ), some of it similar in dynamic with what was seen in the film "Contact" , I do think that what will always make a difference is the direction that a belief takes you. In the event E.T is being focused on, if it causes someone to be thankful for how much diversity he's capable of, I would not think "demonic"...but if others saw E.T and thought in terms of secular humanistic ideology (i.e. "Alien life proves there is no god" or "All forms of visitation do not need to be suspect of bad origins", etc), I would take pause.

Granted, as many are aware that things could be deceptions from the devil/enemy (for those who are Theist and believe in the God scripture points to), personally I'd wonder whether or not people would be more open to what believers seen as deception if seeing ET Beings come down with their own views. It could lend more credence to the thought others already have when seeing CHristianity as simply one view among many others rather than having a unique stance/verifiable when saying Christ is the Waay to salvation...

As II Corinthians 11 already notes how the enemy can appear as an angel of light, with the ability to appear shining/pretty never changing (as evidenced by many who had visitations by what they assumed to be angels...and those angels told them to do A LOT of evil things or things counter to what the scriptures say)....just because a creature looks nice doesn't mean it can be trusted...and I'm certain there'd be many who'd be quick to assume that any form of alien life discovered is automatically a negative.

However, IMHO, I would think that it's also possible for alien to truly be present--and even if it looks not really menancing, I don't know if one would need to automatically get in the defensive by suspecting them to be demonic.

C.S Lewis, in his "Space Triology" series, was very brilliant in the ways that he brought out the concept of alien worlds existing and yet still needing to be under the rule/lordship of the Almighty....and for many, it seems to give a bit of fresh air to understand that believing in E.T doesn't mean one must cease believing in Christ. If a UFO showed up tommorrow at the White House, many would be of the mindset that they'd be in just as much need of the Savior as anyone else....and the only way to tell if/when it's demonic or not is if they advocate that Christ is not real. If they said that they were wanting to learn of and follow Jesus Christ as our Lord/Savior", would it still be necessary for people to think "It's a DEMON!!!!"

Even if other alien beings showed up/had their own religion set up, I don't know if I would be thinking they're demonic. What I would be processing is whether or not it's possible the Lord made other creations in existence...and they happened to find their way to our planet, with the Lord desiring that His redeemed people evangelize/preach the Gospel to them just as we do for all others---and perhaps those creations would come to trust in the Lord because of what Christ has sought to accomplish. A genuine alien lifeform coming from a culture with their own religious beliefs would at that point be no different than with others on the planet here who come from differing cultures/have differing religions due to their developmental context....and regardless of the differences, the Gospel of Christ as the ONLY way would still be what needs to be preached/proclaimed.

Just my two cents, as I do wonder. Again, I guess I'd wonder what to make of the possibility of aliens being real and whether or not that really clashes with the testimony of the scriptures? For some things don't seem to be spelled out as clearly...and if the atonement is real, I'd think it'd be far reaching. In the event I didn't say it the right way, for more on, as seen here:

__________________
With the Mars mission, the entire time I've been reminded of "John Carter of Mars" , the novel series that precedded much of what's seen in Sci-Fi also and which spoke on the issue when the main hero (John Carter) fell in love with a Red Martian.....something many often pondered on when it came to the concept of relationships :)




JohnCarter_LCollins_TKitsch.jpg


john-carter-1.jpg


John Carter" is a very beautiful film (based on the book "John Carter of Mars" made by the same man who made "Tarzan" )...and to see it come out before they landed on Mars gives a lot to think on.





IMAX promotional poster for John Carter's midnight show; art by Mondo​


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNC7IWqxIWE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=butMdidqqCs&index=19&list=PL1106B70905F773D7


 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Gracchus

Senior Veteran
Dec 21, 2002
7,199
821
California
Visit site
✟30,682.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Easy G (G²);61123443 said:
With Mars, I'm automatically reminded of "John Carter of Mars" , the novel series that precedded much of what's seen in Sci-Fi also and which spoke on the issue when the main hero (John Carter) fell in love with a Red Martian.....something many often pondered on when it came to the concept of relationships
Ponder this: The son of John Carter and Dejah Thoris, was hatched from an egg!

John Carter" is a very beautiful film (based on the book "John Carter of Mars" made by the same man who made "Tarzan" )...and to see it come out before they landed on Mars gives a lot to think on.
The film was very loosely based on the book "A Princess of Mars". There was a whole series, and I, as a pre-adolescent, read them all. They were not very good, even by the standards of cheap pulp fiction.

I would agree that the special effects in the movie were very good. I just wish they had hired a writer. Even Burroughs was better than that.

:wave:
 
Upvote 0

Metal Minister

New Year, Still Old School!
May 8, 2012
12,142
591
✟37,499.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
serge546 said:
Hello everyone,

So the Mars Curiosity Rover successfully landed on the Red Planet. Some of its objectives are to find evidence for past or present life on Mars and/or evidence of past, life-friendly conditions on the planet.

The point of this thread is not to say your religion is false IF life is found; rather, I am interested if life on other planets would be a problem for your religion. Would God (Judeo-Christian god) also be credited with making this life even if it not mentioned in the bible?

Feel free to discuss any questions which may arise from this topic.

You say your purpose isn't to say that our beliefs are false, but then attack those said beliefs...8^/ personally though, I have no problem because I'm fairly certain they won't find any life on mars.

May God Richly Bless You! MM
 
Upvote 0

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,452
805
73
Chicago
✟138,626.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Hello everyone,

So the Mars Curiosity Rover successfully landed on the Red Planet. Some of its objectives are to find evidence for past or present life on Mars and/or evidence of past, life-friendly conditions on the planet.

The point of this thread is not to say your religion is false IF life is found; rather, I am interested if life on other planets would be a problem for your religion. Would God (Judeo-Christian god) also be credited with making this life even if it not mentioned in the bible?

Feel free to discuss any questions which may arise from this topic.

Not at all. I expect we would eventually find life forms on other planet. But they are only plants, and some "primitive" forms such as bacteria or algae. There will be no animals, needless to say intelligent beings.

If this is confirmed, then the theory of evolution will be ultimately broken.
 
Upvote 0

Mr Strawberry

Newbie
Jan 20, 2012
4,180
81
Great Britain
✟27,542.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Not at all. I expect we would eventually find life forms on other planet. But they are only plants, and some "primitive" forms such as bacteria or algae. There will be no animals, needless to say intelligent beings.

If this is confirmed, then the theory of evolution will be ultimately broken.

Are you referring to land plants?
 
Upvote 0

The Engineer

I defeated Dr Goetz
Jul 29, 2012
629
31
✟23,423.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Not at all. I expect we would eventually find life forms on other planet. But they are only plants, and some "primitive" forms such as bacteria or algae. There will be no animals, needless to say intelligent beings.

If this is confirmed, then the theory of evolution will be ultimately broken.
No, not at all. As long as we can still observe how life forms that should be capable of evolution evolve, the theory will be fine.

The evolution theory doesn't postulate that life has to become more intelligent, or even complex. It simply becomes better at surviving. If this means that life will stagnate in the bacterial stage because anything above this stage will die, then life will stagnate.

Look at thermal vents in the sea. Do you think the bacteria that feed of this vents would gain anything by becoming conscious?
 
Upvote 0

GodActsOnMe

Scientificum Christianus
Aug 6, 2012
78
2
31
✟22,723.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
No, not at all. As long as we can still observe how life forms that should be capable of evolution evolve, the theory will be fine.

The evolution theory doesn't postulate that life has to become more intelligent, or even complex. It simply becomes better at surviving. If this means that life will stagnate in the bacterial stage because anything above this stage will die, then life will stagnate.

Look at thermal vents in the sea. Do you think the bacteria that feed of this vents would gain anything by becoming conscious?

Completely correct. Organisms evolve under selective pressures caused by its environment. They do not simply "evolve" because something would be advantageous for them.
 
Upvote 0

Split Rock

Conflation of Blathers
Nov 3, 2003
17,607
730
North Dakota
✟22,466.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Not at all. I expect we would eventually find life forms on other planet. But they are only plants, and some "primitive" forms such as bacteria or algae. There will be no animals, needless to say intelligent beings.

If this is confirmed, then the theory of evolution will be ultimately broken.

If we find the same species on other worlds, then that would be a problem. if we find different life on different worlds, would you still think it would "break" evolution?
 
Upvote 0

GodActsOnMe

Scientificum Christianus
Aug 6, 2012
78
2
31
✟22,723.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
The chances are slim. However, I feel that with enough probing, they will find evidence of past life there.

That may propose a problem though. What if the past life was intelligent? I have often wondered about the past, and how much activity that has been unobserved while we developed. Venus, for example, is thought to be similar to Earth at one point. The only reason it is different now is due to the incredible amount of greenhouse gases found in the atmosphere. What if intelligent life was responsible for that destructive environment? I think we'd have to think a little harder about what we are doing to our own planet.

I don't know, the most life that could possibly live there are minute colonies of microbial life, nothing more than that.
 
Upvote 0

serge546

Master of microbes
May 5, 2012
365
14
Texas
✟15,579.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Democrat
You say your purpose isn't to say that our beliefs are false, but then attack those said beliefs...8^/ personally though, I have no problem because I'm fairly certain they won't find any life on mars.

May God Richly Bless You! MM

I agree my posts were a bit contradictory. I didn't mean to come off that way. I was merely stating what I believe in my second post and did not mean to say that everyone is wrong because it is not the way I would like it to be.

In my own defense, I did type the disclaimer "feel free to discuss any topics that arise out of this".

As Split Rock says, if we were to find the SAME species on Mars then Evolutionary theory would be in a lot of trouble. After all, evolutionary theory is based on organisms sharing a common ancestor and there is a lot of explaining to do if you have the same organism on both planets.

However, if there are DIFFERENT species/organisms on Mars then there is no problem for evolutionary theory. In fact, it would revolutionize the field. Just imagine, a new field of biology named "Martian evolution"! That would be a truly fascinating subject of study.


Furthermore, it would shed some light on abiogenesis (unless you attribute these organisms to God).
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟187,250.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
What if the past life was intelligent? I have often wondered about the past, and how much activity that has been unobserved while we developed. Venus, for example, is thought to be similar to Earth at one point. The only reason it is different now is due to the incredible amount of greenhouse gases found in the atmosphere. What if intelligent life was responsible for that destructive environment? I think we'd have to think a little harder about what we are doing to our own planet..
Good question.....

I think many times people think to find intelligent life on other worlds that is the same as how we are on the earth...and not many consider that perhaps it could have died out due to doing things to their planet that we're doing now. The movie Avatar was an excellent example of that...
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,910
Georgia
✟1,094,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Hello everyone,

So the Mars Curiosity Rover successfully landed on the Red Planet. Some of its objectives are to find evidence for past or present life on Mars and/or evidence of past, life-friendly conditions on the planet.

The point of this thread is not to say your religion is false IF life is found; rather, I am interested if life on other planets would be a problem for your religion. Would God (Judeo-Christian god) also be credited with making this life even if it not mentioned in the bible?

Feel free to discuss any questions which may arise from this topic.

In Hebrews 1 and 11 God is the creator of "The WORLDS" not just this world. So intelligent life on other planets (certainly outside of our solar system) - is a definite. No life on any of the other planets in our solar system but earth.

Where religion comes in -- is if you make life something that "evolved" on this planet or the next does not matter. As Darwin points out - that shoots the Christian Bible in the head.

Dawkins, Provine, Meyers and most Bible believing (sola scriptura practicing) Christians are in agreement with Darwin on that one point.

Where we would have trouble is finding out that life evolved - or that the intelligent life on other planets is fallen life - fallen into sin, suffering decay and death (War, disease etc).

in Christ,

Bob
 
Upvote 0