People's issue seems to be purely the title of the woman. Every time a Biblical example has been put forward, it's been reponded to with statements resembling, 'yeah, but, they weren't a pastor,' and the fact that they were doing everything that a pastor does, such as teach, inspire, lead Godly lives, evangelise, lead, etc. is irrelevant because they weren't referred to as a pastor.
First of all, I very much doubt that the church structure of Biblical times is at all similar to modern structure, given the millenia that separates us, the formation of denominations etc. Second of all, it is highly likely that there WERE women pastors, Paul continually commending women in his letters, such as in Phillipians 4. Romans 16:1 speaks of a 'servant' of God named Phoebe, a woman, and this word 'servant' is actually the same word used for 'minister' to describe Paul himself in the original Greek translation. And finally, is not the church the body of believers? I see it time and time again where people keep referring to 'the church,' thinking of the building/physical institution. No, 1 Corinthians 12 CLEARLY says otherwise, whereby the church is the body of christ, the body of christ made up by the believers. Paul says that each has a different role within the body, and so who's to say that a woman doesn't have the role of teaching and advacing the gospel? Indeed, the first preaching of the gospel is undertaken by Mary under commission from the angel at the tomb.
Also, to say that, "the Bible is outdated," is fundamentally wrong; Christ came to create a new and eternal covenant, so as long as we are loving the Lord our God with all our heart, mind, soul and strength, and loving our neighbour as ourself, we are living according to this doctrine. Doctrine can be misinterpreted, but not outdated. To suggest as such would be to suggest that it is not the word of God, as God is unchanging.