Wired: How to Date the Grand Canyon: Go With the Flow

[flatworm]

I'll let the voters decide.
I welcome the whole world to red the discussion and indeed be educated about why evolution and company are still around.
I didn't know moderators were judging things here.
If so why not end all discussion and let the moderators decide whether creationism or evolutionism is right.
It was a good discussion and everyone could learn something on many levels. I thought it was fine. Yes I had the advantage but I also learned things.
I brought close scrunity to the claims made very carelessly.
I won the thread.
Baggins is a competent poster in these areas but needs to weigh evidence better in conclusions about earth sciences and whether I'm one of these Poe's. (Whatever that is)
No need for anger here. I'm having fun.
However someones right and someones wrong. Intelligent people under close discussion should discover the actual truth on the issue of the thread.
Robert Byers

My vote: I find it hard to imagine how you could have been more outmatched. Baggins brought professional expertise and field experience, and all you ever presented was hubris, denial and stone-deafness.

 

[Frumious Bandersnatch]

I'll let the voters decide.
I welcome the whole world to red the discussion and indeed be educated about why evolution and company are still around.

Aside from a handfull of religiously motivated deniers, the whole educated world has decided long ago and Young Earth Creationism lost.

I didn't know moderators were judging things here.
If so why not end all discussion and let the moderators decide whether creationism or evolutionism is right.
It was a good discussion and everyone could learn something on many levels. I thought it was fine. Yes I had the advantage but I also learned things.
I brought close scrunity to the claims made very carelessly.

What claims were made carelessly?

I won the thread.

This statement shows that your ignorance of science is only exceeded by your capacity for self delusion.

Baggins is a competent poster in these areas but needs to weigh evidence better in conclusions about earth sciences and whether I'm one of these Poe's. (Whatever that is)

Unfortunately for you Baggins is wrong about you deliberately being a parody of a YEC. You actually seem to believe the absolute nonsense you post. You are indeed a parody but it doesn't seem to be intentional on your part.

No need for anger here. I'm having fun.

I don't know about others but I am amused and not angered by the absurdity you post. You are doing a great job of showing the level of ignorance and denial of science required to accept YEC.

However someones right and someones wrong. Intelligent people under close discussion should discover the actual truth on the issue of the thread.
Robert Byers

The truth is that every post of yours that I have ever read on this and other boards indicates that you are totally ignorant of any branch of science you chose to comment on.

 

[Molal]

I didn't know moderators were judging things here.

Being a moderator has nothing to do with me being here debating you. I am allowed to participate in the forum as you are allowed.

And you clearly didn't win the thread..........