Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What he's holding in his hand - the immediate referent - can only be wine.
The less immediate referent is to the messianic banquet, which is always wine.
Again, what about all the Christians TODAY that have no access to wine?
You press grapes and leave em for a bit.Lion King said:Grape juice wasn't invented yet? How did the Israelites make wine then?
It's as much an assumption as assuming sunrises happen in the east.Lion King said:Again, where is the evidence that the term "fruit of the vine" is always referring to wine? All you have presented so far is assumption.
According to Wiki, it is more "old world"Tomato is a "new world" (South America) berry
It's as much an assumption as assuming sunrises happen in the east.
You press grapes and leave em for a bit.
The idea that the intermediate step might be considered something in its own right only makes sense once you can safely preserve it. Until then it makes rather less sense than thinking of bread-dough as a food to eat in that state.
There were some places in the past where lack of locally produced wine was an issue. This was one of the reasons it became common in some places to give communion in one kind.
Substitute for something else. What's important is the spiritual meaning behind the LORD's Supper.
I personally agree with you. I guess the real question would be to those that say "wine only"...
What "real question"? Historical - wine. Traditional - wine. Scriptural - wine. There is NO case for using anything else, so there is no question except for those who like to question for the sake of questioning.
Surely you can see wisdom in a recovered alcoholic not drinking wine. Is he not obeying the Lord if he drinks only juice? If its acceptable then for him to drink only juice, then why would anyone else be any different?
Are you suggesting that those who suffer from wine allergy should go ahead and consume wine presented at the LORD's supper as God will protect them?
Do you have any Scriptural evidence that states that only wine is to be used at the LORD's supper?
You're talking a small swig of wine that is also Jesus' body. If Jesus were standing in front of you right now, would you dare suggest to him that his own body would cause you to sin?
the word ampelos means vine, and in every instance listed in the bible, it refers to a grapevine. So Jesus used wine.
I'm not a wine only person, but I do believe that wine SHOULD be used, because it's what Jesus used.
Is this Sacramental Theology 101? Where shall we start with Abraham? Read the hospitality and the encounter with Melchizedek and we can go from there.
I'm still waiting on the Scriptural evidence that only wine should be used to commemorate the LORD's ultimate sacrifice.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?