Yes did I miss something, I did a fast scan of the article while I was doing other things.lol...Did you read the link?
well a hint would be that it has something to do with Pelosi and 100K
Yes did I miss something, I did a fast scan of the article while I was doing other things.
Yes the 100K included other things BUT look at what she has spent according to this article. Seems excessive.Yes, Bachman falsly accused Pelosi of spending 100k on booze and was rated ”pants on fire”. Typical political lie, this is pertinent to the discussion how?
Yes the 100K included other things BUT look at what she has spent according to this article. Seems excessive.
Wow you are right I only got part of the story and it is even worse than I thought. thanks for setting me straight. Nancy Pelosi Is No Stranger to Extravagant Taxpayer Funded Trips, With One Costing Nearly $200,000.....
No, read the whole thing. Its also about 2010... 9 years ago.
Just save yourself some embarresment and admit your mistake. Dont double down, thats stupid.
Michelle Bachman’s ...... histrionic at times?And your point is?
Well, the state of the government is not being determined by Melania. Remember, Trump canceled Pelosi's flight because she is a key leader for getting the government running. Not Melania. I couldn't care less where Melania goes.
The last I checked she is also his equal in terms of government position. She is not answerable to his beck and call.
.....
No, read the whole thing. Its also about 2010... 9 years ago.
Just save yourself some embarresment and admit your mistake. Dont double down, thats stupid.
Yes the errors in that post were pointed out to me and I will admit that I did not read it as carefully as I should have. But there were some undeniable facts beyond the technical error. Never the less I have found a much better article that is much more up to date. Nancy Pelosi Is No Stranger to Extravagant Taxpayer Funded Trips, With One Costing Nearly $200,000Perhaps if participants of this thread do not actually click on your link, take notice of the date of its publication and align facts accordingly, or read to the conclusion where Michele Bachmann was admonished and declared to have her pants on fire for her sloppy and petty subterfuge, the title alone might have succeeded in serving as a rebuttal to my post. But there's many who are not lazy or naive enough to just trust a link title for an accurate depiction. The article was posted in September, 2010 when Nancy Pelosi was previously serving as the Speaker of the House, and thus entitled to use of military jets, precisely as I explained. It also confirms what I stated about how Pelosi's Republican predecessor, Dennis Hastert of Illinois, used them as well, under a program approved under President George W. Bush.
WND is not a news site, and has no journalistic standards.
Yes the errors in that post were pointed out to me and I will admit that I did not read it as carefully as I should have. But there were some undeniable facts beyond the technical error. Never the less I have found a much better article that is much more up to date. Nancy Pelosi Is No Stranger to Extravagant Taxpayer Funded Trips, With One Costing Nearly $200,000
Indeed. See below.
I wonder if that Red State opinion piece is as heavy on innuendo and lies as the claim about the $100,000 in booze that WND still has up on their website. You know what else they still have up on their website? A bogus story (also spread by Lying Michelle Bachmann) about President Obama's 2010 trip to India costing $2,000,000,000.
Obama's $2 billion India armada - WND - WND
But hey, "the media" jumped the gun on the Covington students and didn't walk it back for five hours so they have zero reliability.
no but i did catch the part about the job being up for reappointment by POTUS in the near future, do you think that might be important?
Come on now this has been addressed at least three times now. Once again it was a JOKE. Got it? The whole thread was tongue in cheek humor.Strange that you expect such a humdrum post to be willing to be as cravenly partisan and spitefully political as the president.
Yes the errors in that post were pointed out to me and I will admit that I did not read it as carefully as I should have. But there were some undeniable facts beyond the technical error. Never the less I have found a much better article that is much more up to date. Nancy Pelosi Is No Stranger to Extravagant Taxpayer Funded Trips, With One Costing Nearly $200,000
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?