Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!
Skeptic.Agreed. It would be impossible to land on a star.
But what is there in your post to prove that those images come from NASA? Nothing that I could see. You need to provide the source of the attachments, then we would know whether they are actually NASA images.
It's an example of Pareidolia:What do you think ? Here's a liitle help .......
source photo --- > https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/msl/multimedia/pia16204.html
Lets play "Where's Wally the Squirrel"
View attachment 362362
If your like NASA and did not see it before you published it here is Wally.
View attachment 362363
Did you know that the English Literary Society successfully petitioned to have the word "gullible" removed from the dictionary?
Ha!Did you know that the English Literary Society successfully petitioned to have the word "gullible" removed from the dictionary?
Yes, it was widely* reported at the time. When President Biden was asked about this, an aid had to inform him what it meant. Unlike Trump (not yet master of all) who was more awake and declared that foreign French words had no place in American language. It's unclear whether he still thinks it's a French word or now thinks it's a Great American Word.Did you know that the English Literary Society successfully petitioned to have the word "gullible" removed from the dictionary?
But in the context of Obadiah's prophecy, those words were spoken against Edom, who as far as I know didn't engage in space travel.Obadiah 1:4
Though you soar like the eagle and make your nest among the stars, from there I will bring you down,” declares the LORD.
But in the context of Obadiah's prophecy, those words were spoken against Edom, who as far as I know didn't engage in space travel.
Yes of course He does, but His word, the bible, was not written for Himself, but for human beings, who don't see the future.God is all knowing, he knows the future also.
Yes of course He does, but His word, the bible, was not written for Himself, but for human beings, who don't see the future.
Come on! Revelation's stated purpose was to reveal things which are to take place. The Obadiah quote you gave wasn't; it was a judgment against the Edom of Obadiah's day.If this is the case then the book of Revelation has been & gone.
No - The Bible was written for all ages from Genesis to Revelation.
It doesn't reflect of what the Lord said.Come on! Revelation's stated purpose was to reveal things which are to take place. The Obadiah quote you gave wasn't; it was a judgment against the Edom of Obadiah's day.
Who the Lord is speaking to does make a great difference. Otherwise all Christian men would have to marry harlots, because God told Hosea to do that. God's words via the prophet Obadiah were addressed to Edom, and as I say, they weren't known for travelling in space. To suggest that God's words there must be referring to modern space travellers is to rip the words out of their context. Incidentally, I should stress that I am not saying that Obadiah has no relevance to Christians. Of course it does, but not in the way you suggested.It doesn't reflect of what the Lord said.
Tesla's Optimus robots will be used to explore the surface of Mars, Elon Muskconfirmed today.
![]()
Elon Musk to send "Optimus" robots to Mars: What to know
The SpaceX CEO said Starship will depart for Mars with the Optimus robots at the end of 2026.www.newsweek.com
Were you expecting anything else?More conspiracy trash.