Wikipedia - Evolution

[DaSwuush]

Anyone want to debate against Wikipedia on Evolution? I know you can edit it, but it changes back. It lists it's sources and what not

For that matter, does anyone want to debate against scientific evidence?

 

[Wiccan_Child]

Against scientific evidence?

 

[NailsII]

Anyone want to debate against Wikipedia on Evolution? I know you can edit it, but it changes back. It lists it's sources and what not

For that matter, does anyone want to debate against scientific evidence?

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
Are you trying to flood wikipedia, and assume that whatever survives must be true?
Is this not just like spray-paint vandalism on something you don't like?

 

[RyanLeeParis]

Wikipedia is a good source for a quick glance at understanding something, but a horrible source to dig deeper into information. I bet even the moderators don't fully understand evolution, only very expert scientists in the field.

 

[Matthewj1985]

Wikipedia is a good source for a quick glance at understanding something, but a horrible source to dig deeper into information. I bet even the moderators don't fully understand evolution, only very expert scientists in the field.

That is why the creation movement still survives, people on whole are stupid and when a guy in a lab coat uses big words we assume he is right. I mean how well would one of the creation seminars go if every 30 seconds someone was correcting the speaker?

 

[Atheuz]

The Evolution article on Wikipedia is at least so much better than the one on Conservapedia which is just a giant Creationism suckup fest, the entire article does not contain a single shred of evidence for Evolution - Just a lot of text of Creationists tooting their own horn and criticizing Evolution.

 

[DaisyDay]

Wikipedia is good for quick info; read & follow the footnotes/links for more depth.