• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Why would an atheist come to Christ, if not to avoid hell?

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Take a deep breath, why are you so angry at me?
So, what you're saying is that you alone know the real Jesus, and everyone else is faking. Are you suggesting that you're a True Christian(tm)?
No I reject the notion that anyone would identify me as being akin to a "True Christian™". Just plain old Christian will do for me thanks.
If I may say so, and quote you above: His words are written down, but the intentions behind them are not. Someone else, such as myself, has no reason to believe your interpretation as you are injecting your own beliefs into it.
Not really, I am reading it for what is said. There is very little in terms of context except that Jesus required her to justify her faith. Once she had justified her faith then He acted upon it. The reason is not clear in the information we have, so you and I are only able to speculate about His reason. I take Him for a good man, so I look for a good reason why He did that and I see it that way. Contrarily you look for a bad reason and you see it that way. Why do you think that is?
I see it as it is written: He calls the Canaanite woman a dog. The text of the story says that Jesus treated her like a dog, asking her to beg. If Jesus was just being a jerk to the woman, how would the story be different? Afterall, at the end of the story, nobody has said that the woman is anything other than a begging dog. Which is definitely condescending.
If the woman thought Him as bad as you make Him out to be, she would not have called Him Lord, nor begged for His help, and if He had have not loved her then He would not have given her any attention. Instead He encouraged her faith by challenging it and eventually granted her wish. Why do you see that as being bad? Furthermore, why do you see it as being bad if she doesn't?
Yes, he was intending to condescend her. If He was not then He would not have done so. You rebuked Ronald for putting forth the very same attitude, but it's okay when Jesus does it. How is what Ronald did, significantly different from what Jesus did? Why are Christians suddenly doing wrong by acting like jerks for Jesus?
Jesus was helping the woman, Ronald was insulting you. Can't you see that from assessing the results of their actions?
Canaanites are a race. Atheists are not. It still stands to reason that Jesus hates atheists. Realistically, He must think us worse than dogs because we don't come begging to worship Him.
.
Well, I think those who say in their heart there is no God could very well describe atheists. We certainly don't say in our heart there is God. Let's observe the actual text:

Ps. 14:1 - The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

That's pretty clear, I think.
Well go ahead and think yourself a fool. If that is how you prefer to think then I won't argue about it.
But it's what the Bible explicitly says. And no, there are no exceptions to Biblical rules.
Tongue in cheek?
You read into it what you like, but I know what I said, and know how I used the language that I used.
Then is it untrue that you implied that you believe I don't know God, and suggested that I might be delusional instead?
So, if you meet a Buddhist that experiences enlightenment you convert to Buddhism? Because that's generally the equivelant of what you're expecting from me.
That is false. I don't expect you to convert to Christianity unless God decides to call you to it, which I have no reason to think will or won't happen. There are problems with your attitude toward Christianity though, which is my business to hold you accountable for.
Yeah, but you clearly think yourself above me.
Prove it.
If a Buddhist comes to you with a testimony that he is enlightened, you're not about to convert to follow Buddha, because his reality is different from yours.
I have not experienced the Buddha and frankly from what I have observed I don't see much merit in it either. If the Buddha wishes to approach me He knows who to speak to.
Those Christians who believe different from you because their reality is different, are fake Christians.
There is a rule on this website, we aren't allowed to single out and call people fake Christians. However, there are fake Christians and you love to give them the honor they esteem by calling them True Christians when frankly I believe that you do know better. What's up with that?
But, when you say you have a relationship with Christ, I'm supposed to take your reality as fact, and convert to Christianity, despite what my reality is.
That is unbiblical, I do not expect you to convert unless either you have a desire to, or God has a desire to.
You hold me to a different standard than you hold yourself. How is that not believing yourself above me? All Christians do this.
Please explain this, I don't believe I have treated you with double standards.
 
Upvote 0
Jun 18, 2012
251
14
31
Athens Greece
✟22,967.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
They may have existed, and they may not have been exaggerated. However, worldwide floods, burning bushes, people whose superhuman strength comes from their hair, men living in fish, people born of a virgin, who walk and water, and rise from the dead? That certainly sounds exaggerated, if not mythical.

Some of it is symbolic and some is not.
I know that it is true one way or another because Jesus and the Apostoles died for them.
That's all the proof I need.
It's not enough for you. That's fine!


Then why not take food, and why sell clothing for a knife if they're not going to be violent?
If you are really interesed, you can google the position each Chirch takes on the subject.
I do not plan on giviing you a theology lesson.


I just assumed that I needn't put forth anything from the Old Testament, as it is pretty much recognized as a bloodbath.
Ever read the Sermon on the Mountain?


And today, the excuse is?
What happens today? There are some phyckopaths and some m*rons arguing with other m*rons.
These people will always exist. Deal with it.
They are not representative of the whole Christian Community, and to say that every Christian is like them is bigoted and insultive.
How do you know?
I do not know; I believe it. DUH!
I am as much certain for it as much as you are certain that there is no God.


I don't believe myself to be better, and don't see why I'm expected to be.
It is our purpose in life to constantly get better until the day we die.
It is the purpose of the human species.
You must see what is bad and avoid it, instead of adapting and becoming part of the problem.


You clearly don't hold Christians to the same standards you're holding me know. No Christian does.

You are wrong.
I have a lot of friends who are atheists or irreligious. And I respect them more than a lot of jerks who dare to call themselves Christians.

The reason for wich I look down to you isn't because you are an atheist, but because you are a nihilist who's saying that it is OK to be intolerant, since everyone is doing it, it will always be happening and that we should adjust to it.

I can't. It's not for me to fix. I gave up a long time ago. Now, I just try to understand.
That's bullcrap!
You can wanna know what you can and should do to solve a problem like intolerance, racism etc.?
Stop doing it yourself, and incourage other people in your life to quit it too.
Not by force, but by your example of life.
This is all you or I can do, and whether it proves to be pointless or not, you should try for the shake of human dignity.

That's why there's dozens of threads on the Christians Only forums about how atheists are jerks, but none that hold Christians to that same standard. Although, I'm certain I can find several that praise Christians for being jerks.
The same thing goes on to an atheist forum, a muslim forum, a comunist forum...
Do you want me to go on?

I never said there was one. I follow their lead on this. In all honesty, if Christians consider me their enemy (and they do), it would be downright stupid of me to not recognize that by defauly that makes them my enemy.
Wrong; It would be downright stupid of you to prove them right.
Hatred cannot be solved with hatred.
Aproach them, show them that you are a human being just like them, that you share the same problems with them... Make a friend out of them! Or ignore them and show them you are no threat to them.
In any case, BREAK THE SYSTEM MAN!


That doesn't mean you don't hold the belief. It just means that your politically correct.
That's all I am asking. It's OK to disagree with someone or dislike him, but you must be nice with him, and not cuss him, mock him for his belief/lack of beliefs/race etc etc.


People may act a certain way. It doesn't mean that they don't hold themselves above those who are different than they are.
Once again, you are looking for excuses to be the victim.
How do you know what people believe? It is their actions that let you know.
When a Christian is nice with you but you say;
"Yeah that's what he is doing now, but he really believes I am an abomination"
you are a freaking hypocrite.

I'm just saying that's how it is, and there's nothing to be done about it. It's the nature of religion to seek out enemies, and most of the time those enemies are unbelievers. That's simply how religion works.
It is in the (bad) nature of humans to seek out enemies to fight and arrays to join.
It's not neceserily in the nature of religion, and it's definetely not in the nature of Christianity.
Religion is an istitution that tries to bind the sociaty together.
Not tear it apart.
That is why some people dislike you when you reject it.
They believe you become a threat to the balance of sociaty.
I do not hold this belief but to say that my religion is by it's nature bad prompts me to.
The only reason I do not insult or verbally asault you for saying that is not for being politically correct,
but to be a good follower of the Christ.
So not only does my religion not encourage violence, but it is the only thing that keeps me away from it.


Maybe, but that's how it works.
Nazi; Jews are the cause of Germany's poor economic sate and the root of all evil in general.
Me; That sounds pretty bigoted
Nazi;Maybe, but that's how it works.

Christian Fundamentalist; Atheist are a threat to our sociaty's morality and must be secluded and rejected.
Me; That sounds pretty bigoted
Christian Fundamentalist; Maybe, but that's how it works.

Extremist Muslim; Non-muslims are a plague that must be whiped out from the face of the Earth!
Me; That sounds pretty bigoted
Extremist Muslim;Maybe, but that's how it works.
.
.
.
When will you people EVER learn?
The phase "maybe, but that's how it works" ISN'T AN ARGUMENT!!!


That's true. However, statistics show that the more religious someone is, the more racist, bigotted and intollerant of unbelievers they are likely to be.
What statistics show that? The Atheist Sociaty of America's Statistics?

What atheist army? And anti-theists are simply people who hold the belief that there is no God. It's essentially just a strong atheist.
An atheist is a person who says;
I believe that there is no God"
A positive atheist is a person who says;
"There is no God"
An anti-theist is a person who says;
"There is no God and the belief in one is harmful to the sociaty. Religious people must disappear."

I never said that they hadn't. I just said that the more religious someone is, the more likely it is that they are intollerant, bigotted, and racist.
Again, that's bigoted in itself. Besides, what do you mean by saying
"the more religious someone is"? I consider myself to be very religious.
Definetely more than some suiside bombers.

The difference is technology only allows people to kill more. It doesn't actually correlate with hate.
Nor does Christianity. It teaches pacifism, and acceptance of every being that God allows to exist in this World. Humans can be hateful whether they are religious or not.
Like I said;
Religion can be a way through which a person can channel his hatred towards others.
You can take away religion, but it doesn't matter. The cause remains;
He will find another way to cahnnel his hatred;
Political beliefs, the belief that religion is bad and must be extinct (wink, wink) etc etc.

Either religion causes the hatred, or people who are hateful are attracted to religion. In either case, religion is not helping.

It does for me;
to say that my religion is by it's nature bad prompts me to. The only reason I do not insult or verbally asault you for saying that, is not for being politically correct, but to be a good follower of the Christ.
So not only does my religion not encourage violence, but it is the only thing that keeps me away from it.

Besides, it doesn't go beyond my notice that the hatred between political beliefs is somewhat exasperated by bringing religion into it.
I am not an American, so I do not know what goes on out there.
But the soviet Union was pretty violent, but it was an atheist sate.
Hitler and Musolini were violent but they were both atheists.
I am not saying that atheism is causing people to be hateful, I am just saying that religious beliefs are irrelevant.

That's not the point. You're selling religion on it being something beautiful that one is missing out on if they don't experience. And that I'm a coward if I don't want experience it. But the experiences were beautiful, and calming for those who experienced them, but I don't think either of us would want to go through the same thing. Does that really make us cowards, or realists?

No but again his experience wasn't NATURAL! The need to believe is.

People get hungry and thirsty because our bodies need energy to survive. We have a biological drive to get food and water, like all animals.
I know.

Nobody has articulated why we need to aproach something divine
Then why has every human culture in the world developed some short of religon?
It's the same as the need to have friends or to socialise or to create.
It's not just material needs. Every organism has a few unique needs, and human is no exception.
Besides, if you search/read about it, you will realise that it definetely is a human need.

and it's clear that other animals do not seek out God.
Can we really know this? Perhaps they do!
Perhaps they are just not intelligent enough to, or perhaps their way of life makes it unnecessary.

My wife was Jewish. We can coexist. My best friend is Hindu. My partner is Muslim. We can coexist. Christians have made it abundantly clear that they wish not to coexist with atheists, Muslims, gays or Jews. Look at my signature, that pretty much says it all.
So simply because you know people who are muslims/jews/hindus that you care about, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism are OK, but because you haven't a Christian friend, Christianity is bad?!

I've put my life back together after I was excommunicated by my church, and abandoned by my family...because I wanted to marry a Jew. I get to blame that on Christianity. My best friend was driven to suicide when his family, friends and church abandoned him because he was gay. Our pastor then danced on his grave. I get to blame that on Christianity. I still get migranes, because several years ago I was given a concussion by a Christian who assaulted me for being an atheist. I get to blame that on Christianity.
I get to blame these thing on intolerance, and the insecurity of these people concerning their own beliefs.

Our pastor then danced on his grave.
Wha-? Then he is a freaking PHYCKOPATH!
I still get migranes, because several years ago I was given a concussion by a Christian who assaulted me for being an atheist.
WHERE THE HELL DO YOU EVEN LIVE IN?!
ARE YOU MAKING THESE THING UP?
What kind of monsters are you surrounded by?
In any case; Whe I get to see a christian arguing or attacking someone of different beliefs, I don't just sit back and enjoy the show;
I interfere, remind him the teachings of Jesus, and he quits.

I can't solve them, and I do enough for this world just by existing, and doing what I do. I accept that religious intolerance is, as it has always been, a fact of life. All I can do is point it out, and hope that the religious hold themselves to a higher standard of humanity than where they are. However, that will never happen. I'm the religious minority, and Christians will always hate me for not believing in their saviour.
Nihilism at it's finest.
I am sorry, but I happen to hold the belief that every huma being (whether christian/muslim/jew/atheist) in the Earth, has the duty to strive to improve the world, and give the next generations a better place to live in.
People who do not do that live meaningless lives. To simply exist, isn't enough. It's just a waste of oxygen.
But, nevermind, it's your choice...

Anyway, if you have decided that these things happen and that you don't wanna do anything about it, then what's the use of understanding them?
You understand the nature of a problem when you plan to fix it.
If you don't plan to do this, then why bother?
Just seclude yourself from these "Christians" and get on with your life.
Plus, why waste time asking christians to tell you why they are intolerants against you? DO you really expect them to tell you?
Read the Bible, read phyckology, and make your own conclusions.
Don't ask Christians why Christianity sucks so much because it's not really gonna work out.

You're selling religion...
Watch your tongue! I don't sell religion.
The title of this topic is asking why would an atheist come to Christ.
I answered you, because I thought you were sincerely trying to understand.
But I see now that you aren't. Your sole aim is not to "understand" but to provoke.

I am done!
This conversation is clearly going to end up in a misconception since there is no common ground or points of references. I even doubt we give the word "God" the same definition.
And in any case, to willingly and conciously prompt Christians, or any other religious group, and then, when they react to defend their beliefs, whine that they reject you and that they are intolerant against you is hypocritical!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

cburden

Newbie
Jul 2, 2012
21
2
Murray, Ky
✟22,651.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I believe an atheist would come to Christ when they start believing He exists. I don't think they would come to Him for a fear of Hell because to me an atheist is someone who doesn't beleive in any form of religion and since the Bible speaks of Hell, why would an atheist fear it?

So then, is there a reason to believe He exists?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scott1979
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Some of it is symbolic and some is not.
I know that it is true one way or another because Jesus and the Apostoles died for them.
That's all the proof I need.
It's not enough for you. That's fine!



If you are really interesed, you can google the position each Chirch takes on the subject.
I do not plan on giviing you a theology lesson.



Ever read the Sermon on the Mountain?



What happens today? There are some phyckopaths and some m*rons arguing with other m*rons.
These people will always exist. Deal with it.
They are not representative of the whole Christian Community, and to say that every Christian is like them is bigoted and insultive.

I do not know; I believe it. DUH!
I am as much certain for it as much as you are certain that there is no God.



It is our purpose in life to constantly get better until the day we die.
It is the purpose of the human species.
You must see what is bad and avoid it, instead of adapting and becoming part of the problem.




You are wrong.
I have a lot of friends who are atheists or irreligious. And I respect them more than a lot of jerks who dare to call themselves Christians.

The reason for wich I look down to you isn't because you are an atheist, but because you are a nihilist who's saying that it is OK to be intolerant, since everyone is doing it, it will always be happening and that we should adjust to it.


That's bullcrap!
You can wanna know what you can and should do to solve a problem like intolerance, racism etc.?
Stop doing it yourself, and incourage other people in your life to quit it too.
Not by force, but by your example of life.
This is all you or I can do, and whether it proves to be pointless or not, you should try for the shake of human dignity.


The same thing goes on to an atheist forum, a muslim forum, a comunist forum...
Do you want me to go on?


Wrong; It would be downright stupid of you to prove them right.
Hatred cannot be solved with hatred.
Aproach them, show them that you are a human being just like them, that you share the same problems with them... Make a friend out of them! Or ignore them and show them you are no threat to them.
In any case, BREAK THE SYSTEM MAN!



That's all I am asking. It's OK to disagree with someone or dislike him, but you must be nice with him, and not cuss him, mock him for his belief/lack of beliefs/race etc etc.



Once again, you are looking for excuses to be the victim.
How do you know what people believe? It is their actions that let you know.
When a Christian is nice with you but you say;
"Yeah that's what he is doing now, but he really believes I am an abomination"
you are a freaking hypocrite.


It is in the (bad) nature of humans to seek out enemies to fight and arrays to join.
It's not neceserily in the nature of religion, and it's definetely not in the nature of Christianity.
Religion is an istitution that tries to bind the sociaty together.
Not tear it apart.
That is why some people dislike you when you reject it.
They believe you become a threat to the balance of sociaty.
I do not hold this belief but to say that my religion is by it's nature bad prompts me to.
The only reason I do not insult or verbally asault you for saying that is not for being politically correct,
but to be a good follower of the Christ.
So not only does my religion not encourage violence, but it is the only thing that keeps me away from it.



Nazi; Jews are the cause of Germany's poor economic sate and the root of all evil in general.
Me; That sounds pretty bigoted
Nazi;Maybe, but that's how it works.

Christian Fundamentalist; Atheist are a threat to our sociaty's morality and must be secluded and rejected.
Me; That sounds pretty bigoted
Christian Fundamentalist; Maybe, but that's how it works.

Extremist Muslim; Non-muslims are a plague that must be whiped out from the face of the Earth!
Me; That sounds pretty bigoted
Extremist Muslim;Maybe, but that's how it works.
.
.
.
When will you people EVER learn?
The phase "maybe, but that's how it works" ISN'T AN ARGUMENT!!!



What statistics show that? The Atheist Sociaty of America's Statistics?


An atheist is a person who says;
I believe that there is no God"
A positive atheist is a person who says;
"There is no God"
An anti-theist is a person who says;
"There is no God and the belief in one is harmful to the sociaty. Religious people must disappear."


Again, that's bigoted in itself. Besides, what do you mean by saying
"the more religious someone is"? I consider myself to be very religious.
Definetely more than some suiside bombers.


Nor does Christianity. It teaches pacifism, and acceptance of every being that God allows to exist in this World. Humans can be hateful whether they are religious or not.
Like I said;




It does for me;



I am not an American, so I do not know what goes on out there.
But the soviet Union was pretty violent, but it was an atheist sate.
Hitler and Musolini were violent but they were both atheists.
I am not saying that atheism is causing people to be hateful, I am just saying that religious beliefs are irrelevant.



No but again his experience wasn't NATURAL! The need to believe is.


I know.


Then why has every human culture in the world developed some short of religon?
It's the same as the need to have friends or to socialise or to create.
It's not just material needs. Every organism has a few unique needs, and human is no exception.
Besides, if you search/read about it, you will realise that it definetely is a human need.


Can we really know this? Perhaps they do!
Perhaps they are just not intelligent enough to, or perhaps their way of life makes it unnecessary.


So simply because you know people who are muslims/jews/hindus that you care about, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism are OK, but because you haven't a Christian friend, Christianity is bad?!


I get to blame these thing on intolerance, and the insecurity of these people concerning their own beliefs.


Wha-? Then he is a freaking PHYCKOPATH!

WHERE THE HELL DO YOU EVEN LIVE IN?!
ARE YOU MAKING THESE THING UP?
What kind of monsters are you surrounded by?
In any case; Whe I get to see a christian arguing or attacking someone of different beliefs, I don't just sit back and enjoy the show;
I interfere, remind him the teachings of Jesus, and he quits.


Nihilism at it's finest.
I am sorry, but I happen to hold the belief that every huma being (whether christian/muslim/jew/atheist) in the Earth, has the duty to strive to improve the world, and give the next generations a better place to live in.
People who do not do that live meaningless lives. To simply exist, isn't enough. It's just a waste of oxygen.
But, nevermind, it's your choice...

Anyway, if you have decided that these things happen and that you don't wanna do anything about it, then what's the use of understanding them?
You understand the nature of a problem when you plan to fix it.
If you don't plan to do this, then why bother?
Just seclude yourself from these "Christians" and get on with your life.
Plus, why waste time asking christians to tell you why they are intolerants against you? DO you really expect them to tell you?
Read the Bible, read phyckology, and make your own conclusions.
Don't ask Christians why Christianity sucks so much because it's not really gonna work out.


Watch your tongue! I don't sell religion.
The title of this topic is asking why would an atheist come to Christ.
I answered you, because I thought you were sincerely trying to understand.
But I see now that you aren't. Your sole aim is not to "understand" but to provoke.

I am done!
This conversation is clearly going to end up in a misconception since there is no common ground or points of references. I even doubt we give the word "God" the same definition.
And in any case, to willingly and conciously prompt Christians, or any other religious group, and then, when they react to defend their beliefs, whine that they reject you and that they are intolerant against you is hypocritical!

All good points! Thank you. Except that an atheist is one who doesn't believe in God, an anti-theist is one who believes there is no God. Oh, and Hitler was definitely not an atheist. He may not have been a Christian, but he was far from being an atheist.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Take a deep breath, why are you so angry at me?

No I reject the notion that anyone would identify me as being akin to a "True Christian™". Just plain old Christian will do for me thanks.

If you're going to say that you're following Christ, but you say that those other believers are "fake Christians." Doesn't that make you a True Christian (tm)?

Not really, I am reading it for what is said. There is very little in terms of context except that Jesus required her to justify her faith. Once she had justified her faith then He acted upon it. The reason is not clear in the information we have, so you and I are only able to speculate about His reason. I take Him for a good man, so I look for a good reason why He did that and I see it that way. Contrarily you look for a bad reason and you see it that way. Why do you think that is?

Because most Christians, who are looking for a way to condemn their enemies, or people who are different can interpret it that way. More importantly, they can't be wrong. All it takes is a different concept of God and Jesus to one who is more in line with their values. You can point out what other parts of the Bible say, but certain readers emphasize certain parts, and cling to them.

If the woman thought Him as bad as you make Him out to be, she would not have called Him Lord, nor begged for His help, and if He had have not loved her then He would not have given her any attention.

Yes, and some abused wives stay with their husbands because the beatings show they love them.

Instead He encouraged her faith by challenging it and eventually granted her wish. Why do you see that as being bad? Furthermore, why do you see it as being bad if she doesn't?

"Get away from me you dog."
"Please, Master, I'll be your slave."
"Oh, alright then..."

Yeah, I don't see that as good. Besides, the statement was that Jesus was never condescending. I don't see ho we can condemn Ronald, or the Phelps family when they're simply taking a page from Jesus' book.

Jesus was helping the woman, Ronald was insulting you. Can't you see that from assessing the results of their actions?

But remember, we're not talking about the result, we're talking about the intent.

Well go ahead and think yourself a fool. If that is how you prefer to think then I won't argue about it.

I don't think I'm a fool, but the Bible very clearly defines me as one. That doesn't gain it much credibility.

Then is it untrue that you implied that you believe I don't know God, and suggested that I might be delusional instead?

I implied no such thing. How would I know?

That is false. I don't expect you to convert to Christianity unless God decides to call you to it, which I have no reason to think will or won't happen. There are problems with your attitude toward Christianity though, which is my business to hold you accountable for.

Prove it.

Which of our experiences is more valuable: Yours, someone who believes in Christ or Mine, someone who does not?

I have not experienced the Buddha and frankly from what I have observed I don't see much merit in it either. If the Buddha wishes to approach me He knows who to speak to.

That's not exactly how Buddhism works.

There is a rule on this website, we aren't allowed to single out and call people fake Christians. However, there are fake Christians and you love to give them the honor they esteem by calling them True Christians when frankly I believe that you do know better. What's up with that?

How are they fake Christians? Are you saying they don't really believe in Christ. I'm fairly certain they do. They don't believe in God, or heaven, or hell, or sin, or salvation? Again, I'm fairly certain they do. They follow the Christ whose values agree with their own.
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
If you're going to say that you're following Christ, but you say that those other believers are "fake Christians." Doesn't that make you a True Christian (tm)?
No JGG, that expression is claimed and popularized by a sect of Christians who I don't believe are demonstrating the fruit of the Spirit. Remember this verse when assessing a person's claim to Christ:

19 When you follow the desires of your sinful nature, the results are very clear: sexual immorality, impurity, lustful pleasures, 20 idolatry, sorcery, hostility, quarreling, jealousy, outbursts of anger, selfish ambition, dissension, division, 21 envy, drunkenness, wild parties, and other sins like these. Let me tell you again, as I have before, that anyone living that sort of life will not inherit the Kingdom of God.
22 But the Holy Spirit produces this kind of fruit in our lives: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness, and self-control. There is no law against these things!

Especially look at that word "dissension". Christians are not meant to condescend.
Because most Christians, who are looking for a way to condemn their enemies, or people who are different can interpret it that way. More importantly, they can't be wrong. All it takes is a different concept of God and Jesus to one who is more in line with their values. You can point out what other parts of the Bible say, but certain readers emphasize certain parts, and cling to them.
So are you suggesting now that the majority establishes 'right'? That contradicts a lot of what the bible teaches.
Yes, and some abused wives stay with their husbands because the beatings show they love them.

"Get away from me you dog."
"Please, Master, I'll be your slave."
"Oh, alright then..."

Yeah, I don't see that as good. Besides, the statement was that Jesus was never condescending. I don't see ho we can condemn Ronald, or the Phelps family when they're simply taking a page from Jesus' book.
I don't believe Jesus was being condescending. I look instead to see that the woman was insecure in her faith, probably because of some religious teaching that had condescended her. Jesus would have known this, so He provoked her to desperation. Then He challenged her lack of faith. I see it that she felt like a dog and Jesus was resonating with that conviction. The result is that woman went away feeling blessed by God. Ronald and Phelps have not demonstrated that result to you.
But remember, we're not talking about the result, we're talking about the intent.
They are inseperable with Jesus.
I don't think I'm a fool, but the Bible very clearly defines me as one. That doesn't gain it much credibility.
No, your reading of the bible calls you a fool. My reading doesn't, keep that in mind.
I implied no such thing. How would I know?
So then, do you believe that I do know God?
Which of our experiences is more valuable: Yours, someone who believes in Christ or Mine, someone who does not?
To know God as a friend is certainly better than to consider Him an enemy.
That's not exactly how Buddhism works.
Then what good could it possibly offer?
How are they fake Christians? Are you saying they don't really believe in Christ. I'm fairly certain they do. They don't believe in God, or heaven, or hell, or sin, or salvation? Again, I'm fairly certain they do. They follow the Christ whose values agree with their own.
Yes, just as you can identify a tree by its fruit, so you can identify people by their actions. 21 “Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter.

Don't forget that the majority of Christians believe what their pastor preaches and not all pastors follow Jesus. I met a pastor very early in my conversion who I challenged on this point and he said "and what are you going to do about it?". How do you like that response? I would definitely say that guy is the fool of Psalm 14.
 
Upvote 0

Scott1979

Grateful
Jul 12, 2011
750
65
USA
✟23,735.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
So then, is there a reason to believe He exists?


I appreciate the question but I'm not going to get drawn into the never ending debate that has taken over this thread. Religion like many things is based on faith to a certain degree. If you look at the facts it does lay out a foundation for a never ending debate. Reason being is that it brings up 2 questions.....is there 100% proof God exists, no.......is there 100% proof God doesn't exist, no. You have to look at the facts that are presented and make your own decision. I do believe God exists and I also think He made where we wouldn't have 100% proof He exists so we would have faith in Him. To me it's easy to have faith in something when you have no doubt it's real and it's the best. So to answer your question there is some reason to believe He exists but not 100%. You have to look at the evidence that is there and make up your own mind.
 
Upvote 0

cburden

Newbie
Jul 2, 2012
21
2
Murray, Ky
✟22,651.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I appreciate the question but I'm not going to get drawn into the never ending debate that has taken over this thread. Religion like many things is based on faith to a certain degree. If you look at the facts it does lay out a foundation for a never ending debate. Reason being is that it brings up 2 questions.....is there 100% proof God exists, no.......is there 100% proof God doesn't exist, no. You have to look at the facts that are presented and make your own decision. I do believe God exists and I also think He made where we wouldn't have 100% proof He exists so we would have faith in Him. To me it's easy to have faith in something when you have no doubt it's real and it's the best. So to answer your question there is some reason to believe He exists but not 100%. You have to look at the evidence that is there and make up your own mind.

I agree with you. I know that there is no empirical evidence for God's existence and that there is no one who can say for certain that He doesn't exist. But in my experience many Christians talk about it as if they do KNOW with certainty. I've just never heard anyone's personal reasons for believing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scott1979
Upvote 0

Scott1979

Grateful
Jul 12, 2011
750
65
USA
✟23,735.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
I agree with you. I know that there is no empirical evidence for God's existence and that there is no one who can say for certain that He doesn't exist. But in my experience many Christians talk about it as if they do KNOW with certainty. I've just never heard anyone's personal reasons for believing.


Your exactly right. I think some Christians talk with certainty because it is truly what they believe in there heart and sometimes they let there own beliefs get in the way of the facts. I for one believe in God for numerous reasons. A while back my grandmother had been needing to go to the doctor for a very long time and was very much against it. We all tried to talk to her about going and she was stubborn to no end about it. I prayed about it and about 2 days letter my grandfather called my mom and said my grandmother decided to go to the doctor. Now maybe it's just odd timing but you woud have to understand how long and hard we tried to get her to go. I believe that a higher power played a big role in that. Another instance is one day when I was at work I was picking up some equipment out in a field and was hit in the head with a cheater bar when I was trying to chain the equipment down and knocked out. I heard a voice that woke me up. It was a calm, gentle voice. When I came to nobody was around me and I was a good mile or better from the road. Once again I believe a higher power was watching out for me. Another thing about that day was when I came to I was in no pain what so ever. I merely thought I had slipped until I got back to my truck and realized that 28 minutes had passed. I drove back to my work and once I was safe then the pain of what had happened set in on me. I was kept safe on the road while I was driving with no pain or anything.

I think we all have instances in our life we can't explain. People will put there own reasoning to try figure out what happened.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
No JGG, that expression is claimed and popularized by a sect of Christians who I don't believe are demonstrating the fruit of the Spirit. Remember this verse when assessing a person's claim to Christ:

Well, what's the difference? They say that those people aren't real Christians because they disagree with me, a True Christian(tm). You say that they are fake Christians because they don't demonstrate what you think "the fruit of the Spirit" is. Is the sentiment not the same?

So are you suggesting now that the majority establishes 'right'? That contradicts a lot of what the bible teaches.

No, what I'm saying is that the Bible allows anyone to shift the importance of some verses among others so it reflects their values, whatever it is. What I'm saying is that with the Bible, nobody is truly "right," but the majority or minority can never be wrong.

I don't believe Jesus was being condescending. I look instead to see that the woman was insecure in her faith, probably because of some religious teaching that had condescended her. Jesus would have known this, so He provoked her to desperation. Then He challenged her lack of faith. I see it that she felt like a dog and Jesus was resonating with that conviction. The result is that woman went away feeling blessed by God. Ronald and Phelps have not demonstrated that result to you.

Look at the backstory we've added here. We have no idea where this woman was coming from, and yet you've created assumptions to fit your narrative. How would Jesus have known any of it? He must have, because that fits the narrative. He knew she felt like a dog? How? Because it has to fit your narrative. You say you view Jesus as a good man, however, it seems to me He's defined that way. What changes is the view of what a good man is. For most Christians, a good man is cruel, condescending, vengeful, with an acid tongue, and superior to others. So, that's how I interpret it, with the typical Christian view of what a "good man" is.

They are inseperable with Jesus.

How? What does that even mean?

So then, do you believe that I do know God?

I don't believe in God, so I don't know.

To know God as a friend is certainly better than to consider Him an enemy.

That doesn't answer my question: Which of our experiences is more valuable: Yours, someone who believes in Christ or Mine, someone who does not?

And adds another: If I am an enemy of the Christian God, then am I not the enemy of Christians?

Then what good could it possibly offer?

Enlightenment? Inner peace? Abdonment of desires? Oneness with everything? Four hundred million Buddhists seem to get something from it. How do you just disregard their testimony?

Yes, just as you can identify a tree by its fruit, so you can identify people by their actions. 21 “Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter.

Don't forget that the majority of Christians believe what their pastor preaches and not all pastors follow Jesus. I met a pastor very early in my conversion who I challenged on this point and he said "and what are you going to do about it?". How do you like that response? I would definitely say that guy is the fool of Psalm 14.

Which guy? The guy who claimed to know God, or the guy who questioned him on whether he really knew God?

And then how does either scriptually fit into the text of Psalm 14:1: "The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God." Surely both have said that there is a God.
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Well, what's the difference? They say that those people aren't real Christians because they disagree with me, a True Christian(tm). You say that they are fake Christians because they don't demonstrate what you think "the fruit of the Spirit" is. Is the sentiment not the same?
I don't say that those who claim the title "True Christian(TM) are all fake Christians, I believe they are misguided, some might be fake. But you know me better than you let on. They are individuals, yet I don't like the image they portray of Christianity, I won't associate myself with that brand.
No, what I'm saying is that the Bible allows anyone to shift the importance of some verses among others so it reflects their values, whatever it is. What I'm saying is that with the Bible, nobody is truly "right," but the majority or minority can never be wrong.
We'll see.
Look at the backstory we've added here. We have no idea where this woman was coming from, and yet you've created assumptions to fit your narrative.
What does it mean A canaanite woman cried "Lord son of David have mercy on me"? Does that not demonstrate that she felt like a dog compared to the Jews? Consider what the Jews thought and spoke about Canaanites at the time.
How would Jesus have known any of it?
He is omniscient.
He must have, because that fits the narrative. He knew she felt like a dog? How? Because it has to fit your narrative.
Because the bible demonstrates that He is omniscient.
You say you view Jesus as a good man, however, it seems to me He's defined that way. What changes is the view of what a good man is. For most Christians, a good man is cruel, condescending, vengeful, with an acid tongue, and superior to others. So, that's how I interpret it, with the typical Christian view of what a "good man" is.
Maybe that is true in your mind, but that it is not my experience.
How? What does that even mean?
Jesus' intentions are perfectly fulfilled. Gods ways are peculiar, I won't disagree about that, but He never fails.
I don't believe in God, so I don't know.
So what do you think my experience means? Delusion?
That doesn't answer my question: Which of our experiences is more valuable: Yours, someone who believes in Christ or Mine, someone who does not?
I feel that by contrasting my life with and without friendship with God, I feel much better now than I did before. Does that answer your question?
And adds another: If I am an enemy of the Christian God, then am I not the enemy of Christians?
Be that way by your own choice, it does not have to be so.
Enlightenment?
Got it.
Inner peace?
Got it.
Abdonment of desires?
Not interested.
Oneness with everything?
ROFL! Yeah right.
Four hundred million Buddhists seem to get something from it. How do you just disregard their testimony?
I don't. I told you that already. What makes you think I do?
Which guy? The guy who claimed to know God, or the guy who questioned him on whether he really knew God?
This guy was not afraid of God, he was afraid of the truth though.
And then how does either scriptually fit into the text of Psalm 14:1: "The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God." Surely both have said that there is a God.
Yes, but not both believed it in their heart.

After all this JGG, we are still arguing. What is the point of that? Are you getting any closer to understanding why an atheist might come to Christ? I doubt it. You are intent on not opening your mind to the righteousness of Christ, thus you see Him as a "cruel, condescending, vengeful, with an acid tongue, and superior to others". That's not Christ, that's an antichrist argument.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
I don't say that those who claim the title "True Christian(TM) are all fake Christians, I believe they are misguided, some might be fake. But you know me better than you let on. They are individuals, yet I don't like the image they portray of Christianity, I won't associate myself with that brand.

But you do. You're both Christian. You're naturally associated.

What does it mean A canaanite woman cried "Lord son of David have mercy on me"? Does that not demonstrate that she felt like a dog compared to the Jews? Consider what the Jews thought and spoke about Canaanites at the time.

Yes, but I doubt very much that Canaanites agreed with them.

He is omniscient.

Because the bible demonstrates that He is omniscient.

Then it what way can he be a man? Men aren't omniscient.

Jesus' intentions are perfectly fulfilled. Gods ways are peculiar, I won't disagree about that, but He never fails.

Does God intend to have enemies?

So what do you think my experience means? Delusion?

Perhaps. I don't really know.

I feel that by contrasting my life with and without friendship with God, I feel much better now than I did before. Does that answer your question?

Not really, no. It's more of a one or the other answer. Which of our experiences is more valuable: Yours, someone who believes in Christ or mine, someone who does not?

Be that way by your own choice, it does not have to be so.

So I should believe in God, because otherwise God, and His follwers will be my enemies?

Got it.

Got it.

Not interested.

ROFL! Yeah right.

I don't. I told you that already. What makes you think I do?

You just did it. The statements immediately preceding this one ("ROFL! Yeah right.") How are they significantly different from mine, except that I've never used "ROFL"? Can you honestly tell me that you didn't just disregard the testimony of 400 million Buddhists? The difference is, you expect me to accept your testimony, while you mock theirs. That's the double standard I'm talking about.

This guy was not afraid of God, he was afraid of the truth though.

And you had the truth, and not him?

Yes, but not both believed it in their heart.

Which means what?

After all this JGG, we are still arguing. What is the point of that? Are you getting any closer to understanding why an atheist might come to Christ? I doubt it. You are intent on not opening your mind to the righteousness of Christ, thus you see Him as a "cruel, condescending, vengeful, with an acid tongue, and superior to others". That's not Christ, that's an antichrist argument.

Well, didn't you yourself just depict Christ as a person who would declare me His enemy if I don't believe in Him? That doesn't exactly contradict the description.

You'd be surprised at what I am learning.
 
Upvote 0

Scott1979

Grateful
Jul 12, 2011
750
65
USA
✟23,735.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Why don't you guys just agree to disagree and drop this. After 29 pages of going back and forth what conclusion has this topic given you.......nothing.

JGG you seem to want 100%, concrete, no doubt proof of Gods existence and your not going to find it. What you are going to get on here is people telling you what they believe in there heart and that is not going to answer your question of "Why would an atheist come to Christ?". The fact of the matter is that there is no general answer to that question. Oi Antz believes God exists for his own reasons. I believe He exists for my own reasons. Nobody can or should ram there beliefs down anyone elses throat. People can share the experiences they have had in finding Christ but that is really it. I don't think anyone can share anything with you that is going to just knock you over and say "WOW!! He is real!!" What it boils down to is you are going to have to look at the facts that do exist and deicde if you want to truly, and I mean truly open your heart and mind to the idea that He may exist.
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Why don't you guys just agree to disagree and drop this. After 29 pages of going back and forth what conclusion has this topic given you.......nothing.

JGG you seem to want 100%, concrete, no doubt proof of Gods existence and your not going to find it. What you are going to get on here is people telling you what they believe in there heart and that is not going to answer your question of "Why would an atheist come to Christ?". The fact of the matter is that there is no general answer to that question. Oi Antz believes God exists for his own reasons. I believe He exists for my own reasons. Nobody can or should ram there beliefs down anyone elses throat. People can share the experiences they have had in finding Christ but that is really it. I don't think anyone can share anything with you that is going to just knock you over and say "WOW!! He is real!!" What it boils down to is you are going to have to look at the facts that do exist and deicde if you want to truly, and I mean truly open your heart and mind to the idea that He may exist.
I have a hard time agreeing to disagree when my intent is being twisted out of context. Still, I'll wait for JGG to respond to what you say here before I respond to what he has said. I agree with you Scott, we are going nowhere.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Why don't you guys just agree to disagree and drop this. After 29 pages of going back and forth what conclusion has this topic given you.......nothing.

JGG you seem to want 100%, concrete, no doubt proof of Gods existence and your not going to find it.

No I don't. I'm pointing out that belief and knowledge aren't the same thing. It's okay for me to say, "I don't know," "I just don't believe that," or "How do you know?"

What you are going to get on here is people telling you what they believe in there heart and that is not going to answer your question of "Why would an atheist come to Christ?". The fact of the matter is that there is no general answer to that question.

Well, there is a general answer to that question, I just asked for another one.

Oi Antz believes God exists for his own reasons. I believe He exists for my own reasons. Nobody can or should ram there beliefs down anyone elses throat. People can share the experiences they have had in finding Christ but that is really it.

Maybe. But that's not the reality of it. The reality is that it is shoved down our throat, and then we are denigrated, condemned and hated when we don't accept it. I'm going through it again right now, not because I'm an atheist, but because my family isn't Christian. And trust me, Christians don't just believe, they know.

I don't think anyone can share anything with you that is going to just knock you over and say "WOW!! He is real!!" What it boils down to is you are going to have to look at the facts that do exist and deicde if you want to truly, and I mean truly open your heart and mind to the idea that He may exist.

But, if I then say that I don't believe, then I'm another "prideful atheist" as another poster put it. Or more to the point, I am an enemy of Christianity as we've been told. And then I get patronized when I'm told that we non-Christians are not seen as inferior. Just today I listened to a sermon in which the pastor claims the same as you: Non-believers don't believe because God didn't choose them. And yet, throughout the sermon the words he refers to us include: corrupt, ridiciulous, silly, stupid, crazy, lost, blind, evil, illiterate, prideful, hard hearted, lacking in compassion, criminal, and pitiful. But we're equal...

Even the context of your last sentence above essentially says it again: "What it boils down to is you are going to have to look at the facts that do exist and deicde if you want to truly, and I mean truly open your heart and mind to the idea that He may exist..."

Based on the context, the sentence should continue with the word "or..." Why not include how that sentence ends?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Scott1979

Grateful
Jul 12, 2011
750
65
USA
✟23,735.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
No I don't. I'm pointing out that belief and knowledge aren't the same thing. It's okay for me to say, "I don't know," "I just don't believe that," or "How do you know?"

Your exactly right, it is perfectly fine for you to say and ask that.



Maybe. But that's not the reality of it. The reality is that it is shoved down our throat, and then we are denigrated, condemned and hated when we don't accept it. I'm going through it again right now, not because I'm an atheist, but because my family isn't Christian. And trust me, Christians don't just believe, they know.

I agree with you 100%. Some Christians do act like they know when the truth is nobody knows if God exists. It boils down to what you choose to believe.



But, if I then say that I don't believe, then I'm another "prideful atheist" as another poster put it. Or more to the point, I am an enemy of Christianity as we've been told. And then I get patronized when I'm told that we non-Christians are not seen as inferior.

I wouldn't refer to you as prideful. You have obviously looked at the facts and made up your own mind.

Even the context of your last sentence above essentially says it again: "What it boils down to is you are going to have to look at the facts that do exist and deicde if you want to truly, and I mean truly open your heart and mind to the idea that He may exist..."

Based on the context, the sentence should continue with the word "or..." Why not include how that sentence ends?

Maybe I am not understanding the argument going on between you and oi_antz. You took my sentence out of the context I meant. I was simply saying like everyone who decides to follow God and those who don't you will have to search for Him in your own way. That's all. I'm backing out of this now and I do apologize if I have offended you in any way. I am truly sorry for you being treated bad for what you believe. That is not right at all.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Your exactly right, it is perfectly fine for you to say and ask that.

Except I have pages and pages of text in this thread that literally says that I can't say "I don't know." There are other posters who continually inform me that I have to choose a side, either Christ or the anti-Christ. Friend of God, or enemy of God. I know it's okay for me to say "I don't know," Christians don't.
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Except I have pages and pages of text in this thread that literally says that I can't say "I don't know." There are other posters who continually inform me that I have to choose a side, either Christ or the anti-Christ. Friend of God, or enemy of God. I know it's okay for me to say "I don't know," Christians don't.
JGG, you seem content to misread me and I'm not surprised. You are even content to misread the bible. I will also leave this thread now because of that, after trying to get a message through to you yet you keep putting up that wall and won't listen to the point I am trying to make. Perhaps I made the mistake of thinking you came here to learn. Anyway, I'll leave you with what I think is the concise answer to your original question:

Why would an atheist come to Christ, if not to avoid hell?

Because the atheist discovers that Christ's love is worth having.

You have made many arguments why this is not a sufficient reason and the only argument I don't like is the one which you said Christ is cruel etc. You said you have learned a lot in this thread, I can't help but wonder who your teacher was.
 
Upvote 0

LoricaLady

YHWH's
Site Supporter
Jul 27, 2009
19,134
12,763
Ohio
✟1,333,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
"If Hell is not eternal and not a place of punishment eternally, then Jesus dying on the cross was in vain. There was no reason for Him to take away the sins of the world.

Why then would an atheist come to Christ if there was no punishment, no penalty for breaking God's law?"

This is a question among many, put forth by a Christian elsewhere on the board.

Discuss...

Some people come to Messiah as baby believers, naturally, without perfect understanding. They may accept Him but not yet really believe the Bible in full, including the concept of hell. I know because I have been there myself.

Some come because they feel Him calling them, because they have faults they want to get free from and when, out of desperation, they turn to the One they are not even sure is there, they get an answer, help, and begin to believe. I know because I have been there myself.

People come for different reasons, all starting out as babies.

Some saw Messiah risen from the grave, but Scriptures say, still "Some did not believe."

I suspect that those who come only out of fear of hell may be the ones Messiah said do get to Heaven but "Have no reward." He doesn't want us to just fear hell, He wants us to love and serve others out of love for Him and them.
Praying that your faith, and most of all your love, will grow and grow and that your questions will be more and more answered.
 
Upvote 0