You have evidence...
that all sworn testimony...
is perjury?
"You cannot fool all of the people all of the time" - Abraham Lincoln
I agree. Why was there such a problem with Obama wearing a tan suit?
I agree. Why was there such a problem with Obama wearing a tan suit?
Eyewitness testimony from a layperson who doesn’t understand the procedure saying they saw something in the procedure that looked suspicious isn’t evidence. I’ve read a lot of these affidavits, they are largely people saying that something seemed suspicious or unfair. No eyewitness to actual fraud. And as far as I know, not one of these witnesses has come before a judge or been cross examined.If direct firsthand eyewitness testimony, sworn under penalty of perjury charges, is "not evidence"...
everyone else's talk is even cheaper
Just 2 minutes in and this guy is casting dispersion on something not suspicious at all - people using P.O. Boxes where they receive their mail as their address. There is nothing inherently suspicious about this, people clearly didn’t know they could not use their P.O. Box or thought they’d do it anyway and it was no big deal. P.O. Box would have been put in the field for apartment number, naturally. Not an obvious attempt to disguise. And most importantly, we have no reason to think these aren’t legitimate voters. What’s crazy is that anyone would want to disenfranchise these people of their votes because they had the audacity to use a P.O. Box.Like State voter registration data?
So you are saying there is some hope? I'll take it!Her chances in 2020 are almost as good as Donald Trump at this point.
From the "What exactly is 'Kraken'?", files: Why Trump Will Win: “Absolutely frightening” evidence of entrenched fraud.
During his campaign rallies, President Donald Trump proclaimed, "We got 'em all" or "We have it all!" In the coming weeks -- if not days -- Americans will find out specifically what he means.
Those specifics promise to shake Americans to their core by revealing years of entrenched political corruption reflected in electoral fraud.
Lawyer Sidney Powell is providing a preview.
...
“My intent has always been to expose all the fraud I could find and let the chips fall where they may -- whether it be upon Republicans or Democrats."
...
"Kraken" is not a mythical sea monster but a program the CIA and Defense Department use to get information about the nation's enemies by hacking computers and cellphones.
The program includes various forms of malware, such as viruses, Trojan horses and remote-control systems -- and even was used against ostensible allies.
In 2017, WikiLeaks released numerous CIA documents detailing "Kraken."
...
"You have to realize how many forces -- including many in the government -- have benefited from this system. They knew it worked the way it worked, and they used it to install the people they wanted to install in particular offices.
No, you cannot claim a PO box at the UPS or FedEx store as a legal residence for voting purposesJust 2 minutes in and this guy is casting dispersion on something not suspicious at all - people using P.O. Boxes where they receive their mail as their address. There is nothing inherently suspicious about this, people clearly didn’t know they could not use their P.O. Box or thought they’d do it anyway and it was no big deal. P.O. Box would have been put in the field for apartment number, naturally. Not an obvious attempt to disguise. And most importantly, we have no reason to think these aren’t legitimate voters. What’s crazy is that anyone would want to disenfranchise these people of their votes because they had the audacity to use a P.O. Box.
I am sorry but Cthulu is not available right now, please leave your name after the beep!
Seriously 100 million tenticle written postal votes and not one electoral vote! I call foul! Forget the Kraken!
Seriously man, why do you think this 'proves' there was fraud? Someone points out some data and calls it a 'prime indicator of fraud' - so what? Do you seriously believe that 'proves' something? That it is simply the only possible interpretation of that data? If so, why?
I hope the Supreme Court does hear a case because I think that may be what it takes to get people to realize the election fraud claims were false.
. That America has become a banana republic dictatorship . Trump didn’t get the popular vote and he’s not getting the EC either . The only way he’d win is by coup.And if they side in with Trump's side what will you then realize?
The data does take one to the place or should that it's more likely by the law of probability that there was massive fraud therefore you reject the results.
So the Supreme Court is only right and just if they agree with you? The other posters stated that if the SC sides against Trump that's the thing it will take to make people realize the fraud claims were false.. That America has become a banana republic dictatorship . Trump didn’t get the popular vote and he’s not getting the EC either . The only way he’d win is by coup.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?