• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

WHY THE LORD'S DAY IS NOT SATURDAY

Status
Not open for further replies.

HIM

Friend
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
4,994
2,048
59
Alabama
Visit site
✟566,907.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Heaven and earth are still here. All has not been fulfilled. Jesus has not returned to establish the new heaven and earth. And the Kingdom has not been placed back into the Father's hands.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
4,994
2,048
59
Alabama
Visit site
✟566,907.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Or it is and ignored it so they grieved the Spirit away in that respect.
The Sabbath as to which day has been an issue for some time, but In the Christian community the Decalogue was never in question until the beginning of the last century. Now look, it is a make as you will.
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,302
2,555
55
Northeast
✟241,164.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Heaven and earth are still here. All has not been fulfilled. Jesus has not returned to establish the new heaven and earth. And the Kingdom has not been placed back into the Father's hands.
You guys are both bright, so I'm trying to figure out how this works in your minds.

The line of reasoning presented would apply to the entire law. Yet I think we all agree that some things have passed from the law, such as animal sacrifices.

Animal sacrifices have passed from the law, yet the physical heaven and Earth are still here.

How does that work in your minds?
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
4,994
2,048
59
Alabama
Visit site
✟566,907.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Context does not allow for that. And there is a difference between laws, statutes and judgments.
 
Reactions: Leaf473
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
13,831
5,613
European Union
✟236,249.00
Country
Czech Republic
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
They run from place to place, but in the end, they will finish with something like "Only the 10 commandments are the Law, the rest is something else".

Which is not biblical, of course, and can be debunked in seconds. But they have no other choice, when forced to say it clearly. Thats why they stay in being vague and unclear.
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,302
2,555
55
Northeast
✟241,164.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Context does not allow for that. And there is a difference between laws, statutes and judgments.
Do you mean that Jesus is saying that he didn't come to destroy some of the laws and some of the prophets? And that until heaven and Earth pass away, some of the jots and tittles will not pass away?
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,302
2,555
55
Northeast
✟241,164.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
As I understand it, "the law and the prophets" is how people at that time referred to what we call the Old Testament.

Acts 13:15
After the reading of the law and the prophets, the rulers of the synagogue sent to them, saying, “Brothers, if you have any word of exhortation for the people, speak.”

This link may be helpful,
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
4,994
2,048
59
Alabama
Visit site
✟566,907.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Do you mean that Jesus is saying that he didn't come to destroy some of the laws and some of the prophets? And that until heaven and Earth pass away, some of the jots and tittles will not pass away?
No, I mean nothing. The context of the passage does not support what you are purporting.
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,302
2,555
55
Northeast
✟241,164.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No, I mean nothing. The context of the passage does not support what you are purporting.
Also from the sermon on the Mount

Matthew 7:12
Therefore, whatever you desire for men to do to you, you shall also do to them; for this is the law and the prophets.

If you take that to refer only to laws, and not statutes, judgments, ordinances, or commandments, then
thanks
That answers my question of how it works in your mind.

Peace be with you, my friend!
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
4,994
2,048
59
Alabama
Visit site
✟566,907.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The context of the passage in it's entirety.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,255
6,246
Montreal, Quebec
✟305,170.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Heaven and earth are still here. All has not been fulfilled. Jesus has not returned to establish the new heaven and earth. And the Kingdom has not been placed back into the Father's hands.
I will repeat an argument I have made many, many time and which I believe has never been challenged (often this argument is all too conveniently ignored by those who believe the Law is still in force):

There is a way to faithfully read Matt 5:17-18 and still claim that Law of Moses was retired 2000 years ago. In Hebrew culture, “end of the world” language was commonly used metaphorically to invest commonplace events with theological significance.

This is not mere speculation – we have concrete evidence. Isaiah writes:

10For the stars of heaven and their constellations
Will not flash forth their light;
The sun will be dark when it rises
And the moon will not shed its light


What was going on? Babylon was being destroyed, never to be rebuilt. There are other examples of use of “end of the world” imagery to describe much more “mundane” events within the present space-time manifold.

So it is possible that Jesus is not referring to the destruction of matter, space, and time as the criteria for the retirement of the Law. But what might He mean here? What is the real event for which “heaven and earth passing away” is an apocalyptic metaphor?

It is Jesus’ death on the Cross where He proclaims “It is accomplished”. Note how this dovetails perfectly with the 5:18 declaration that the Law would remain until all is accomplished. Seeing things this way allows us to honour the established tradition of metaphorical end-of-the-world imagery and to take Paul at his word in his many statements which clearly denote the work of Jesus as the point in time at which Law of Moses was retired.
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
4,994
2,048
59
Alabama
Visit site
✟566,907.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
it was not said in the post you responded to the law was still in force as you imply. And it is not Matt 5:17,18 that needs faithfully read it is the sermon in it's entirity.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,255
6,246
Montreal, Quebec
✟305,170.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
So can something set apart holy by God end up being unsanctified not lasting?
I believe so, yes. Consider the tent of meeting from the book of Genesis (or was it Exodus). Anyway, that tent was certainly "sanctified" by God and yet God later does away with it.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,255
6,246
Montreal, Quebec
✟305,170.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
it was not said in the post you responded to the law was still in force as you imply.
Your post to which I was responding was itself a response to another poster who had written this:

b) You believe that Jesus instructions to Jews before his death and resurrection apply still today (I noticed you had quite a hard time to find any instruction regarding keeping the Sabbath, though, you found only the opposite)

It seems reasonable to me to conclude that your post challenged this claim - that you believe at least some of the Law of Moses remains in force. If I am mistaken in this attribution, please let me know.

Either way, my argument is what it is - an as yet unchallenged argument that, despite appearances to the contrary, Matt 5 does not force us to conclude that the Law remains in force until the end of the world.

And it is not Matt 5:17,18 that needs faithfully read it is the sermon in it's entirity.
Well, please go ahead and make your case, or point me to posts where you have done so.
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,302
2,555
55
Northeast
✟241,164.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The context of the passage in it's entirety.
Right, if you take the context of the passage in its entirety to refer only to laws, and not statutes, judgments, ordinances, or commandments, then thanks,
I feel like I understand how this works in your thinking

Peace be with you, my friend
 
Upvote 0

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
11,028
6,446
Utah
✟855,966.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
...Because that's reserved for the Sabbath.

Comments and criticisms are welcomed.
Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath ..... (He's not the Lord of nothing) .... Jesus kept the 7th day Sabbath and we are called to follow in His steps.

Peter said, “Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps” (1 Pet. 2:21)
 
Upvote 0

BeyondET

Earth Treasures
Site Supporter
Jul 17, 2018
3,298
677
Virginia
✟223,072.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I believe so, yes. Consider the tent of meeting from the book of Genesis (or was it Exodus). Anyway, that tent was certainly "sanctified" by God and yet God later does away with it.
In a since it has, no particular day is needed, for the Sabbath is Today.

Romans 4

6Since, then, it remains for some to enter His rest, and since those who formerly heard the good news did not enter because of their disobedience, 7God again designated a certain day as “Today,” when a long time later He spoke through David as was just stated: “Today, if you hear His voice, do not harden your hearts.”
8For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.

9There remains, then, a Sabbath rest for the people of God.

10For whoever enters God’s rest also rests from his own work, just as God did from His. 11Let us, therefore, make every effort to enter that rest, so that no one will fall by following the same pattern of disobedience.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,255
6,246
Montreal, Quebec
✟305,170.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No, I mean nothing. The context of the passage does not support what you are purporting.
Can you please answer the question that Leaf posed to you. Here it is again:

Do you mean that Jesus is saying that he didn't come to destroy some of the laws and some of the prophets? And that until heaven and Earth pass away, some of the jots and tittles will not pass away?

I believe the question is well posed and clear enough to enable you to answer. Or even if you do not like the question, I will ask my own version. I assume (correct me if I am wrong) that you believe (a) that some elements of the Law of Moses remain in force and while others are no longer in force; and (b) that "all has not been accomplished yet". If that is indeed your position, please explain how you reconcile that view with this statement of Jesus:

For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not [g]the smallest letter or stroke of a letter shall pass from the Law, until all is accomplished!

It seems to me difficult to support the view that I assume you hold (see above) with this statement from Jesus - it seems impossible, given what Jesus says (above), to hold the view that some parts of the Law have been done away already since, per my assumption about what you believe, not all has been accomplished yet.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Leaf473
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,255
6,246
Montreal, Quebec
✟305,170.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath ..... (He's not the Lord of nothing) .... Jesus kept the 7th day Sabbath and we are called to follow in His steps.
I disagree - I believe Jesus intentionally broke the Sabbath as a way of signalling that the Law of Moses was coming to an end. Consider this from Matthew

At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath, and His disciples became hungry and began to pick the heads of grain and eat. 2 Now when the Pharisees saw this, they said to Him, “Look, Your disciples are doing what is not lawful to do on a Sabbath!

Now I am aware that Jesus "defends" His actions and at least appears to claim innocence. Those, like you, who believe the Sabbath is still in force understandably argue, not least based on Jesus's explanation, that He is not breaking the Sabbath. Fair enough. But look at this from Exodus 16:

Now on the sixth day they gathered twice as much bread, [o]two omers for each one. When all the leaders of the congregation came and told Moses, 23 then he said to them, “This is what the Lord [p]meant: Tomorrow is a Sabbath observance, a holy Sabbath to the Lord. Bake what you will bake and boil what you will boil, and all that is left over [q]put aside to be kept until morning.” 24 So they put it aside until morning, as Moses had ordered, and it did not stink nor was there a maggot in it. 25 Then Moses said, “Eat it today, for today is a Sabbath to the Lord; today you will not find it in the field. 26 Six days you shall gather it, but on the seventh day, the Sabbath, there will be [r]none.”

It certainly seems that "being hungry" is no excuse for violating the Sabbath. Or, putting in another way, if, as required by Exodus, there was to be no gathering of manna on the Sabbath, it seems hard to imagine how it would be defensible for Jesus to pick grains on the Sabbath.

In any event, I think there are a myriad of other Biblical reasons to believe the Sabbath is now no longer in force even if this argument of mine is not convincing.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,488
5,544
USA
✟714,900.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Can you please point out where it says the Sabbath is “today” and contradicts God where God said the Sabbath is the seventh day Exodus 20:10 Hebrews does not say the Sabbath is today and the author of Hebrews knows we are not supposed to add or subtract from the commandments Deut 4:2. The law of God is perfect Psalms 19:7 so no changes needed or allowed. Proverbs 30:5-6

What Hebrews 4 does says is “Today” if you hear His voice do not harden your heart Hebrews 4:7

Which the author is quoting David from Psalms 95. The author is also warning about being disobedient to God Hebrews 4:6 and in particular the Sabbath Ezekiel 20:13 Which we are not to follow the same path of disobedience. Hebrews 4:11 Let us therefore be diligent to enter that rest, lest anyone fall according to the same example of disobedience And we must cease our works the way God did from His Hebrews 4:10 on the seventh day Hebrews 4:4 which is from the foundation of the world Genesis 2:1-3
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.