Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Women are permitted to walk around topless, in Sweden, if they please, but I've never seen this, anywhere. Men, do not walk around, topless, either. Not, in the city. At the sauna, everyone is nude. This, is not something, that is sexualised. No, not at all. At the beach, also, people are nude, sometimes. In the city centre, you would not see anyone, who was topless, unless, they were trying, to cause a scene.
This thread, on this nominally Christian forum, is an example of just how far the West has fallen away from Biblical standards on morality and from Christianity itself. There will be a remanent of those faithful to the Lord to uphold the doctrines and standards of Christianity amidst the chorus of darkness which engulfs the United States and Western culture. This is a battle between light and darkness. Where do you stand?
That assumes rape is about sexual intent. Most studies I have seen say sexual assault is more about power than sex. I would look for other reasons their rate is lower.
With the arrival of warm weather in the US, we again face the double standard of allowing men, but--in most places--not allowing women to go topless in public. Why not?
Would those who are opposed to women going topless in public please address the following:
1). At no place in Scripture are women forbidden from going topless in public.
2). 1 Timothy 2:9 tells us that women are to “dress modestly,” however “modestly” is defined as “adorning themselves, not with elaborate hairstyles or gold or pearls or expensive clothes.” Going topless is never mentioned. Nudity was actually much more common in Biblical times.
3). Romans 14:13 tells us not to put a stumbling block or hindrance in the way of a brother, but the allure of female breasts would diminish if women would regularly go topless in places where men commonly go topless. In addition we allow men to go topless in America(something that was illegal less than 100 years ago) with no concern that they might be placing a stumbling block or hindrance in the way of women.
4). Even if Scripture did forbid women from going topless, the US is a secular nation.
5). Men obviously can handle seeing women go topless because women regularly do so in many parts of the world.
6). If we are "created equal," how can we allow men to go without a shirt in public without allowing women to do the same?
I can think of some pretty good reasons:
- Men's breasts are not sexual in the way women's are. By that I mean, they are not only less sensitive but they aren't sexual in the sense that they serve no pro-creative function, unlike women's for breastfeeding young. The comparison of "equalness" falls short because we aren't comparing apples to apples from a strictly biological standpoint.
- While it may be true that in cultures where bare breasted women in public are the norm, this isn't true for Western culture and a bare breasted female in most public places (outside of areas where it may be accepted like the beach or in circumstances such as breastfeeding) can give out a signal that may be interpreted as sexual in nature.
That can lead to unwanted advances or worse - rape - while men typically do not need to be concerned about this just by going without a shirt.
- As a few women stated, a lot of women would have to get on board for barebreasted in public to become anything like the norm - and I can tell you as a male I personally would not be excited about it - if only because it would mean seeing much more than I would WANT to see from the obese, the old, super sag etc.
Oh wowThere's a lot of those you just won't want to see...like the ones where it looks like they got a couple kids with progeria in a headlock....
in roman times the slaves were totally naked and were not allowed to wear clothes
in roman times the slaves were totally naked and were not allowed to wear clothes
My understanding is that Roman slaves were naked at the time that they were auctioned, but thereafter wore clothing appropriate to their position.
Roman Slaves Clothing
This guy gets it.
There's a lot of those you just won't want to see...like the ones where it looks like they got a couple kids with progeria in a headlock....
There are a lot of hairy, gross men I don't want to see with their shirts off. I say no one should be allowed to be exposed if we base it upon how appearance might affect other people.
Because any argument against women going topless is going to apply to men as well.
Because any argument against women going topless is going to apply to men as well.
Because any argument against women going topless is going to apply to men as well.
No, It doesn't .
I thought of this thread when I read this article just now:
Venice Beach neighborhood council seeks topless sunbathing for women - LA Times
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?