Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why don't you just impress us all by pulling out all that conclusive scientific evidence for a common ancestor between apes and man. That magical nonhuman creature?I wonder if he thinks his magical use of the word magical will magically make the scientific evidence magically go away.
So they can't use overall?
It's neither my stand nor my theory. As I already explained, it's a feature of a number of origin hypotheses. They're predictions or extrapolations of the principles of quantum mechanics I linked to in earlier posts.Please quote your source and support your stand that the cosmos could be created from nothing
and that we can test your theory with the goal of disproving it.
Please quote your source and support your best tested theory that matter appears from nothing and created our Cosmos. I'd like to test your favorite theory with the intention of proving it wrong.However, the flaw in this argument is that, consistent with the best-tested, and most successful theory of how our reality behaves, matter (and antimatter) does appear out of 'nothing' - when 'nothing' means 'a state without matter or forces, only quantum fields' (which is usually what is meant when physicists talk of 'nothing').
I'm sorry you're having difficulty understanding my posts, but I've already addressed that.Please quote your source and support your stand.
Please quote your source and explain something from nothing in scientific or layman's terms. Not cite your source, though that's important as well.I'm sorry you're having difficulty understanding my posts, but I've already addressed that.
The idea is a bit complex and is explained in layman's terms in the video that he linked.Please quote your source and explain something from nothing in scientific or layman's terms. Not cite your source, though that's important as well.
Sorry my request was not explained well enough.
The video was offline and would not play.The idea is a bit complex and is explained in layman's terms in the video that he linked.
The video was offline and would not play.
I provided a working vid...but it was not entertaining enough for me.
What I did see was pure marketing. And I have a degree in marketing.
I said nothing about common ancestry. I'm relying entirely on observed genetic variation in contemporary humans. That variation is inconsistent with a recent expansion from a very small population. You just cannot get the variation from a small population.Is that conclusive or theoretical? Your model asserts a common ancestor between apes and man when you don't know what the creature was nor is there any DNA.
Yeah, I'm confused. Because your response didn't refute my claim, or even have anything obvious to do with it.My response refuted your claim with actual data. Now you're confused?
Their growth rate has not been substantially limited by a shortage of resources (by which I mean food).If there is a 2% growth in parts of Africa which doubles every 35 years then it is not because of unlimited resources like we have in the west.
Sure, we can look at it overall. Looked at overall, populations almost never grow exponentially for very long. So why are you assuming the human population has grown exponentially for thousands of years?So we cannot look at it overall?
Pointing out that your model is certain to be wrong is "making excuses"? How about instead of empty accusations, you provide some empirical evidence to support your model? Where is the evidence that the humans population was growing at the same rate 1000 years ago as today? 2000 years ago?It sounds to me like you are making excuses.
What is your source for experiments regarding quantum fluctuations creating matter out of nothing, if not special pleading?
Most people are spiritual and believe in an intelligence bigger than themselves, so it's not a small group.
"In quantum physics, a quantum fluctuation (or quantum vacuum fluctuation or vacuum fluctuation) is the temporary change in the amount of energy in a point in space, as explained in Werner Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.Quantum fluctuation - Wikipedia
This allows the creation of particle-antiparticle pairs of virtual particles."
Empirical evidence of Quantum fluctuations is to be found in the Casimir effect.
No marketing in the video that was provided to you.
Have you ever studied color psychology?Everything is marketing.
Have you ever studied color psychology?
There's a reason Burger King's sign is red, yellow, and blue.
Baseless, fantasy-based assertions and question begging also do not count as evidence.No evidence was generated.
The creation week consisted of a series of miracles over a period of six days that raised the level of mass/energy in the universe from zero to what it is now.
And yet you could not identify any.Marketing principals use methods of persuasion and influence.
There are certain sequences of provided information that are tuned to instill authority.
A person can be "bribed" using information they know, and tieing it to the "promoted" idea
to make is sound plausible.
There are 30 more "triggers".
Everything is marketing.
A myth is simply a fact you choose to not believe.
Who said they did?Baseless, fantasy-based assertions and question begging also do not count as evidence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?