You are free to reject any science that doesn't agree with your twisted interpretation, when you do so though you are no longer able to claim that "science agrees 100%", it's that simple.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Genesis 1:8 shows that God the Trinity made the FIRST firmament, which He called "Heaven" on the 2nd Day. Gen 2:4 shows that Lord God/Jesus made other HeavenS (plural) on the 3rd Day. That makes at least 3 Heavens.
Adam's Earth, made in the first heaven DID. Gen 1:8
- Science does not agree that Earth existed before stars existed.
Science is ignorant of the Earth where Humanity began. You should tell them.
- Science does not agree that water existed before stars existed.
Tell them to go to Lake Van, Turkey and they will find Adam's firmament on the bottom of the Lake covered in 11k years of volcanic sediment.
- Science has no "firmament or alternate universe extricating into this universe" proposition, so this proposition doesn't agree with science.
Adam's Earth was made billions of years BEFORE the Big Bang of our Cosmos. Each of God's Days/Ages is some 4.5 billion years, in man's time. Today is the 6th Day.
- Science has not confirmed the existence of grass before Dinosaurs existed. Even if you are right and Science is ignorant of some firmament or alternative universe extricating into this universe that did have grass before Dinosaurs, the fact remains that Science still has not confirmed the existence of grass before Dinosaurs, so this still fails.
Science cannot show the process nor can it be repeated which changes Apes into Humans (descendants of Adam). It's because Apes are NOT the Human kind. One must believe in Magic and have great Faith in the ToE.
- Science shows Humans having evolved over time from an ape ancestor shared with Chimpanzees, Bonobos, and other great apes, with emergent intelligence resulting from our evolution. Science does NOT show any evidence of an introduced "Human Race" from another universe/firmament.
Science falsely ASSUMES that Humans MUST have evolved from Apes since they are "willingly ignorant" of what God told us in Genesis.
- Science shows no evidence of Intelligent Humans existing for billions of years before this Universe began. Instead, it shows Humans are an emergent species of Ape that have come about in the last couple of hundred thousand years or so.
Doesn't matter since "every living creature that moveth" came from L.U.C.A. whose origin was in WATER exactly as Gen 1:21 clearly states. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/.../behold-luca-last-universal-common-ancestor-life..
- Science shows Whales coming from Land Mammals and did not exist before land animals existed.
ALL animals had their origin in Water according to Science. So far, you're batting zero. Try again?
- Science shows Birds also coming from Land animals, so they too couldn't have existed before land animals existed.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY!You are free to reject any science that doesn't agree with your twisted interpretation, when you do so though you are no longer able to claim that "science agrees 100%", it's that simple.
This thread still going? Ok I got a question for you naysayers and evolutionists...
Is the scientific second law of thermodynamics true?
This thread still going? Ok I got a question for you naysayers and evolutionists...
Is the scientific second law of thermodynamics true?
I'm going to say yes, it is "true", why do you ask?
Oh boy I cant wait to spring this trap so I'll bite. The second law of thermodynamics describes an observed phenomenon so in that sense yes it is "true".
Lol, ok. You answer too.
Spring it on me. I don't understand.
Well I was thinking about it, and it occured to me that...if the 2nd law of thermodynamics is true (I'm not refuting that, I do believe it), then...how do you scientificologists (Lol) reconcile this with your beliefs?
Well I was thinking about it, and it occured to me that...if the 2nd law of thermodynamics is true (I'm not refuting that, I do believe it), then...how do you scientificologists (Lol) reconcile this with your beliefs?
The 2nd law of thermodynamics states that everything moves from order to disorder.
So how could evolution be true?
How do you reconcile that within yourselves?
The second law of thermodynamics is a limiting factor in a CLOSED system. Our planet is not in a closed system, as we are constantly receiving energy from the sun.This thread still going? Ok I got a question for you naysayers and evolutionists...
Is the scientific second law of thermodynamics true?
Then why don't Mercury & Venus have more advanced life on them?Go out during the day, look up. See that giant ball of nuclear infernus? We call it the sun.
It feeds the earth with workable energy 24/7.
Mercury is too small to hold a proper atmosphere. Venus, however, is an interesting case. If its atmosphere wasn't so thick with greenhouse gases, it's possible that it would be cool enough for heat loving organisms, such as archaea that live in hot springs, to exist there. I wish I knew more about the planet so I could go into more detail.Then why don't Mercury & Venus have more advanced life on them?
Then why don't Mercury & Venus have more advanced life on them?
Proper atmosphere for what?Mercury is too small to hold a proper atmosphere.
So?Perhaps because day-time surface tempuratures are high enough to melt lead?
I guess, though, if anything could live on Mercury, it'd be very alien indeed.Proper atmosphere for what?
Creatures that live two planets farther out?
You're comparing apples to oranges.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?