Phred said:
I don't know of any that have directly said that... what I do know is how I feel when statements like
this are made:
[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Bush: No, I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God.[/font]
Do you have a source for this or is this just another of the many false statements you guys attribute to President Bush?
The site you linked to said that this took place at "a formal news conference". If this were true then surely, there must be a bona fide journalistic source for this.
You see, my post isn't about the validity of Christianity... it's about why many seem to think I have to be Christian in order to be considered an American.
Again, who has said this? So far, you've offered a dubious quote from a biased source.
Yup, all irrelevant to my post. When the chief judge of a state supreme court puts a momument to his particular deity into a public courthouse, that suggests people will be tried according to his belief and not our law.
But it's not irrelevant at all. Our laws and virtually all of our founding documents are based, at least in part, on these things.
The establishment clause protects us from any religion being preferred by the state over any other... or none.
Actually, that's not what the establishment clause says.
Commandments 1, 2 and 3 are specifically related to religion, enforcing them would be establishing religion.
But who is enforcing them?
Again, in hurrying to the defense of your faith, you miss the point. I saw Christians lining up to take their kids to see a movie that normally they would be screaming against.
So what is this to you? It's no more of your business what movies these people take their kids to see, anymore than it's their business what movies you take your kids to see.
How does the idea that someone allowed their kids to see a movie you disagree with show that you're being persecuted?
You don't think this is perceived as how Christian morality is easily changed to suit? If it serves a Christian purpose, raging violence is fine... otherwise it's smut.
What in the world are you talking about? What has any of this to do with "Christian morality" and, again, what is it to you what other parents let their kids see? Worry about your own life.
In the meantime, anyone who criticized this movie... Jesus really not being white and so on, was labeled anti-Christian. Not wrong, but wrong with malace.
Really? Who has said this?
Or is this another case of "well, nobody's actually said it. It's just a feeling I get"?
Really? Wouldn't know it if you hadn't told me. Check
here...
I didn't say that there weren't individual Christians who wanted organized prayer in schools. I said the church, in general.
Notice that First Things, a
Christian magazine with a large circulation among Christians and which has an blatantly conservative Christian worldview, does not name one person or group. It merely addresses the idea that individuals may favor it.
Second, notice that the prayer that is being discussed here is
voluntary. A student may pray or not and he may pray to the diety of his choice. There is no conspiracy in this article to force prayer on anyone, only to protect the rights of those who choose to excercise their religious beliefs in a public forum.
You may pray, anytime... anyplace. What you can't do is force your belief upon others. Pretty simple. So why do some Christians insist upon forcing children to say a prayer each and every day?
Who is forcing anyone to pray? Are you equally outraged about the fact that school children are punished or are otherwise not allowed to pray?
Won't see what you don't want to see... huh?
See what? So far, you haven't shown me anything.