section9+1
Well-Known Member
Self-justification is the most determined preoccupation of mankind.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I thought this was a debating forum, I'm not impressed.
You quote Timothy 4:3, but you cant seem to interpret the context of Matt 5.
All husbands are sinners if lust is universal. If lust is defined as being outside of marriage, then lusting after unmarried women is not sinful. The context of adultery in the OT was specific to another man's wife.
If I'm wrong, then please explain. I'm not trying to justify any behaviour, i just hate religious slogans that have no truth.
The thing is that Jesus is not against violence. He will return one day and do violence to those who will seek to harm Him and He will bring them to an end. However, sex is a sacred act behind close doors between a man and a woman. God never shows us that sex is something to be displayed for all the world to see. This would lead people to think of such a thing as no longer sacred or special anymore (As God intended to be). See, the problem is that you do not agree with God and His Word in regards to sexual immorality. Porn is wrong because it is fornication (i.e. sex outside of marriage and it invites people to engage in fornciation by it's publication). The Bible says whoremongers will be cast into the Lake of Fire. That's it. There is no debate. God says that is what is going to happen to people who are sexually immoral. End of discussion. God will have the last word on Judgment day against all sinners or those who are wicked....
Yes, it would seem so.Self-justification is the most determined preoccupation of mankind.
By sacred do you mean inviolable?
Just because something is displayed doesn't necessarily reduce it's sacredness. Churches display worship for all the world to see, yet no one would say that church worship isn't sacred.However, sex is a sacred act behind close doors between a man and a woman. God never shows us that sex is something to be displayed for all the world to see. This would lead people to think of such a thing as no longer sacred or special anymore (As God intended to be).
On a forum? Not likely!End of discussion.
Yes, it would seem so.
Just because something is displayed doesn't necessarily reduce it's sacredness. Churches display worship for all the world to see, yet no one would say that church worship isn't sacred.
chaela said:On a forum? Not likely!
Do not even know about that other word.
Sacred as in holy, separate, special, set apart.
...
I thought this was a debating forum, I'm not impressed.
You quote Timothy 4:3, but you cant seem to interpret the context of Matt 5.
All husbands are sinners if lust is universal. If lust is defined as being outside of marriage, then lusting after unmarried women is not sinful. The context of adultery in the OT was specific to another man's wife.
If I'm wrong, then please explain. I'm not trying to justify any behaviour, i just hate religious slogans that have no truth.
What is the rational explanation about why pornography is wrong?
There is nothing wrong with it. Two people engaging in the most natural act possible. All you need is your God given body. God gave us our bodies for a reason and admire the Bible states "we are made in his image". Therefore using our bodies made in his image is completely natural and sin free. There are no Biblical restrictions on filming and viewing these natural acts of love.
There is nothing wrong with it. Two people engaging in the most natural act possible. All you need is your God given body. God gave us our bodies for a reason and as the Bible states "we are made in his image". Therefore using our bodies made in his image is completely natural and sin free. There are no Biblical restrictions on filming and viewing these natural acts of love.
That doesn't make any sense.
But God's Word says,
"But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death." (Revelation 21:8).
...
Just because something is displayed doesn't necessarily reduce it's sacredness. Churches display worship for all the world to see, yet no one would say that church worship isn't sacred.
He doesn't allow for the public display of worship, either, and there seems to be more agreement on what that is than on what constitutes sexual immorality. Yet churches abound.But God does not allow for sexual immorality within His Word.
Yes revalations is very symbolic. Intercourse itself does not qualify for whoremongering otherwise many of us would be in trouble!