Why Is Darwinism So Dangerous? (5)

[Subduction Zone]

Sure it is. Humanity is the result of entirely naturalistic processes according to the creationist theory taught in schools. Humans were created, over a long period of time, only by naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago. While you may not like it, that's creationism of the atheistic kind.

There are no creation theories taught in schools.

No Christian accepts Godless evolution. Stop trying to suggest they do.

What do you mean "godless evolution"? All science is "godless". Are you saying that no Christian believes in Godless Gravity? How about Godless Thermodynamics?

Why do you have a bone to pick with evolution? Is it because it shows that your own version of God is wrong?

You sure like labeling others as liars. That's frequent in your posts. If the admins don't have a problem with it, I don't. I realize the spirit which is behind such language.

This time you took the label on yourself. I have yet to meet an honest creationist. Sooner or later they act very dishonest or accept evolution. Look at you, you are afraid to learn what evidence is.

And yet one more empty claim.

Sorry, that would be you. I have offered more than once to supply the evidence you desire. You will not "pay" a very low price for it. I told you that it is not free.

Sure you will. Make sure that God isn't part of the process for those Christians.

God is no more a part of it for evolution than he is for gravity.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Ah, an evolutionist trick. I notice that the graph doesn't specify what question was asked. Do you expect me to take your word? Trust has to be earned, and evolutionists run low.

No trick. Here is the article it came from:

Evolution Less Accepted in U.S. Than Other Western Countries, Study Finds

And evolutionists have much higher honor than any creationist. Look at your uber-creationist Kent Hovind, jailed for not giving to Caesar that which is Caesar's.

Ask questions nicely and you will get polite answers. Be rude and rudeness comes back to you.

And if you want evidence first you have to be able to show that you understand what scientific evidence is.

The theory of evolution does not "disprove God" It only disproves Genesis.

 

[crazyforgod1212]

What is embarrassing about that graph is that the only country more backwards than the U.S. is Turkey.

It gives me very very little pride to say "Well, at least we beat Turkey".

We're not falling for your tricks, deceiver.

 

[crazyforgod1212]

No trick. Here is the article it came from:

Evolution Less Accepted in U.S. Than Other Western Countries, Study Finds

And evolutionists have much higher honor than any creationist. Look at your uber-creationist Kent Hovind, jailed for not giving to Caesar that which is Caesar's.

Ask questions nicely and you will get polite answers. Be rude and rudeness comes back to you.

And if you want evidence first you have to be able to show that you understand what scientific evidence is.

The theory of evolution does not "disprove God" It only disproves Genesis.

Appeal to majority fallacy.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Appeal to majority fallacy.

Wrong.

You don't even know what the claim was.

Try again.

 

[justlookinla]

There are no creation theories taught in schools.

Of course there are. How were humans created, entirely by naturalistic processes according to atheistic creationist theory. And that's taught in schools.

It's not science.

What do you mean "godless evolution"?

Godless evolution is the creationist viewpoint promoted by the atheistic community to explain the creation of humanity only, totally, completely, solely by naturalistic mechanisms acting on a sing;e life form from long long ago.

All science is "godless".

Atheistic Darwinist creationism isn't science, it's a creationist worldview promoted by the atheist agenda and taught in schools as 'science'.

[QUTOE] Are you saying that no Christian believes in Godless Gravity? How about Godless Thermodynamics?[/QUOTE]

Common, but useless tactic. The focus will remain on how humanity exists today. Creationism.

Why do you have a bone to pick with evolution? Is it because it shows that your own version of God is wrong?

The bone to pick is with the false claim of atheistic creationism that humanity is the result of entirely, totally, completely, only naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago. That particular creationist view is entirely based on guesses and suppositions.

This time you took the label on yourself. I have yet to meet an honest creationist. Sooner or later they act very dishonest or accept evolution. Look at you, you are afraid to learn what evidence is.

How many empty claims are you going to make concerning this 'mountain of evidence' which has been, hereunto, invisible.?

Sorry, that would be you. I have offered more than once to supply the evidence you desire. You will not "pay" a very low price for it. I told you that it is not free.

Empty claim.

God is no more a part of it for evolution than he is for gravity.

That's not what Christians believe.

 

[crazyforgod1212]

And if you want evidence first you have to be able to show that you understand what scientific evidence is.

The theory of evolution does not "disprove God" It only disproves Genesis.

It tries to go against the word of God, which he put down in Genesis for man to see, plain as day in Genesis 1.

For years, atheists have been trying to impose their secular religion in schools, but when upstanding Christians push back, you act surprisd? Do you expect us to be timid in the face of tyranny?

 

[Kylie]

It tries to go against the word of God, which he put down in Genesis for man to see, plain as day in Genesis 1.

For years, atheists have been trying to impose their secular religion in schools, but when upstanding Christians push back, you act surprisd? Do you expect us to be timid in the face of tyranny?

Yeah, Christians are so persecuted in the USA. Stop it, ya mean old atheists!

 

[Subduction Zone]

Of course there are. How were humans created, entirely by naturalistic processes according to atheistic creationist theory. And that's taught in schools.

Humans weren't created. They evolved. The English language is a wonerful thing. Perhaps you should learn how to use it properly.

It's not science.

Quite right. Your beliefs are not science. The theory of evolution is a scientific theory. It was developed using the scientific method. There are many here that could help you learn.

Godless evolution is the creationist viewpoint promoted by the atheistic community to explain the creation of humanity only, totally, completely, solely by naturalistic mechanisms acting on a sing;e life form from long long ago.

No it is not. Try again.



Atheistic Darwinist creationism isn't science, it's a creationist worldview promoted by the atheist agenda and taught in schools as 'science'.

Common, but useless tactic. The focus will remain on how humanity exists today. Creationism.

No, I do not care for your superstitious beliefs. Thermodynamics and other sciences are just as "Godless" as evolution. Why don't you hate them?

The bone to pick is with the false claim of atheistic creationism that humanity is the result of entirely, totally, completely, only naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago. That particular creationist view is entirely based on guesses and suppositions.

You are so afraid that you cannot even use proper English.

How many empty claims are you going to make concerning this 'mountain of evidence' which has been, hereunto, invisible.?

You know what you have to do to see the evidence. You aren't fooling anyone. I have offered to show it to you often enough.

Why are you so afraid.

That's not what Christians believe.

You do not know what Christians believe, and that is rather sad.

 

[Subduction Zone]

It tries to go against the word of God, which he put down in Genesis for man to see, plain as day in Genesis 1.

For years, atheists have been trying to impose their secular religion in schools, but when upstanding Christians push back, you act surprisd? Do you expect us to be timid in the face of tyranny?

No it doesn't. It only goes against Genesis. That is not the word of God. Not even the Bible says that.

And if you don't like evolution science is an incredibly level playing field. Show the objective, scientific evidence for your claims and you can earn a part in the process.

 

[crazyforgod1212]

No it doesn't. It only goes against Genesis. That is not the word of God. Not even the Bible says that.

And if you don't like evolution science is an incredibly level playing field. Show the objective, scientific evidence for your claims and you can earn a part in the process.

You forget the burden of proof. The onus is on you to support Darwin's crackpot hypothesis.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You forget the burden of proof. The onus is on you to support Darwin's crackpot hypothesis.

And it is supported by evidence. Why do you think that it is illegal to teach creationism in schools and yet evolution is perfectly legal? Do you think that could be done without massive evidence supporting our claims?

 

[USincognito]

You forget the burden of proof. The onus is on you to support Darwin's crackpot hypothesis.

If you do a search for evolution on Google Scholar, you get 4.4 million hits. I guess Creationists think those papers are full of nothing but question marks and blank space, but they'd be wrong.
evolution - Google Scholar

 

[EternalDragon]

And it is supported by evidence. Why do you think that it is illegal to teach creationism in schools and yet evolution is perfectly legal? Do you think that could be done without massive evidence supporting our claims?

It has more to do with equating creation or ID theory with a religion or the false idea of separation of church and state than anything to do with so called "evidence".

 

[EternalDragon]

If you do a search for evolution on Google Scholar, you get 4.4 million hits. I guess Creationists think those papers are full of nothing but question marks and blank space, but they'd be wrong.
evolution - Google Scholar

This again? I did a search the exact same way using the word "ID theory" and I got 2,400,000 hits. "Creation" yielded 3,100,000 hits.

Your smoke and mirrors won't work here.

 

[Subduction Zone]

It has more to do with equating creation or ID theory with a religion or the false idea of separation of church and state than anything to do with so called "evidence".

There is no "false idea" of separation of chuch and state, it is very very real.

And ID has been shown to be creationism in a cheap suit. Do you need to see the evidence that was turned up in the Dover trial again?

We all know that you know better.

Science is a very open process. If you have a valid claim it will be accepted. If you present foolishness you will be laughed at. So far creationists have only presented foolishness.

 

[Subduction Zone]

This again? I did a search the exact same way using the word "ID theory" and I got 2,400,000 hits. "Creation" yielded 3,100,000 hits.

Your smoke and mirrors won't work here.

That may be. Going on just he number of hits is rather meaningless, since Google is sometimes not the best of sorters. But if you had looked at the actual articles you would have seen that very few of the I.D. articles supported Intelligent Design and that the vast majority of the evolution articles supported evolution.

 

[justlookinla]

There is no "false idea" of separation of chuch and state, it is very very real.

And ID has been shown to be creationism in a cheap suit. Do you need to see the evidence that was turned up in the Dover trial again?

The teaching that all life is completely, solely, totally the result of naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago has been exposed as nothing more than atheistic creationism wrapped in the guesses and suppositions of pseudo-science.

We all know that you know better.

Science is a very open process. If you have a valid claim it will be accepted. If you present foolishness you will be laughed at. So far creationists have only presented foolishness.

Atheistic creationism isn't only foolish, it's a foolish faith-based belief system.

 

[justlookinla]

Humans weren't created. They evolved. The English language is a wonerful thing. Perhaps you should learn how to use it properly.

Of course they were created by entirely naturalistic mechanisms according to atheistic creationism.

Quite right. Your beliefs are not science. The theory of evolution is a scientific theory. It was developed using the scientific method. There are many here that could help you learn.

Creationist guesses and suppositions of atheistic Darwinist creationism isn't science either. It's a philosophical worldview concerning humanity.

No, I do not care for your superstitious beliefs. Thermodynamics and other sciences are just as "Godless" as evolution. Why don't you hate them?

I do not care for your Godless beliefs wrapped in the pseudo-science of atheistic creation.

You are so afraid that you cannot even use proper English.

You don't like the fact that atheistic creationism has been exposed, do you?

You know what you have to do to see the evidence. You aren't fooling anyone. I have offered to show it to you often enough.

And yet another baseless claim.

Why are you so afraid.

Why are you so evasive concerning this 'mountains of evidence' you claim you have?






You do not know what Christians believe, and that is rather sad.[/QUOTE]

 

[USincognito]

This again? I did a search the exact same way using the word "ID theory" and I got 2,400,000 hits. "Creation" yielded 3,100,000 hits.

Creation is a verb that applies to many things. Of the first 10 hits for Creation, precisely zero apply to Creationism.

How many hits does Creationism actually get?
creationism - Google Scholar
33,000.
Sad Trombone Sound Effect - YouTube