Why Is Darwinism So Dangerous? (5)

[EternalDragon]

Then you are calling all of the people who are afraid to learn what scientific evidence is an unbeliever.

Hey, didn't you run away from that class too?

Did you just call yourself an unbeliever?

Sorry but you are the only one that is calling them afraid. Several times in fact. I never uttered those words in any post.

More misdirection.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Sorry but you are the only one that is calling them afraid. Several times in fact. I never uttered those words in any post.

More misdirection.

Wrong, I have demonstrated that they are afraid and have drawn attention to that fact.

You have accused them of being unbelievers since you said that only unbelievers were afraid. And for once you had a valid point. That explains why they are so afraid to learn what evidence is.

Seriously, what other excuse would there be for them to not learn what evidence is? They would get the evidence that they asked for. It is not difficult. It is within their mental ability.

Why are they afraid?

 

[EternalDragon]

Wrong, I have demonstrated that they are afraid and have drawn attention to that fact.

You have accused them of being unbelievers since you said that only unbelievers were afraid. And for once you had a valid point. That explains why they are so afraid to learn what evidence is.

Seriously, what other excuse would there be for them to not learn what evidence is? They would get the evidence that they asked for. It is not difficult. It is within their mental ability.

Why are they afraid?

There is no possible way you could detect emotion through a typed forum post unless they expressly stated it, which they did not.

Please stop making things up.

 

[Subduction Zone]

There is no possible way you could detect emotion through a typed forum post unless they expressly stated it, which they did not.

Please stop making things up.

Wrong, when someone runs away from an offer of help, even after demanding something that could only be given if they took the offer of help it is obvious that the person is afraid.

Why else do various creationists run away?

 

[PsychoSarah]

Well, you're not giving scripture where God breathed a living soul into anyone but humans and there's a reason for that. God only breathed a living soul into humans.

You haven't even given any scripture with the term soul in it, it says breath of life in Genesis, not breathed in soul.

 

[EternalDragon]

Wrong, when someone runs away from an offer of help, even after demanding something that could only be given if they took the offer of help it is obvious that the person is afraid.

Why else do various creationists run away?

I have no idea what you are on about. And I don't care to know.

 

[Kylie]

I have no idea what you are on about. And I don't care to know.

Creationists demand evidence. To undersdtand the evidence provided, creationists would have to learn what evolution actually is. They say no, they don't want to understand, and therefore don't understand the evidence provided. Since they don't understand the evidence, they claim no evidence has been provided.

The problem is with the creationists who remain intentionally ignorant. Do you wish to remain intentionally ignorant?

 

[Atheos canadensis]

The teaching that all life is completely, solely, totally the result of naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago has been exposed as nothing more than atheistic creationism wrapped in the guesses and suppositions of pseudo-science.



Atheistic creationism isn't only foolish, it's a foolish faith-based belief system.

I am astonished that this "discussion" is still going on. You have insisted for pages that atheistic evolution is what is taught in schools, but you have never provided any evidence for this. When I was taught about evolution, at no point were we told to keep in mind that God didn't exist or wasn't involved. Know why? Because evolution is a scientific theory, not a metaphysical position. The fact that both Christians and atheists accept evolution proves that it is not inherently atheistic. So instead of countless more pages of this absurd tail chasing, could you just post the evidence that supports your contention that schools teach ?atheist evolution"?

 

[biggles53]

I am astonished that this "discussion" is still going on. You have insisted for pages that atheistic evolution is what is taught in schools, but you have never provided any evidence for this. When I was taught about evolution, at no point were we told to keep in mind that God didn't exist or wasn't involved. Know why? Because evolution is a scientific theory, not a metaphysical position. The fact that both Christians and atheists accept evolution proves that it is not inherently atheistic. So instead of countless more pages of this absurd tail chasing, could you just post the evidence that supports your contention that schools teach ?atheist evolution"?

He's not interested in discussion, nor in constructive argument.....he's just a useless troll. It's why I no longer give him any oxygen whatsoever.....

 

[DogmaHunter]

I am astonished that this "discussion" is still going on. You have insisted for pages that atheistic evolution is what is taught in schools, but you have never provided any evidence for this. When I was taught about evolution, at no point were we told to keep in mind that God didn't exist or wasn't involved. Know why? Because evolution is a scientific theory, not a metaphysical position. The fact that both Christians and atheists accept evolution proves that it is not inherently atheistic. So instead of countless more pages of this absurd tail chasing, could you just post the evidence that supports your contention that schools teach ?atheist evolution"?

Lol... Good luck with that :-D

 

[DerelictJunction]

I'm not surprised you aren't going to explain how humanity is the result of entirely naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago. If you had responded, it would only be with a series of guesses and suppositions which of course would be meaningless.

Nor am I surprised. After considerable interaction with you, most posters here realize that a substantive reply will result in one or more of the following reactions from you.
1. Denial rather than rebuttal
2. Repetition of "information" which was shown to be incorrect long ago.
3. Definitions so exceedingly distorted that they resemble outright lies.
4. Made up oxymoronic terms not found in the literature of either side in this discussion.

Strangely, you probably wonder why we don't treat you with the respect you deserve, when, in fact, we are.

 

[justlookinla]

Wrong, I have demonstrated that they are afraid and have drawn attention to that fact.

You have aptly demonstrated you have shovelfuls of no evidence. That's because there's no evidence and it exists only in your imagination.

 

[DerelictJunction]

You know, it's humorous to watch your 'yer a liar' response when you can't address the issues. You do that a lot, you know.

This is a distorted description of what he actually did.

Of course there's such a thing as atheistic creationism. How do you think you were created from a single life form of long long ago?

Then point to an scientific or creationist article that uses the term. Otherwise we are well within reason to state that you made it up.

As long as the atheistic Darwinist creation model is presented, I'll keep responding.

Those terms don't go together. Darwinist creation cannot be atheistic because it requires the specific act of divine creation. I've told you that a number of times!!

 

[justlookinla]

Creationists demand evidence. To undersdtand the evidence provided, creationists would have to learn what evolution actually is. They say no, they don't want to understand, and therefore don't understand the evidence provided. Since they don't understand the evidence, they claim no evidence has been provided.

The problem is with the creationists who remain intentionally ignorant. Do you wish to remain intentionally ignorant?

If a creationist makes a claim, there follows a demand for evidence. If someone makes the claim they have 'mountains of evidence', the request is made to provide the 'mountains of evidence'. The reaction from the person making the claim they have 'mountains of evidence' is to not offer this 'mountains of evidence' for various and sundry reasons.

Bottom line, the claimants 'mountain of evidence' apparently only exists in their fevered imagination and offers shovelful after shovelful of nothing.

That's the 'evidence' of atheistic Darwinist creationism that we see day after day after day.

 

[justlookinla]

I am astonished that this "discussion" is still going on. You have insisted for pages that atheistic evolution is what is taught in schools, but you have never provided any evidence for this. When I was taught about evolution, at no point were we told to keep in mind that God didn't exist or wasn't involved. Know why? Because evolution is a scientific theory, not a metaphysical position. The fact that both Christians and atheists accept evolution proves that it is not inherently atheistic. So instead of countless more pages of this absurd tail chasing, could you just post the evidence that supports your contention that schools teach ?atheist evolution"?

You were taught that all of creation was the result of only naturalist mechanisms weren't you?

 

[justlookinla]

You haven't even given any scripture with the term soul in it, it says breath of life in Genesis, not breathed in soul.

Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
​

1Co_15:45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.
​

 

[justlookinla]

He's not interested in discussion, nor in constructive argument.....he's just a useless troll. It's why I no longer give him any oxygen whatsoever.....

Nor do you give evidence for all of creation being the result of only naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago.

 

[RickG]

You have aptly demonstrated you have shovelfuls of no evidence. That's because there's no evidence and it exists only in your imagination.

lookinla, the evidence is constantly presented to you. The problem is you refuse to discuss any of it and then claim their is not evidence.

 

[justlookinla]

Nor am I surprised. After considerable interaction with you, most posters here realize that a substantive reply will result in one or more of the following reactions from you.
1. Denial rather than rebuttal
2. Repetition of "information" which was shown to be incorrect long ago.
3. Definitions so exceedingly distorted that they resemble outright lies.
4. Made up oxymoronic terms not found in the literature of either side in this discussion.

Strangely, you probably wonder why we don't treat you with the respect you deserve, when, in fact, we are.

Treat me however you wish. That's your decision.

Oh...and criticism of the atheistic creationist worldview isn't going away.

 

[justlookinla]

lookinla, the evidence is constantly presented to you. The problem is you refuse to discuss any of it and then claim their is not evidence.

Nope, nothing has been offered to support the atheistic creationist viewpoint.