Rdr Iakovos
Well-Known Member
It is so because you say it is so- fallacious reasoning there.A tradition with no foundation in Scripture.
Foundation: The basis upon which something is grounded
In point of fact, the celebration of the Advent and Nativity of Jesus the Christ has very firm foundations in scripture, most notably in the Lukan Gospel. The events as recorded there make it clear that His birth was anticipated and celebrated.
Luke 1:42
Luke 2:11-12
Luke 2:13-14
Luke 2:20
Luke 2:29-33
Such are the foundation of our celebration, awe and wonder. Dragging santa, gifts, trees and yule logs- regional customs- is a MASSIVE Strawman.
It is only when you say "Christ Mass is not commanded in scripture" that we can find common accord. It's true- it is not commanded in scripture. Elsewise, you are making false and unsubstantiated claims. Particularly when you attempt to connect the prohibitions against idolatry, as if they are a priori proved. They are not. You therefore you commit a fallacy of affirming the consequent.
Affirming the consequent - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Logical fallacy
This says nothing of the genetic fallacy that your entire argument here hinges on.
Careful when you start throwing about debate terms- you might have such a measure applied to your own (ahem) logic.
Now that's QED
Strawman. Christmas is not Jesus' birthday. It is a celebration of His AdventI first heard your glib answer when I was eight years old attending a Catholic Catechism Class. I remember asking myself, 'If it is baby Jesus' birthday, why do I get to party (celebrate) at Christmas?' That didn't make sense at eight, but I went along with it because who doesn't like toys, big dinners, and cake for dessert? As an adult, what does make sense to me is what the Bible says about bringing honor to God and what our gifts are.
Which is why those offering food to the hungry on this Christmas, or any other day, will be near to God. Likewise, wherever they are, if they do what they do unto God, then they are His servants and He is near. All things permissible, not all profitable. I assume that every other member of this royal priesthood can find for themselves without your help or berating what is profitable for them?John 12:26 "If anyone serves Me, he must follow Me; and where I am, there My servant will be also; if anyone serves Me, the Father will honor him.
Alrighty then.
Another logical fallacy. It is only necessary and Godly to reject the traditions of your family if such are in fact unGodly. You assume a priori once again.Eph. 2:8 - For By grace you have been saved through faith; and not of yourselves, it the gift of God.
Phil 1:29 - For to you it has been granted for Christ's sake, not only to believe in Him, but also to suffer for His sake,
granted -charizomai -(khra-id'-zom-ahee) - to give graciously, to bestow, a gift.
The gift of 'suffer for His sake' is a daily cross (Luke 9:23). How does one suffer for His sake? Ask hard questions about your families traditions. When you do that, they will want to separate from you (Luke 6:22) for calling out their traditions. When you have the strength do that, then you are honoring God.
Frankly, your appeal also has potential cult written all over it. Jesus' admonition for us to chose Him over families, etc, must be carefully considered. Elsewise, fallacy of hasty generalization.
Here, study these:
Fallacies
Logical Fallacies
Your arguments need help.
Upvote
0