Francis Drake
Returning adventurer.
- Apr 14, 2013
- 4,000
- 2,508
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- UK-Independence-Party
Absolutely agree, but was not questioning that at all.A king is their equivalent of a political leader. There was no Democracy at this point in history.
You said, "God did not circumvent the will of the people re who they wanted as a political leader then, and He does not change. He will not do so today either." To me that implied you thought they would choose who would be their king.
I think we are at cross purposes here.
Again I agree,the demand for a king was rebellion against God that he should not reign over them.The verses clearly show it was NOT Gods will for a king to be placed and yet because of the people’s will, God gave them their King..
I disagree here. There are plenty of instances where God raised up faithful leaders, and when the Lord's people cry out to him, he does just that. The book of judges is full of that.If God would not interfere with their will then, He will not interfere with mans will today..
Demanding a king threw a spanner in the works, but did not stop it altogether.
Yes God gave them a king, and it implies that Saul was the very best man for the job in Israel. But he was still deeply flawed.
Then the Lord fired Saul and gave them David. Unfortunately for Dave, Saul refused to let go etc etc.
That aside, the problem with kings is that it creates a family line.The result being that you can get a wonderful faithful king, followed by his appallingly unfaithful son. And because you've demanded a monarchy, other than assassination, you can't get rid of him.
But democracies are not monarchies, and are not limited to family lines. So just like in Judges,when the people cry out, God can still raise a deliverer.
Upvote
0