• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why I dislike Calvinism

Mountainmanbob

Goat Whisperer
Site Supporter
Sep 6, 2016
15,961
10,816
74
92040
✟1,118,913.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Calvinists can disagree all they want, but Paul's answer to the jailer's question proves this.

Acts 16:30 - He then brought them out and asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?”

Jesus explained it perfectly to Nicodemus.
a work of the Holy Spirit
just like the wind
you (we) have no control over it.

Even though attending non Calvinist churches for most of my life
some of the teachings fell short I thought
come give your life (alter call) just for example
then went to a Calvinist church -- exactly what I believed -- straight from the Bible.

My wife has read her Bible prox 14 times through
she also thinks Calvinist teaching closes to the Book.

M-Bob
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I said:
"Calvinists can disagree all they want, but Paul's answer to the jailer's question proves this.

Acts 16:30 - He then brought them out and asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?”"
Jesus explained it perfectly to Nicodemus.
a work of the Holy Spirit
just like the wind
The work of the Holy Spirit is this:
John 16:
8 When he comes, he will prove the world to be in the wrong about sin and righteousness and judgment:
9 about sin, because people do not believe in me;
10 about righteousness, because I am going to the Father, where you can see me no longer;
11 and about judgment, because the prince of this world now stands condemned.

There is nothing here about causing anyone to believe.

you (we) have no control over it.
Over what, exactly? Just as I pointed out in Paul's answer to the jailer's question, one MUST believe in order to be saved.

And there are no verses that teach or even hint that God chooses who will believe.

Even though attending non Calvinist churches for most of my life
some of the teachings fell short I thought
come give your life (alter call) just for example
I agree. And awful invitation. Totally unbiblical. Again, it's Paul's answer to the jailer that we must preach to the lost.

then went to a Calvinist church -- exactly what I believed -- straight from the Bible.
I disagree. No verses say that one is elected to salvation.
No verses say that man is unable to believe until he is regenerated.
No verses say that God chooses who will believe.
No verses say that God's election is unconditional.
No verses say that God's grace is irresistible. Acts 7:51 says the opposite.
No verses say that regeneration precedes faith or that regeneration causes faith.

My wife has read her Bible prox 14 times through
she also thinks Calvinist teaching closes to the Book.
I would also close the books written by Calvinists.

I have been reading through the NT monthly for at least 16+ years. I do not find Calvinism anywhere in it.

If there are verses that I've just claimed that don't exist, please share.
 
Upvote 0

Mountainmanbob

Goat Whisperer
Site Supporter
Sep 6, 2016
15,961
10,816
74
92040
✟1,118,913.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
God made one vessel for honor and one for dishonor.
Romans 9:21 Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?

Some for special purpose
some for common use.
2 Tim 2:20

Man seems to had nothing to do with it?

M-Bob
How does any of this answer my points?

However, the same words are in Rom 9:21 and 2 Tim 2:20, and it should be obvious from the context of 2 Tim 2:20 that there are no "dishonorable" vessels in a house.

There are vessels for special use and vessels for common use.

iow, God creates some people with special talents, etc, and others with just common talents.
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Seems the majority of the United States forefathers were Calvinist? Were men not as smart back then? I think not.
M-Bob
How about just responding to my points? What the majority think is not relevant.

What the Bible says is totally relevant.

These are my points. Can any of them be refuted with clearly worded Scripture?

No verses say that one is elected to salvation.
No verses say that man is unable to believe until he is regenerated.
No verses say that God chooses who will believe.
No verses say that God's election is unconditional.
No verses say that God's grace is irresistible. Acts 7:51 says the opposite.
No verses say that regeneration precedes faith or that regeneration causes faith.
 
Upvote 0

MDC

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2017
1,127
511
50
Texas
✟74,701.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
How does any of this answer my points?

However, the same words are in Rom 9:21 and 2 Tim 2:20, and it should be obvious from the context of 2 Tim 2:20 that there are no "dishonorable" vessels in a house.

There are vessels for special use and vessels for common use.

iow, God creates some people with special talents, etc, and others with just common talents.
The vessel created unto dishonor is the vessel of wrath fitted to destruction.. Romans 9:22. [Staff edit].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,188
2,677
62
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟107,834.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
We have in God's Word Romans 10:13
For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Now that clearly says "whosoever shall". Undeniable, irrefutable, it is there for all to see.
Now if that were not true, God would not have kept His Word. We humans tend to speak in generalities. Someone says, "I will be there at 8". But we know they really mean they will be there around 8. Could be 8:30. This is not true of God. If He says something it must be true. You can't play around with God's Word and say, "Well He really didn't mean that". He meant what He said.
You say I have been shown many times, but I have also shown at least twice that the word "foreknowledge in Acts 2:23 versus Romans 8:29 and 1 Peter 1:2 is not the same Greek Word. You just make assumption that it is and ignore what I have told you.


Okay, are you including the "whosoever will" as those who under conviction by the Holy Spirit? Because not all are.

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,188
2,677
62
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟107,834.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You say I have been shown many times, but I have also shown at least twice that the word "foreknowledge in Acts 2:23 versus Romans 8:29 and 1 Peter 1:2 is not the same Greek Word. You just make assumption that it is and ignore what I have told you.

Go back and read post #189.

In it, I said and showed:

"Acts 2:23, to whom is this verse speaking of?

The New Analytical Greek Lexicon, By Wesley J. Perschbacher, Hendrickson Publishing Company, Peabody, Mass., 1990, p. 345:

"foreknowledge", "prescience", "previous determination", "purpose" (cf. Acts 2:23)

Literal translation:

"this One by the before-determined counsel and "purpose" of God given up having taken by hands lawless, having crucified, you killed,"

Purpose is a valid translation for "prognosei" in Acts 2"23. God's "purpose" was seen in His plan for mankind.

Acts 2:23, 1 Pet. 1:2, all are Strongs #4268."

In both usages, the word in Acts 2:23, and 1 Pet. 1:2 are given as the same according to:

"The New Analytical Greek Lexicon, By Wesley J. Perschbacher, Hendrickson Publishing Company, Peabody, Mass., 1990, p. 345"

On the other hand, I also said:

"Rom.8:29 is Strongs #4267 meaning:

"to appoint as the subjects of future privileges," Rom. 8:29; 11:2

Ibid. "proginosko" (Strongs #4267)"

It also comes from the same source, same page:

"The New Analytical Greek Lexicon, By Wesley J. Perschbacher, Hendrickson Publishing Company, Peabody, Mass., 1990, p. 345"

It is you who will not listen. I cited my sources, you did not.

And, I also cited The Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, which backs everything I said up.

"According to the dictionary (Kittel's), K. L. Schmidt comments:

"This comparatively rare and late word is used in the Greek Bible only six times in the NT in the sense "to foreordain" "to predestinate." Since God is eternal and has ordained everything before time, proopizein is a stronger form of opizein (to set bounds to). The synonyms and textual history show that the reference in proginwskien is the same. Rom. 8:29; ouv proginw kai prowpisen summorfouv tnv eikonov tou niou autou, Rom. 8:30; ous...prowpisen (A: proegnw) toutov kai ekalesen. The omniscient God has determined everything in advance, both persons and things in salvation history, with Jesus Christ as the goal. When Herod and Pilate work together with the Gentiles and the mob against Christ, it may be said: "h boulh [sou] prowrisen genesqai, Acts 4:28. Herein lies the hidden wisdom of God in a mystery, "hn prowrisen o qeoV pro twn aiwnwn eiV doxan hmwn," 1 Cor. 2:7, cf. IV, 819. The goal of our predestination is divine sonship through Jesus Christ: "proorisaV hmaV eiV uioqesian dia ihsou cristou ," Eph. 1:5. That we have our inheritance in Christ rests in the fact that we are proopisqentev kata proqesin tou ta panta energountov, Eph. 1:11.

Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, Edited by: Gerhard Kittel, Translated by: Geoffery W. Bromiley, Vol. V, "proopizw", p. 456, K. L. Schmidt.

You see: "to know beforehand that is foresee: - foreknow (ordain) know (before). And go with that.

But, "predestinate" is never used in the New Testament in this sense. And it is never used in the sense that God had intimate knowledge of said persons in the sense you mean.

Foreknowledge, lets also refer to Rudolf Bultmann's work in this area:

"In the NT, "proginwskein" is referred to God. His foreknowledge, however, is an election or foreordination of His people (Rom. 8:29; 11:2) or Christ (1 Pet. 1:20) (> ginwskw, 698, 706). In Pastor Hermae, mandata, 4, 3, 4 it simply means God's foreknowledge (cf. prognwstv in 2 Cl. 9:9). On the basis of prophecy the word "proginwskein" can be used of believers in 2 Pet. 3:17, also as Pastor Hermae, similitudines, 7,5 > eklegw. Another possible meaning in Greek is that of knowing earlier, i.e., than the time speaking (cf. Demosthenes of Athens, 29, 58; Aristotle, Rhetorica, II, 21, p. 1394b, 11; Josephus, Bella Judiacum, 6,8). This is found in Acts 26:5, where the meaning is strengthened by the addition of "anwqen." In Justin God's "proginwskein" is His foreknowledge (Apol. I, 28, 2 etc.) and the "proegnwsmenoi" are believers (Apol. I, 45, 1 etc.). The polemic against determinism, however, shows that the OT view has been abandoned (Dial., 140, 4). As One who simply knows beforehand, God is called "prognwstv" in Apol., I, 44, 11 etc. as is also Christ in Dial., 35, 7; 82, 1. There is also reference to prophetic foreknowledge in Apol., I, 43, 1; 49, 6 etc. Tatian, of Syria, in Oratio ad Graecos, 19, 3, speaks of Apollo in the same terms, so that what we have here is the Greek understanding."

Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, Edited by: Gerhard Kittel, Translated by: Geoffery W. Bromiley, Vol. V, "prognwskein", p. 457, Rudolph Bultmann commenting."

Your points are rendered moot.

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,188
2,677
62
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟107,834.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Acts 2:23:

"2:23 Him 5126, being delivered 1560 by the determinate 3724 5772 counsel 1012 and 2532 foreknowledge 4268 of God 2316, ye have taken 2983 5631, and by 1223 wicked 459 hands 5495 have crucified 4362 5660 and slain 337 5627: "

1 Pet. 1:2:

"1:2 Elect 1588 according 2596 to the foreknowledge 4268 of God 2316 the Father 3962, through 1722 sanctification 38 of the Spirit 4151, unto 1519 obedience 5218 and 2532 sprinkling 4473 of the blood 129 of Jesus 2424 Christ 5547: Grace 5485 unto you 5213, and 2532 peace 1515, be multiplied 4129 5684."

Verses Rom. 8:29:

"8:29 For 3754 whom 3739 he did foreknow 4267 5656, he 4309 0 also 2532 did predestinate 4309 5656 [to be] conformed 4832 to the image 1504 of his 846 Son 5207, that 1519 he 846 might be 1511 5750 the firstborn 4416 among 1722 many 4183 brethren 80."

Now, what did I say?

Acts 2:23, 1 Pet. 1:2, all are Strongs #4268.

#4267 is:

DeaconDean said:
"to appoint as the subjects of future privileges," Rom. 8:29; 11:2

The New Analytical Greek Lexicon, By Wesley J. Perschbacher, Hendrickson Publishing Company, Peabody, Mass., 1990, p. 345

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
The vessel created unto dishonor is the vessel of wrath fitted to destruction.. Romans 9:22.
Have you researched the Greek word for "fitted to"? It's 'katartizo'. It was used several times in the gospels for the disciples mending their nets. It's used in an ethical sense in Gal 6:1 and 1 Peter 5:10 translated "restore".

[Staff edit].

How about refuting from Scripture these points I've made:
No verses say that one is elected to salvation.
No verses say that man is unable to believe until he is regenerated.
No verses say that God chooses who will believe.
No verses say that God's election is unconditional.
No verses say that God's grace is irresistible. Acts 7:51 says the opposite.
No verses say that regeneration precedes faith or that regeneration causes faith.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Doug Melven

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
3,080
2,585
61
Wyoming
✟90,808.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Okay, are you including the "whosoever will" as those who under conviction by the Holy Spirit? Because not all are.
Just the ones that are in the world. John 16:8-9 And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:
16:9 Of sin, because they believe not on me;

"Acts 2:23, to whom is this verse speaking of?
I am curious why you keep bringing up Acts 2:23?
Of course God planned beforehand that Jesus would die. He was slain before the foundation of the world.
But, this is clearly not the same as predetermining who gets elected to salvation.
God doesn't choose some to go to hell. That would be against His will.
He said He wants all to be saved. 1 Timothy 2:4
Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
The LORD .... is not willing that any should perish.

Jacob have I loved, Esau have I hated.
Jacob, a picture of a man who lives by faith.
Esau, a picture of a man who lives in the flesh.

Vessels of wrath fitted to destruction
God knows in advance who will reject Him.

In my opinion I just think Calvinists don't think God was able to figure out who could be saved, how one person getting saved would influence others and that would influence others and so on.
To many permutations. So God had to take a hand in determining who gets saved.
I just think God is wise enough to figure all this out.
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
ToBeLoved said:
Couldn’t have been anything about the lives they lived and their relationship to God, huh?
Romans 9:11 refutes that
Please explain how so. Because that verse doesn't even define what election is for.
 
Upvote 0

Mountainmanbob

Goat Whisperer
Site Supporter
Sep 6, 2016
15,961
10,816
74
92040
✟1,118,913.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Couldn’t have been anything about the lives they lived and their relationship to God, huh?

I have heard that's faulty teaching thinking that God looks down the tunnel of time.

I will look that up and post it when I have more time.

M-Bob
 
Upvote 0

Doug Melven

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
3,080
2,585
61
Wyoming
✟90,808.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I have heard that's faulty teaching thinking that God looks down the tunnel of time.
I don't think God needs to look through a tunnel.
Isaiah 46:10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:

Revelation 21:6 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:

Revelation 22:13 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,818
✟368,235.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
WHy is it that both Arminians and Calvinists think there are only 2 theological positions? I'm neither, whether you are capable of comprehending that or not.
This is so true. I'm neither and almost every Calvinist has called me an Arminian.

Thanks for restating this. Maybe if they read it more than once it'll stick. The 'Arminian' is not the 'other' bucket for everyone not a Calvinist.
 
Upvote 0