• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why hijab?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Philothei

Love never fails
Nov 4, 2006
44,893
3,217
Northeast, USA
✟75,679.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8TF_u7mMu4&feature=related


Just wanted to know why women in Islam wear it and also support it?:sorry:

This thread is about the hijab not the Christian women's covering in the church...
Just to make it clear right off...:preach:

Are islam women given a choice? ARe those who do not wear it any less "muslim" than the other who wear it? Are they not considered mulsims? :confused:
 

Rhamiel

Member of the Round Table
Nov 11, 2006
41,182
9,432
ohio
✟256,121.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
When I was in Morocco, some women chose to wear a hijab some women did not, the ones who did not wear the hijab were not seen as any less Muslim. A group of friends would have some who did and some who did not, there did not seem to be a seperation of the two groups
 
Upvote 0

MK11

Regular Member
Aug 29, 2006
337
1
39
Visit site
✟22,993.00
Faith
Muslim
Just wanted to know why women in Islam wear it and also support it?:sorry:

Because they know that they are dignified and that their body is not a show to all people other than their husbands. That's why Eastern societies are much more conservative than Western ones, since women's body is not that cheap to be seen by all people and tempt men, who will then go and tempt women and the fornication begins. Islam didn't say adultery is forbidden and fullstop, as the case with your Christianity ( and not only a fullstop, but opening its doors as cancelling adultery punishment, preventing divorce and polygamy), but created solutions to limit it as much as possible as hijab for women, segregation between the two genders, preventing men to touch women even for shaking hands, this is because this desire is so tempting and it could happen that fornication occurs from a very small action as fire could occur from a very small spark. And I see this as a clear limitation in modern (not early) Christianity and that's why we find fornication is so notorious in Western countries, even among priests in also a very notorious way, because all doors leading to it are opened and a man fornicates or practices homosexuality no law blames him, while when a man marries another wife this is illegal and there may be a disciplinary action against him. Twisted logic.

Btw, what do you think a Christian girl could wear on the beach, are there any limit for her? And how could a priest baptize a Christian girl?

This thread is about the hijab not the Christian women's covering in the church...
Just to make it clear right off...:preach:

It's not just a matter of Christian women's covering in the church, it's the whole early tradition,even Tertullian made a book specially for that issue, and said in its introduction:

Having already undergone the trouble peculiar to my opinion, I will show in Latin also that it behoves our virgins to be veiled from the time that they have passed the turning-point of their age: that this observance is exacted by truth, on which no one can impose prescription—no space of times, no influence of persons, no privilege of regions. For these, for the most part, are the sources whence, from some ignorance or simplicity, custom finds its beginning; and then it is successionally confirmed into an usage, and thus is maintained in opposition to truth.
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf04.iii.iv.i.html

See also the didascalia apostolorum, which is supposed to be a reliable source for the Orthodox:
Thou therefore that art a Christian, (p. 9) do not imitate such women; but if thou wouldst be a faithful woman, please thy husband only. And when thou walkest in the street, cover thy head with thy robe, that by reason of thy veil thy great beauty may be hidden. And adorn not thy natural face; but walk with downcast looks, being veiled.

http://www.bombaxo.com/didascalia.html


Are islam women given a choice? ARe those who do not wear it any less "muslim" than the other who wear it? Are they not considered mulsims? :confused:

Of course, not wearing the hijab is a sin, but that doesn't infidelize her. Even adultery doesn't. If she died with that sin without repentence, she will be under God's will, either He will forgive her or she will go to Hell temporarily till she is cleaned from her sins, then she will enter Heaven. This is the case with any sin not unveiling only.
 
Upvote 0

Philothei

Love never fails
Nov 4, 2006
44,893
3,217
Northeast, USA
✟75,679.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Originally Posted by Philothei
This thread is about the hijab not the Christian women's covering in the church...
Just to make it clear right off...:preach:
It's not just a matter of Christian women's covering in the church, it's the whole early tradition,even Tertullian made a book specially for that issue, and said in its introduction:

Having already undergone the trouble peculiar to my opinion, I will show in Latin also that it behoves our virgins to be veiled from the time that they have passed the turning-point of their age: that this observance is exacted by truth, on which no one can impose prescription—no space of times, no influence of persons, no privilege of regions. For these, for the most part, are the sources whence, from some ignorance or simplicity, custom finds its beginning; and then it is successionally confirmed into an usage, and thus is maintained in opposition to truth.
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf04.iii.iv.i.html

See also the didascalia apostolorum, which is supposed to be a reliable source for the Orthodox:
Thou therefore that art a Christian, (p. 9) do not imitate such women; but if thou wouldst be a faithful woman, please thy husband only. And when thou walkest in the street, cover thy head with thy robe, that by reason of thy veil thy great beauty may be hidden. And adorn not thy natural face; but walk with downcast looks, being veiled.

http://www.bombaxo.com/didascalia.html

And .....I specified from the start this is not a thread for this ..... open a new one if you must. I prefer to remain silent on that matter... It is red herring anyhow.
 
Upvote 0

MK11

Regular Member
Aug 29, 2006
337
1
39
Visit site
✟22,993.00
Faith
Muslim
And .....I specified from the start this is not a thread for this ..... open a new one if you must. I prefer to remain silent on that matter... It is red herring anyhow.

Well, I see that there is no distinction between the two issues, since you Christians always act with double standards and attack Islam in what your own resources teach, then you retreat and accuse us of tu quoque and changing the subject, but anyway, I have no problem to do so, but I firstly ask you, do you have an answer to it, because if not I won't accept that I open a thread, no one answers it or participates in it, and it vanishes in an hour, so if you have a convincing answer to it which will refute my argument in the new thread, tell me and I will immediately open it, otherwise, I will keep on repeating that issue in this thread because in that case, you'll be committed to follow what it said, and your thread will have no point.
 
Upvote 0

Philothei

Love never fails
Nov 4, 2006
44,893
3,217
Northeast, USA
✟75,679.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Originally Posted by Philothei
Just wanted to know why women in Islam wear it and also support it?:sorry:

Because they know that they are dignified and that their body is not a show to all people other than their husbands. That's why Eastern societies are much more conservative than Western ones, since women's body is not that cheap to be seen by all people and tempt men, who will then go and tempt women and the fornication begins. Islam didn't say adultery is forbidden and fullstop, as the case with your Christianity ( and not only a fullstop, but opening its doors as cancelling adultery punishment, preventing divorce and polygamy), but created solutions to limit it as much as possible as hijab for women, segregation between the two genders, preventing men to touch women even for shaking hands, this is because this desire is so tempting and it could happen that fornication occurs from a very small action as fire could occur from a very small spark. And I see this as a clear limitation in modern (not early) Christianity and that's why we find fornication is so notorious in Western countries, even among priests in also a very notorious way, because all doors leading to it are opened and a man fornicates or practices homosexuality no law blames him, while when a man marries another wife this is illegal and there may be a disciplinary action against him. Twisted logic.

Btw, what do you think a Christian girl could wear on the beach, are there any limit for her? And how could a priest baptize a Christian girl?
It has nothing to do with the "society" as it is a hadith and 'rule" in your religion not any society in middle east commands women to wear hijab... so there your argument is weak.


Dignification has nothing to do with the hijab. You can wear shorts and hijab and still look imporper... pants also make a woman to look "improper" to some....

Fornication cannot take place if one is wearing a hijab? how can it guarantee that??? Women who cover actually are less recognisable and can "escape" the eye thus they can "sneak" more easily.... IMO... and what I heard... with a pair of glasses women pass for just about any woman... anonymous. So your very weapon "against" adultery or fornication can be proven to be a "tool" for the complete opposite...

So far it trully does not make any sense...

Of course, not wearing the hijab is a sin, but that doesn't infidelize her. Even adultery doesn't. If she died with that sin without repentence, she will be under God's will, either He will forgive her or she will go to Hell temporarily till she is cleaned from her sins, then she will enter Heaven. This is the case with any sin not unveiling only.

Thank you for your answer so it is a sin. Now you say that it would not make her an "infidell"....What then she just has to "repent" and start wearing it? So you kind of believe in a pergatory state? where you spend time repenting from sins?

I was just curious as to what is the fuss of hijab... I guess you do not think it is a big deal wearing it as the more "modern" muslims do...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Philothei

Love never fails
Nov 4, 2006
44,893
3,217
Northeast, USA
✟75,679.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Well, I see that there is no distinction between the two issues, since you Christians always act with double standards and attack Islam in what your own resources teach, then you retreat and accuse us of tu quoque and changing the subject, but anyway, I have no problem to do so, but I firstly ask you, do you have an answer to it, because if not I won't accept that I open a thread, no one answers it or participates in it, and it vanishes in an hour, so if you have a convincing answer to it which will refute my argument in the new thread, tell me and I will immediately open it, otherwise, I will keep on repeating that issue in this thread because in that case, you'll be committed to follow what it said, and your thread will have no point.
ah...I see this is another "twisting one's arm" technique... No thanks ..I will not have the red herring today...tomorrow maybe^_^^_^ You want a sample counter argument? I will defend it through my Bible and nowhere Christ said anything about hijab or women's dressing..... Only Paul talked about it for the Church... That is the sample... as it is off topic really.

Yeah quoque is a specialty around this forum too...Where did you see me applying Chritian standards? Did I mention anything about it? NO. You did in both of your paragraphs and I replied avoiding your traps... so that we can have an honest discussion.


You all get too paranoid thinking it will "compare" the two. I do not. Trying to get information while debating that information on its own right is what I am intersested in.. Compairing has no place.

also I would like to know how it ties with your theology (if you can defend it that way.....:thumbsup:) I would be obligated to you.
 
Upvote 0

MK11

Regular Member
Aug 29, 2006
337
1
39
Visit site
✟22,993.00
Faith
Muslim
It has nothing to do with the "society" as it is a hadith and 'rule" in your religion not any society in middle east commands women to wear hijab... so there your argument is weak.

Sorry, I couldn't get your point, I was talking about the case that your societies opened all the doors leading to adultery, and no objection among Christian leaders or people, you are one of them. The middle east is generally a Muslim society, so they wear hijab.

Dignification has nothing to do with the hijab. You can wear shorts and hijab and still look imporper... pants also make a woman to look "improper" to some....
ummm, you clearly have a misconception of what hijab is, it is not just covering woman's hair, it's covering all her body (there is a diversity among Muslim scholars concerning face, some say it must be covered, the other team says it's preferred to be covered but not mandatory), and there are many conditions for the right hijab as being loose, so wearing pants is not a hijab, also it shouldn't be self attractive as wearing bright colors for example, and here we go.

Fornication can take place hijab can guarantee that??? Women who cover actually are less recognisable and can "escape" the eye thus they can "sneak" more easily.... IMO... and what I heard... with a pair of glasses women pass for just about any woman... anonymous. So your very weapon "against" adultery or fornication can be proven to be a "tool" for the against opposite...
Well, what happens your society is totally against what you are saying, where rape , marriage betrayals, sex before marriage, taking boyfriends and girlfriends, priest scandals are so extensive. For example, when I look at threads like these, I thank God for Islam:
http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=5831129
http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=4313707

What then she just has to "repent" and start wearing it? So you kind of believe in a pergatory state? where you spend time repenting from sins?
Yes, she should repent and wear it. Repentence doesn't take time, it only needs loyalty to God, and it is something between her and God, she doesn't need to go to the Mosque, sit with a Sheikh and confess to him, as you do. Btw, you didn't answer my question about what a priest whould do when he baptizes a new Christian girl? And what is the limit for a Christian girl to wear at beach?

I was just curious as to what is the fuss of hijab... I guess you do not think it is a big deal wearing it as the more "modern" muslims do...
What do you mean by a big deal? That she won't be a Muslim for example? As I said, it's a sin.
 
Upvote 0

MK11

Regular Member
Aug 29, 2006
337
1
39
Visit site
✟22,993.00
Faith
Muslim
ah...I see this is another "twisting one's arm" technique... No thanks ..I will not have the red herring today...tomorrow maybe^_^^_^ You want a sample counter argument? I will defend it through my Bible and nowhere Christ said anything about hijab or women's dressing..... Only Paul talked about it for the Church... That is the sample... as it is off topic really.
Oh, did you begin to believe in sola scriptura? Are you sure you are an orthodox?

Yeah quoque is a specialty around this forum too...Where did you see me applying Chritian standards? Did I mention anything about it? NO. You did in both of your paragraphs and I replied avoiding your traps... so that we can have an honest discussion.
That way you'll never be honest, when you abstain from your sources to attack Islam, this is hypocrisy. Honesty is that both of us is frank about what he believes, what you are doing has nothing to do with honesty.

also I would like to know how it ties with your theology (if you can defend it that way.....:thumbsup:) I would be obligated to you.
I don't need your tradition tell me that women's veil was mandatory, but the case is that you are attacking your sources before you attack Islam.
 
Upvote 0

Philothei

Love never fails
Nov 4, 2006
44,893
3,217
Northeast, USA
✟75,679.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Sorry, I couldn't get your point, I was talking about the case that your societies opened all the doors leading to adultery, and no objection among Christian leaders or people, you are one of them. The middle east is generally a Muslim society, so they wear hijab.

I know that tells me nothing about the value of hijab.... it is in your laws and still "it does not protect" your women from the actual "evils" of "western society" still they are around... so no point here...

ummm, you clearly have a misconception of what hijab is, it is not just covering woman's hair, it's covering all her body (there is a diversity among Muslim scholars concerning face, some say it must be covered, the other team says it's preferred to be covered but not mandatory), and there are many conditions for the right hijab as being loose, so wearing pants is not a hijab, also it shouldn't be self attractive as wearing bright colors for example, and here we go.
The diversity is yours to point out.... I had no idea it is for all the body thanks for bringing it up... So if hijab is all over covering what is the purpose of it? in the case of women wearing it? How is this making women to feel free and equal members in society?
Well, what happens your society is totally against what you are saying, where rape , marriage betrayals, sex before marriage, taking boyfriends and girlfriends, priest scandals are so extensive. For example, when I look at threads like these, I thank God for Islam:
http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=5831129
http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=4313707
I do not see any connection to hijab here...sorry...


Yes, she should repent and wear it. Repentence doesn't take time, it only needs loyalty to God, and it is something between her and God, she doesn't need to go to the Mosque, sit with a Sheikh and confess to him, as you do. Btw, you didn't answer my question about what a priest whould do when he baptizes a new Christian girl? And what is the limit for a Christian girl to wear at beach?
So...a solo confession to God would do the trick... -
The rest is red herring and off topic.

What do you mean by a big deal? That she won't be a Muslim for example? As I said, it's a sin.
[/QUOTE]

A sin that does not have any value since she can confess it herself and she is free to go... legalism but not conscious effort to "correct" one self ... I get it.
 
Upvote 0

Philothei

Love never fails
Nov 4, 2006
44,893
3,217
Northeast, USA
✟75,679.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Oh, did you begin to believe in sola scriptura? Are you sure you are an orthodox?
This is not about me... but about Islam... Come to the Orthodox forum to ask if we are sola scriptura...hehehe....Last time I checked I was... what if I am not I do not have to accept the Bible?^_^


That way you'll never be honest, when you abstain from your sources to attack Islam, this is hypocrisy. Honesty is that both of us is frank about what he believes, what you are doing has nothing to do with honesty

"abstain from my sources"??? what do my sources have to do with Islam?

nothing...:D.


I don't need your tradition tell me that women's veil was mandatory, but the case is that you are attacking your sources before you attack Islam.
[/quote]

I am not attacking my sources you are doing red herring again avoiding discussion.
 
Upvote 0

MK11

Regular Member
Aug 29, 2006
337
1
39
Visit site
✟22,993.00
Faith
Muslim
I know that tells me nothing about the value of hijab.... it is in your laws and still "it does not protect" your women from the actual "evils" of "western society" still they are around... so no point here...
Really? You are talking as if men don't have any desire against women that they won't look at her or get tempted. And this is not the case of course. And what happens in your countries proves my point. Usually the case in our societies is that men even if not so religious look at veiled women much more modestly than those who are not completely veiled, and this is not only a matter of religion, but a moral matter also. They may look at an unveiled woman, or may even deceive her, but when it comes to a veiled woman, his view towards her is much more respectful. Of course I don't say that veil will only prevent adultery, but it apparently limits it, and it is not only appearance that means that she is good, but it's her actions and faith as well, both are important.

The diversity is yours to point out.... I had no idea it is for all the body thanks for bringing it up... So if hijab is all over covering what is the purpose of it? in the case of women wearing it? How is this making women to feel free and equal members in society?

All of what I am saying and you still didn't understand what is the purpose of Hijab? I think we are already discussing it.

Where did Muslims claim equality between the two genders? This is the absolute injustice, as it will mean that woman should do the hard works man does, for example, why don't women work as butchers or in mines or priests as men do? Why don't you forget about the ladies first rule? Isn't it supposed to be an equality? The case is that God recognizes that there is a distiction between the nature of men and women, and that's why the laws must be set according to that distinction.

I do not see any connection to hijab here...sorry...

Yes there is. All what is happening in your society is the ultimate result of opening the doors for adultery, one of these doors is unveiling women.

So...a solo confession to God would do the trick... -
There is no trick, this is something between her and God and He knows her intentions, we don't need a mediator between us and God.

A sin that does not have any value since she can confess it herself and she is free to go... legalism but not conscious effort to "correct" one self ... I get it.
What do you mean by her being free to go? I didn't say so, since Prophet (Peace be upon him) tells us that if you have the authority to change a wrong action by your hand, so do it, if not, so by your tongue, if not, then by your heart. So if a woman goes out unveiled, her father or her elder brother or her husband should prevent her, if they didn't the government should.

This is not about me... but about Islam... Come to the Orthodox forum to ask if we are sola scriptura...hehehe....Last time I checked I was... what if I am not I do not have to accept the Bible?^_^
Are you a sola scriptura? Well I have seen many Orthodox here as Montalban and Bushmaster who consider traditions as well as Copts in Egypt.
And even if you are, don't you believe that there is a HS which guides your church? Were was he when Tertullian and the writer of the didascalia told these unjust opinions?
 
Upvote 0

PassionFruit

I woke up like dis
May 18, 2007
3,755
313
In the valley of the wind
✟28,050.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Democrat
Really? You are talking as if men don't have any desire against women that they won't look at her or get tempted. And this is not the case of course. And what happens in your countries proves my point. Usually the case in our societies is that men even if not so religious look at veiled women much more modestly than those who are not completely veiled, and this is not only a matter of religion, but a moral matter also. They may look at an unveiled woman, or may even deceive her, but when it comes to a veiled woman, his view towards her is much more respectful. Of course I don't say that veil will only prevent adultery, but it apparently limits it, and it is not only appearance that means that she is good, but it's her actions and faith as well, both are important.

I think it's a common misconception to say that if a woman wears a hijab she is somehow protected from the temptation of men. Actually, (your flag icon tells me you're from Egypt) there are campaigns that are telling women they should wear the hijab so they won't be sexually harassed, however there have been reports out that in Egypt both veiled and non-veiled women are very likely to sexually harassed on the street.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7514567.stm
So why does sexual harrassment happen to women who aren't veiled?

I also heard (mostly Muslim men) say that the hijab is worn to protect modesty. But what about the spiritual reasons for women who choose to wear it for just those reasons?

Also, if a woman doesn't observe the hijab, but follows the pillers of Islam and is she an 'observant' Muslim? Because I've met Muslim women who don't wear the hijab.


And I wouldn't assume that men don't get tempted, but doesn't the man also have a responsibility to control his temptation? It seems to me that Islam makes it seems as though people can't control their lusts.

All of what I am saying and you still didn't understand what is the purpose of Hijab? I think we are already discussing it.

Where did Muslims claim equality between the two genders? This is the absolute injustice, as it will mean that woman should do the hard works man does, for example, why don't women work as butchers or in mines or priests as men do? Why don't you forget about the ladies first rule? Isn't it supposed to be an equality? The case is that God recognizes that there is a distiction between the nature of men and women, and that's why the laws must be set according to that distinction.

Well actually, women have been doing hard in the fields for centuries. And it is well known that women have worked as butchers and mines. At least here in the US women have done traditional "men's work." And women were often good at it, sometimes better than men. I don't think men and women are that different that we have to be treated differently.


Yes there is. All what is happening in your society is the ultimate result of opening the doors for adultery, one of these doors is unveiling women.

Adultry doesn't only happen in the West.
 
Upvote 0

Bombila

Veteran
Nov 28, 2006
3,474
445
✟28,256.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
So is the contention that men are so weak-willed that they cannot control their own bodies and minds, therefore women must be prevented from many activities they could otherwise do as easily or better than many men? Women in Islam, then, must be altogether superior to the men, since they are not so swayed by the uncovered faces of men, and are gracious enough to suffer discomfort and discrimination to protect the weak wills of men.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Philothei
Upvote 0

Secundulus

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2007
10,065
849
✟14,425.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Mostly, women in the Middle East wear the hijab because they will get beat if they don't.

Otherwise, why have all those manly men religious police that go around checking on what women wear and beating them with sticks and hoses when they don't meet Muhammed's standard.

??Maybe manly man means something different in the west??
 
  • Like
Reactions: Philothei
Upvote 0

Rhamiel

Member of the Round Table
Nov 11, 2006
41,182
9,432
ohio
✟256,121.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Mostly, women in the Middle East wear the hijab because they will get beat if they don't.
that is not fair, many women wear the hijab because they want to, it fits their view of modesty.
Although I have to disagree with the idea that the hijab protects women, there is a lot of rape over there
 
Upvote 0

Philothei

Love never fails
Nov 4, 2006
44,893
3,217
Northeast, USA
✟75,679.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
.
Really? You are talking as if men don't have any desire against women that they won't look at her or get tempted. And this is not the case of course. And what happens in your countries proves my point. Usually the case in our societies is that men even if not so religious look at veiled women much more modestly than those who are not completely veiled, and this is not only a matter of religion, but a moral matter also. They may look at an unveiled woman, or may even deceive her, but when it comes to a veiled woman, his view towards her is much more respectful. Of course I don't say that veil will only prevent adultery, but it apparently limits it, and it is not only appearance that means that she is good, but it's her actions and faith as well, both are important

1. veiling does not and has not 'lower" adultery or rape all these centuries why would it happen now? do not see that.
2. Women who are not veiled can be a modest... You do not need hijab to do that for a woman
3. Actions? you mean as far as who is more religious a woman with or without hijab? Your call to answer like I said I am asking for information here... If you believe that "appearance" is not important then why wear the hijab? or is it a "show" or piety? just a token?


All of what I am saying and you still didn't understand what is the purpose of Hijab? I think we are already discussing it.
? that was the purpose of this thread...
Where did Muslims claim equality between the two genders? This is the absolute injustice, as it will mean that woman should do the hard works man does, for example, why don't women work as butchers or in mines or priests as men do? Why don't you forget about the ladies first rule? Isn't it supposed to be an equality? The case is that God recognizes that there is a distiction between the nature of men and women, and that's why the laws must be set according to that distinction.
Your hadiths do not claim that women are "unequal" to men...where is that in your haddiths? Actually the opposite is stated...

Yes there is. All what is happening in your society is the ultimate result of opening the doors for adultery, one of these doors is unveiling women.
But if that problem of "adultery' was ONLY because the women are unveiled then you should not have any 'adultery' in your lands and.... unfortunately it still takes place...



There is no trick, this is something between her and God and He knows her intentions, we don't need a mediator between us and God.

What do you mean by her being free to go? I didn't say so, since Prophet (Peace be upon him) tells us that if you have the authority to change a wrong action by your hand, so do it, if not, so by your tongue, if not, then by your heart. So if a woman goes out unveiled, her father or her elder brother or her husband should prevent her, if they didn't the government should.

I am confused you said before that it a sin. she reconciles on her own no need for priest... just to go through this... fast.. Okay so far.. Then is she decides not to wear the veil any more ....Her free will is taken away ...she is a slave to men either her father or her husband and she "has" to even obey the governement to what she wears???? How incredible.... What happened to that she has a choice to wear it or not and God will judge her you stated before??? I can call you also on your post... So....that means you changed your tune now... How can a government decide what a woman wears and if she does not follow the sharia law she will be "forced" to wear something she does not agree with..... That is typical hypocricy to me in Islam....
Are you a sola scriptura? Well I have seen many Orthodox here as Montalban and Bushmaster who consider traditions as well as Copts in Egypt.

No, I am not sola scriptura but my beliefs have no weight on this anyhow...and ONLY distract our conversation...
And even if you are, don't you believe that there is a HS which guides your church? Were was he when Tertullian and the writer of the didascalia told these unjust opinions?
These opinions are opinions of Christians who lived in that era. I do trust the canon law and the Bible and the decisions of the councils... Our canon law is not like the haddiths you have. Since you know Montalban and Bushmaster I am positive they have already told you that already. We do not have a legal system like Mulsims do and they have to follow...

Or if that was the case you would have ALL EO women wearing head covering... and we do not.
 
Upvote 0

Bookofknowledge

Senior Veteran
Sep 8, 2004
4,913
29
✟27,821.00
Faith
Muslim
Just wanted to know why women in Islam wear it and also support it?

This thread is about the hijab not the Christian women's covering in the church...
Just to make it clear right off...

Are islam women given a choice? ARe those who do not wear it any less "muslim" than the other who wear it? Are they not considered mulsims?

The most important question is are we dictators? As a western civilization do we grant people the freedom and right to wear anything they seem modest and what was practiced by holy wifes of Prophets and teachings of a religion?
 
Upvote 0

MK11

Regular Member
Aug 29, 2006
337
1
39
Visit site
✟22,993.00
Faith
Muslim
I think it's a common misconception to say that if a woman wears a hijab she is somehow protected from the temptation of men. Actually, (your flag icon tells me you're from Egypt) there are campaigns that are telling women they should wear the hijab so they won't be sexually harassed, however there have been reports out that in Egypt both veiled and non-veiled women are very likely to sexually harassed on the street.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7514567.stm
So why does sexual harrassment happen to women who aren't veiled?

I didn't say it only occurs to unveiled women, but I say it reduces sexual harrasment, look for example at the one in the end telling that he saw a woman with a niqab, and said that she must be beautiful, or hiding something. This is a clear misconception of niqab and if Egyptian women were all veiled, it would have been obviously known that this is not the case.
And this may more be the case with men who has nothing to do as the article says, I understand that the problem is not only unveiling which is one of the reasons, but the case is more effective with people who have something to do in their life. Their desire can be an obstacle in many cases, and unveiled women stimulate this desire and I myself have seen this a lot with people so close to me, and it sometimes happens to me even.

Also, if a woman doesn't observe the hijab, but follows the pillers of Islam and is she an 'observant' Muslim? Because I've met Muslim women who don't wear the hijab.
Well, it is not taken in a lump that way, either she is observant or not. It's a sin, God will account her on it, as well as accounting her for her good deeds, and see the overwhelming portion, but of course, unveiling is not an easy sin.

And I wouldn't assume that men don't get tempted, but doesn't the man also have a responsibility to control his temptation? It seems to me that Islam makes it seems as though people can't control their lusts.
Yes, of course he has to, but when the surrounding environment doesn't help him, it may be much more difficult. And as the difficulty increases, his reward from God increases.

Well actually, women have been doing hard in the fields for centuries. And it is well known that women have worked as butchers and mines. At least here in the US women have done traditional "men's work." And women were often good at it, sometimes better than men. I don't think men and women are that different that we have to be treated differently.
Well, I see that this is a humilation to women who are supposed to be more sympatique, and their own nature is that their body is weak and have more emotions than men. I know there are types of women who serve in the army and in oilfields, but I think that these types you are talking about are not really women, they are females:D, for example how could they care for their children and their houseworks? Besides, the case is that this is not the general case, usually men are those who take leading positions, for example, most presidents and leaders are men, and most of those who work in the mines, oilfields and plants are men. What you are talking about is not the general case, and I really cannot imagine a man who marries a girl working as a butcher for example.

Adultry doesn't only happen in the West.
I didn't say so, but generally it is much more present in the West.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.