Actually it is condemning someone, regardless of how polite (or not) the language is.
What if somebody's actions were very bad?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Actually it is condemning someone, regardless of how polite (or not) the language is.
Here "vulgar" is in the eye of the beholder. Indeed, the word at its basis only means used by the general population.Making vulgar, guttural references to human sexuality, anatomical parts and biological functions.
Then you can call on them to repent. That is not condemning them.What if somebody's actions were very bad?
Then you can call on them to repent. That is not condemning them.
Its all in how you say it. Kinda like the rules here on ad-hominem attacks. You can say all kinds of bad things about their actions, but not them personally.What if you're talking about really bad people? Not insulting, but referring to them.
Its all in how you say it. Kinda like the rules here on ad-hominem attacks. You can say all kinds of bad things about their actions, but not them personally.
In general - yes.So if somebody says (celebrity name) is a disgusting person, is that wrong?
Here "vulgar" is in the eye of the beholder. Indeed, the word at its basis only means used by the general population.
The Bible translation known as the "Latin Vulgate" used Vulgar Latin - that which was in common street talk in the 3rd and 4th centuries. The King James translation was rejected for years by the proper Church of England clergy as being too "vulgar." (common street talk)
It is only in the 19th-20th centuries that "vulgar" became equated with obscene.
By making that statement, the author could even render clinical descriptions as vulgar.
On a forum I used to be on, one woman (baptist pastor's wife) about my age said the worst beating she got as a young child was when she asked her mom "What is a virgin?" Mom told dad. Dad beat her with a belt. After the beating he asked where she heard such a vulgar, dirty word. She answered: "Round yon virgin, mother and child..."
Currently, the most insulting way of adressing someone in japanese (kisama) can be literally translated as "precious sir".
There is a lesson somewhere in there.
Interesting. Thing is, one can be insulting just by tone of voice, or the way something's presented...your example must be similar, an ironic insult.
Personally, I hate it when anyone calls someone a [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse], cow, pig or anything like that, even casually without meaning much. I know someone who has a cat, and sometimes it'll make a mess on the floor. She'll say 'look at what the [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] has done'. So, I point out, rather pedantically, that she's a cat, not a female dog.
Having said that, there is a friend of my daughter's who quite often will say 'you [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]', but rather weirdly, I don't take offense at it, because I absolutely know she's not meaning it in any bad way at all. It is absolutely a word she's using in complete jest (though I'm sure she uses it sometimes with certain people, as an insult).
The reason, I think that I hate the use of those sorts of words againsy anyone is because it is demeaning, insulting and disrespectful.
Which brings me to another point. Profane presumably is something that's not sacred. Would you say, perhaps, that human beings are sacred to God? I don't know. But, if so, should one insult them in any way?
I differentiate between what might be called 'vulgar' language and what is 'swearing'. People often say to someone 'don't swear'. But to me, it's very often vulgar or inappropriate language, as opposed to swearing. Swearing, I always think (though I may be wrong) is when you say 'By...whatever....I'll...whatever. So if you are using words, or possibly even contractions, or words that have been changed from the original, such as 'blimey' or 'crikey' (which admittedly are rather old-fashioned now) which meant something like 'by Christ', I believe, I think this sort of thing, would be swearing. And not good.
But that's just the way I look at it.
The sin is in the offense. Intentionally using a word or phrase or term that you know is going to offend another person (or God), is where the "wrong" comes into play. We're supposed to remain sensitive to both our own conscience, and the consideration of those around us. Using profanity, especially on a frequent, casual basis, dulls and desensitizes us to what's appropriate and considerate. This is where you wind up with threads like this, where people have become so numb to the effects of cursing that they're oblivious to how it may affect other people.
Sorry, not quite understanding your question?
Making vulgar, guttural references to human sexuality, anatomical parts and biological functions.
God says cursing is wrong because it destroys the sacredness of the human body.
Profanity is just manmade words-syllables. Curse words are only considered "wrong" just because they are offensive, based on arbitrary society and cultural standards.
I am not trying to justify profanity use. I know it's wrong. But what exactly, from a biblical perspective, makes it wrong? I don't understand the exact, specific reasons why it's wrong.