Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Is that what you say when you are stumped? Can't you find a really intelligent animal and have him say Hi to all the other evolutionists out there? That's what is ridiculous.
Do you have trouble communicating? How did you come up with that kind of tripe?
They jokes on you sweetie. In the end you lose. God Bless you
Genesis/Creation. Deceiving others by refusing to tell us WHERE the creatures which they say are evolving, came from. They find it IMPOSSIBLE to believe anything but that they just appeared...from nothing.... Then, when they get to the 6th Grade, they tell them about abiogenesis or magical chemical generation.
Evolution appears to say that we are here and changing genetically. Big Deal. I suppose it helps deceive the very young until it's time to really indoctrinate them and tell them they are nothing but evolved Apes. First, dehumanize them when they are very young, and then tell them the rest of the made up false story.
Your stories are not evidence, try again.
(Scientific) theories aren't evidence. If you think they are then you're doing it wrong.
They are as much evidence as your "theories". In fact, they are better sources since you must find the agreement of Scripture, science and history, in order to refute my views. So far, no one has, but keep trying and let everyone else learn. I have confidence in those evolutionists who believe God's Truth.
No. Not assumptions either.
Yeah, you don't know how science works, do you?
But you are (once again) arguing about hypotheticals, because in reality, all these patterns match.
So what we would be looking at, is a creature which shares more ERVs with us than chimps do, but also shares LESS of the rest of their genome with us than chimps. In other words, the phylogeny created by ERVs would contradict the phylogeny of the rest of the genome. Evolution would not be able to explain this.
so a pc isnt evidence for design too?How hard was that to admit?
By the way, I may start employing one of creationsists' favourite tactics - quote mining. This little gem deserves to be shouted loud and proud every time you spout your nonsense.
so a watch isnt evidence for design. thanks.That is right.
If you find a watch, 'the designer dun it' is simply a proclamation.
Which designer? And how do you know? What about the multitude of other watch types - digital, for example? Was it the same designer? How would you know?
At the very best, if you find a watch on earth, you could conclude that a human made it.
Which human? And how would you know? And how did this human design and make the watch? Did this human make all the pieces him or herself? All the gears, springs, etc? Or were there other humans involved?
So you can (but likely won't) see that merely positing a Designer or Creator without providing any evidence for whom the designer was, how the designer operated, etc., is something a child might do?
If you can show me a case of something that evolution says is impossible, then I will consider it.
Of course it is. It is made out of plastics and other materials not found in nature, formed in ways which natural processes do not operated. It is obviously man-made so it must have been designed.so a pc isnt evidence for design too?
Mans' "common ancestor" is the dust of the ground.Of course it is. It is made out of plastics and other materials not found in nature, formed in ways which natural processes do not operated. It is obviously man-made so it must have been designed.
In and of itself, no, a pc is not evidence of design. But the use of manmade materials, evidence of manufacture etc ARE evidence of design.so a pc isnt evidence for design too?
Some seem to ignore and not hear your little facts as in this post.actually it can. we can say that the rest of the genome was less conserve and it got many mutations comparing to other animals. actually some genes in sharks are colser to human than to other fishes:
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2007/05/30/1937469.htm
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?