That is interesting, you use those 2 verses as a reason this person didn't hear from God.
This is what the
Bible says, not just what I say. Sin is the number one reason God does not respond to our attempts to relate with Him. We must be "holy as He is holy" to relate with Him personally and intimately.
Once again, blaming the person for the failure of God's appearance.
God is ready and waiting to relate with us -- but on His terms, not ours.
It's interesting that the bible has tons of examples of people who were in iniquity who God could still hear.
Oh, God is fully aware of what all of us, unrepentant sinners or not, do and say. The idea of God not hearing us has more to do with the nature of His response to our calls upon Him to act favorably on our behalf while we are living in rebellion to His will. When we are "sinning willfully", or living in sin as the norm of our behaviour, He will not bless us or answer our prayers positively, nor will He walk with us into the darkness of our sin.
Even Judas who supposedly betrayed Jesus talked to Jesus and Jesus talked back.
This is a different circumstance to the one the OP of this thread has described. Unlike the OP of this thread, Judas wasn't looking to connect with God; he was conspiring to betray Jesus.
Same with Peter who denied Jesus.
Did Peter grieve over his denial of Jesus? Yes, he did. This distinguishes him from the unrepentant person who expects a holy God to ignore his/her unholiness and just be friends.
Same with the woman caught in adultery.
Whose sin Christ told her she must abandon.
Same with Adam and Eve who caused the "sin" mess in the first place.
Whom God judged with pain, labor and death.
Same with their son Cain who murdered his own brother. God heard and talked directly with those people in "iniquity", so don't use special pleading as your MO.
As I've pointed out, the "hearing" God did in the instances you've cited isn't the kind of hearing I'm talking about. In every case, the sin of the people in question was the prime interest of God.
So, an all powerful God has a version of kryptonite named "sin"? I thought Jesus took care of the problem on the cross supposedly?
Sin isn't God's "kryptonite"; its ours. And yes, Jesus did provide a way for sinners to be made acceptable to God. But the effect of Christ's work on the cross is only applied to those who believe in it and trust in Christ as their Saviour and Lord.
I guess he didn't do as good a job as christians have confessed? I mean, what you are basically saying is that people BEFORE and DURING Jesus' time and death could talk to God and he would talk back regardless of how BAD they were, but for some reason after Jesus "paid the price", it somehow made it worse for people.
See my clarification above.
Is that how you define "good news", but making it even harder to talk to God?
We make it hard to relate with God. He has gone to great lengths to create a means by which we may live in loving peace with Him. He could've in holy, righteous anger destroyed all of mankind but, instead, He has shown us mercy, grace and love. If someone finds it hard to interact with God it is because they make it so.
Peace to you.