• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why Does the GOP Support Lifting Sanctions on Oligarch?

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The rebuke vote is purely political in my view.
How is lifting the sanctions on these Russian businesses economically advantageous to the US?
The explanation given was that the people involved with this particular part of the sanctions had indeed followed, complied with, the requirements set out by the sanctions.
 
Upvote 0

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,650
15,696
✟1,223,466.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The explanation given was that the people involved with this particular part of the sanctions had indeed followed, complied with, the requirements set out by the sanctions.
People aren't believing that the Russian oligarch is no longer an owner or has authority over his three companies. Why should the US believe them or him? He is still under sanctions.
What type of documentation is needed to prove that they have separated themselves from him? idk
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
My view is that this is why we have a State Department, and all the other agencies that deal with such matters. The idea that the Congress instead is going to micromanage such day-to-day decisions with a meat axe approach and do it from afar with people who have no real knowledge of the issue casting the decisive votes is ridiculous. Just a partisan political thing.
 
Upvote 0

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,650
15,696
✟1,223,466.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
My view is that this is why we have a State Department, and all the other agencies that deal with such matters. The idea that the Congress instead is going to micromanage such day-to-day decisions with a meat axe approach and do it from afar with people who have no real knowledge of the issue casting the decisive votes is ridiculous. Just a partisan political thing.
Wasn't it the Congress who put the sanctions on Russia in the first place?
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
But this isn't about removing the sanctions from Russia.

It concerns only one small segment of the bigger policy and it not simply a *Shall we keep the sanctions or shall we get rid of them?* proposition. It is about following-up, about administering the sanctions, and only in this case.
 
Upvote 0

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,650
15,696
✟1,223,466.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
But this isn't about removing the sanctions from Russia.

It concerns only one small segment of the bigger policy and it not simply a *Shall we keep the sanctions or shall we get rid of them?* proposition. It is about following-up, about administering the sanctions, and only in this case.
Yes, it's lifting the sanctions on three Russian companies that were owned and operated by a Russian oligarch with close ties to Putin. An oligarch that is still under personal sanctions.
 
Upvote 0