Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Because one should know what one is talking about WHERE one is talking about it...in this case in the core of the earth...not half way to the sky!Why would you need to go down 12 miles?
Mentioning a story that the moon was once molten is not good evidence...you kidding??Well, here we go. You simply dispute what I say, despite good evidence that I have provided with arm-waving.
Because one should know what one is talking about WHERE one is talking about it...in this case in the core of the earth...not half way to the sky!
Where do you think that lava is coming from?
Deep under the earth....how deep is the question.Where do you think that lava is coming from?
Deep under the earth....how deep is the question.
Does anyone else notice what they forgot to add to their CGI?
Good news! I'm not going to say "no stars".They're doing CGI in real time live photos? That's pretty impressive.
Please, please tell me you aren't going to say "no stars." If you are, here's an experiment for you:
Get a decent camera with a telephoto lens. Wait until there's half moon or so. Wait till it's high in the sky with some stars near it. Get a shot of the moon so that it is nicely exposed with no blown out areas, and not much detail in the shadow.
In the image look for the stars. Gone.
Well, here we go. You simply dispute what I say, despite good evidence that I have provided with arm-waving.
I provided my evidence, now it's your turn to provide yours. You said that God did it (paraphrased), but haven't yet given me any objective evidence that there is a God. If you can provide me with objective evicence that there is a God, then it'll be my turn to provide some evidence and I'll give you more evidence, e.g. that the moon has been molten in the past. Deal?
Good news! I'm not going to say "no stars".But ... Where is the moon in this alleged 2-week time lapse? The moon is missing.
Oh, well, at least they remembered to program in moving clouds this time.
A simple google will show they think it goes as deep as a few hundred miles or so e such if I recall. Beyond that, they depend on sound waves mostly I think.I was under the impression that you only had dogmatic beliefs, not questions.
The satellite is INSIDE the moon's orbit....not outside the moon's orbit. Therefore it is entirely possible to go 2 weeks and not see the moon especially since the image is focused on earth and not the solar system...not to mention other things such as the orbit of the satellite in perspective of the moon. May the Lord God help you in your understanding....Another mainstream "proof" (allegedly from Japan's space agency's "satellite" Himawari-8) that the Earth is spherical and rotating:
Does anyone else notice what they forgot to add to their CGI?
Who is "they"?they think
What is "it"?it goes as deep as a few hundred miles or so
So, we are supposed to depend on your "recall" as real evidence?they think it goes as deep as a few hundred miles or so e such if I recall.
"I think"....thanks for the scientific evidence.Beyond that, they depend on sound waves mostly I think.
Good news! I'm not going to say "no stars".But ... Where is the moon in this alleged 2-week time lapse? The moon is missing.
So you do not believe that the moon would ever be seen on the far side of the earth at all, within the view of the "satellite", in the period of two weeks?The satellite is INSIDE the moon's orbit....not outside the moon's orbit. Therefore it is entirely possible to go 2 weeks and not see the moon especially since the image is focused on earth and not the solar system...not to mention other things such as the orbit of the satellite in perspective of the moon.
Not a single glimpse of the moon, in two weeks, eh? Sorry, I don't buy it.No, it isn't. The image is pretty tight on the earth. The geosynchronous satellite is in an equatorial orbit. And the moon's orbit is inclined by 20 degrees or so from the equator. We should not expect the moon to come into the field of view any more often than a lunar eclipse.
Mentioning a story that the moon was once molten is not good evidence...you kidding??
Now get over this God thing as an excuse why you don't need to solidly substantiate what you claim here. You want us to take it simply by blind faith!!? Get a grip man.
I don't know why, but this thread reminds me of my Tilt-a-Whirl Challenge:
The Tilt-a-Whirl, a product of intelligent design, uses chaotic motion to perform its function.
Demonstrate how God could have done the same, but didn't.
SOURCE
Who is "they"?
What is "it"?
So, we are supposed to depend on your "recall" as real evidence?
"I think"....thanks for the scientific evidence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?