I believe it really does matter what the inspired authors have written and what was their original intention; there is no another meaning than this. Goal of interpretation is twofold: (1) to explain what the text meant to its original audience and in its original historical setting; and (2), to explain what the text means for today. Because the Bible is God's special revelation, we must handle it accordingly.
I quote J. H. Keathley
Its Interpretation
If you will note, in the outline used here,
interpretation has been placed on a level with
illumination under the heading "Understanding the Bible." This is because the illuminating work of the Spirit goes hand-in-hand with the interpretation of Scripture. Although illumination is assured for believers, it does not always guarantee accurate interpretation. And if the interpretation is wrong, so will be the understanding of the passage in question. Many people approach the Bible with a false mysticism. Their attitude is, "The Holy Spirit will show what this means." But then they proceed to butcher the text and come up with some off-the-wall idea that completely misses what the Spirit is saying based on solid principles of Bible study or exegesis. The word that comes to mind here is
abuse. In a chapter entitled, "Handling the Scriptures Accurately," Swindoll writes:
Ours is a day of abuse; sexual abuse, emotional abuse, verbal abuse. But what about
biblical abuse? By that I mean being deceived by the improper use of Scripture. Who of us has not witnessed someone twisting Scripture, forcing it to mean something it does not mean? Those who dont know better start believing it with all their heart, only to discover later on that both the interpretation and the application were fallacious ... perhaps dangerous to their spiritual health and growth.
It is because of this very problem that the Apostle Paul, in a section where he was warning Timothy against false teaching that can lead to the ruin of the hearers, said, "Be diligent to present yourself approved to God as a workman who does not need to be ashamed,
handling accurately the word of truth" (emphasis mine). Paul had in mind the important principle that we must correctly handle the Word of God in both its analysis (exegesis) and in its presentation (exposition) since Timothy was faced with the foolish interpretations of false teachers (as we often are). But the main emphasis is on the study and interpretation of the Word of God. What's involved here? Is this a matter of sincerity or of theology?
Now this has nothing to do with
sincerity. Many, perhaps most, people who mishandle the Word are very sincere. And it really has little to do with
theology. Some who have their theology fairly well in place can still mishandle Scripture. It also has nothing to do with
personality. There are gifted teachers dripping with charisma who can sway an audience and hold them in the palm of their hand, yet be guilty of mishandling Scripture. It certainly has nothing to do with
popularity. Famous, highly visible personalities in Christian circles who can draw large listening audiences can (and often
do) mishandle Scripture. So lets put to bed, once for all, the idea that if a person just "loves the Lord," he or she will be preserved from mishandling Scripture. No, even those of us who believe in the inerrancy of Scripture and affirm the importance of sound doctrine can be guilty of biblical abuse.
Christians need to learn the basics of sound Bible study. Sound Bible study is that which is based on the fundamental principles of interpretation that will protect the student from Scripture abuse and that will provide a check on his or her own wild imagination. The following lists several important principles that are basic to the interpretation of Scripture.
http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=698