I'm wondering if I detect a note of the passive/aggressive. I can't be certain though.
I'm talking about paradigms, understandings by which to do cognition, like the anthropological understanding, psychology, genetics, Darwinism. Video games I think are a waste of time when you could be studying old time music and nailing theory like Randy Newman has. Redeem the time.
Daniel C. Dennett wrote Intuition Pumps and other tools for thinking. He also wrote Darwin's Dangerous Idea, a classic. Also Consciousness Explained and Freedom Evolves.
The thing about Creationism versus science, the study of nature in the very quest to explain the account of biology, is falsifiability which Carl Popper identified in his seminal development in the philosophy of science.
Any hypothesis is vulnerable to falsification. The evidence needs to be compelling and conclusive. It needs to be empirical, objective, substantive. It is tested in rigorous experiment. Others can and will ruthlessly test one's conclusions to see if they are unsound. Only the good theories survive, to be taken tentatively as explanatory and operational, until and if, a better and tested theory later supplants it.
Creationism is bent only on claiming itself verified. The science is all bogus, spurious. They force their conclusions. They are certainly not honourably seeking to falsify their assumptions and suppositions.
Creationism is not science. It is antithetical to science and its criterion of falsifiability. Creationism is antithetical to science. It parades as science and fools and impresses the credulous, the uneducated or miseducated.
Creationism is apologetics. The implications for Genesis being mythology are historic, seismic. That renders Calvary meaningless, because there was no Adam and Eve, no Fall, no inherited sin nature to be redeemed from before an absolutist God. Hence the Christian life is puerile. Christianity is really the Jesus cult. Thank you, Saul of Tarsus.
The science of evolution is just that, bona fide science, subordinated to the criterion of falsifiability. Despite what you are told in your world, what is promulgated in that dogmatized scene, evolution by natural selection on (non)random mutation, horizontal and vertical gene transfer and sexual selection has only ever been verified, never falsified.
One can confidently aver that wherever life has been able to emerge on any other planet in this particular stupefyingly vast universe, out of ionic, dynamic chemical interaction becoming ever more complex and varied, until self replicators eventually arise, life will evolve and speciation will obtain by the same process of evolution by natural selection. Life is fecund, because chemistry is interactive.
I have heard that this is all so impersonal. I am warm blooded, capable of empathy, since I am a Homo sapiens individual, evolved to have that social orientation for survival.
God is redundant, superfluous.
I don't have a faith.