- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,819
- 52,558
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You mean like: IN THE BEGINNING, GOD ... ?It surprises me when I see two religionists agree on aspects of their religion.
You mean like: IN THE BEGINNING, GOD ... ?
Would it matter?Funny how everything beyond those first four words is up for debate among you guys.
I was only querying as to qualify what you meant by "open-minded".
Would it matter?
Would Davian still be surprised?
Don't scientists have knock-down-drag-outs called "peer review"?
You mean like: IN THE BEGINNING, GOD ... ?
Sure, as a methodology for reaching consensus.Would it matter?
Would Davian still be surprised?
Don't scientists have knock-down-drag-outs called "peer review"?
Yet there are Christian panetheists, and Christian atheists.
"Christian atheism is a theological position in which the belief in the God of Christianity is rejected or absent but the moral teachings of Jesus are followed."
Christian atheism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"The apostle Paul quotes a pantheist poem about Zeus in Acts 17:28, turning it into a panentheist statement about their "unknown God" when he quotes, "'In him we live and move and have our being' as some of your poets have said."
Panentheism is also a feature of some later Christian thought, particularly in mystical Orthodox Christianity, Catholic philosophy, and process theology. In order to avoid confusion with pantheism some panentheists now use the doublet "unitheism.""
Panentheism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
by being led by the flesh.=
How have religionists reached consensus, historically?
=
Then odds can take a hike.
That analysis can't be done between humans and bananas, since too little of their genomes align.ept such things without reservations.
i'll be honest.
this is out of my league, but i do have questions.
have you done your analysis between humans and, say, bananas?
To the extent the analysis could be done, you're wrong.i believe you will find the same correlation
You'll find a similar relationship between any two closely related species -- because the differences between them are the result of mutation.i also believe that you will find this relationship between any 2 arbitrarily chosen species.
What time? What complexity? What are you talking about?IOW, what you are measuring is complexity in regards to time.
All known species undergo evolution. Some of them don't change much to outward appearance. Why would that need any explanation? They're well adapted to their environment.how does your model explain species that do not undergo "evolution".
What about Hox genes requires explanation?how does your model explain HOX genes?
As far as I can tell, adaptation and transposons have precisely nothing to do with this situation. If you have some reason to think otherwise, present your reasoning.adaptation and transposons would explain your results, neither of which requires the "man from ape" scenario.
Yes, all of them are hoaxes.... cool story bro.
Paul, the Baptist. check out:
Gods Wrath Against Sinful Humanity
The universe is not a static world. This is the downfall of the TOE.
The speed of light is slowing down.
That analysis can't be done between humans and bananas, since too little of their genomes align.
. . . . .
I didn't discount the possibility of doing a genetic comparison of humans and bananas; I said the particular analysis in question was impossible.Don't be so quick to discount the possibility of analyzing similarity between humans and bananas!
Gene Cuisine: Human DNA similarities to chimps and bananas, what does it mean?
Fitness Is Strongly Influenced by Rare Mutations of Large Effect in a Microbial Mutation Accumulation ExperimentAfter ∼644 generations of mutation accumulation, MA lines had accumulated an average of 118 mutations, and we found that average fitness across all lines decayed linearly over time. Detailed analyses of the dynamics of fitness change in individual lines revealed that a large fraction of the total decay in fitness (42.3%) was attributable to the fixation of rare, highly deleterious mutations (comprising only 0.5% of fixed mutations).
sfs,
how do you explain the following:
Fitness Is Strongly Influenced by Rare Mutations of Large Effect in a Microbial Mutation Accumulation Experiment
yes, it was aimed at a specific person.I know this is aimed at a specific person, but I still feel the need to answer. Life is trial and error, most of the time, it fails. Think of all the sperm which never go to become half of the genetic code of a person. It doesn't matter, because enough remain who are capable of surviving and reproducing to offset the huge degree of failure.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?