Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You always think that evolution is just evolution and not a process in creation. It is not evolution = no God or no God = evolution.
My husband never laughed at Christians he just shook his head from side to side, he felt genuinely sorry for anyone religious, how do you feel about Muslims? do you laugh at them or feel sorry for them?
Where have I laughed at Christians for their faith?How does your wife feel about you and your children laughing at Christians for their faith? I am sincerely asking, not judging just sincerely wondering how that would make her feel.
Where have I laughed at Christians for their faith?
Where have I laughed at Christians for their faith?
Faith
fāTH
noun:
- strong belief in God or in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual apprehension rather than proof.
You are the one who has stated quite clearly that evolution would disprove design.
Why is IC supposed evidence of design? Because IC systems can not evolve? Isn't that what you are pushing?
No not at all. I am "pushing" that evolution is not a mindless, unguided, unplanned process with no goals or purpose.
Prove it.
No not at all. I am "pushing" that evolution is not a mindless, unguided, unplanned process with no goals or purpose.
You have quite clearly stated that IC systems can not evolve, therefore they had to be designed.
Are you now saying that IC systems can evolve. Are you saying that the bacterial flagellum can evolve?
You are the one claiming that God is part of evolution. The burden of proof is on you.
I am saying that it hasn't been shown to have evolved, although I have been reading up on Matzke's research and it seems perhaps plausible. I haven't made any conclusions from it as of yet.
If you feel that any science specifically out to do that is pseudo-science. So on one hand you want proof and no secular scientist will go about doing that (at least by intent) and the other you dismiss as unscientific.
Then why do you cite IC systems as evidence for design?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?