See, this is impotent, not omnipotent. This is a limited god. An omnipotent god could make all of us understand, with clear cut evidence. Or just send in Jesus, he spoke to Paul why not us?
The God of the creationist
is a limited, simpleton version of That Being Than Which None Greater Can Be Conceived.
It is necessary to bottle god into a simple kool-aid version because the god concept for the Creationist is predicated on a simplistic superstition from the Bronze Age or earlier. Crafted by people who knew no more about geology or biology or science than was absolutely necessary simply to live in the highlands of Caanan and eke out a living.
So, since the Creationists here, cling to the writings which essentially
froze their god concept in a time of humanity's scientific childhood, we get YEC's and Creationists.
It is an interesting thing to see, considering that much of the Church throughout the intervening millenia has actually developed a much more subtle and nuanced form of the God Concept. The Creationist God is a god for children. The Church has grown up and matured, but Creationists still hide under the covers in their onesies talking about a simpler god, a tribal god, a magical man in the sky who can do whatever he wants whenever he wants "just becuz".
I have always been saddened that my country seems to be a central locale for this intellectually vacuous version of faith. I'm no longer religious, but I still find religions that
try to pursue a life of the mind to be much more exciting and respectable.
The creationist god is about as simple as you can get. Yet if you try to question this simple god, the creationist will usually retreat to a stance of "You can't understand the wonder-working infathomable God!" Never realizing that if no one can understand God, then they can't understand God either.