Why do people have problems with denominations?

Redwingfan9 said:

To be fair, I've heard attacks on the concept of denominations since I became a Christian 25 years ago.

Click to expand...

Reborn1977 said:

I have been in full-time Ministry for 25 years and I have served in multiple denominations. I have nothing against the vast majority of denominations. However, the surge that we have seen in recent years of the anti-denominational mindset, the massive decrease of denominational membership, the mass closings that are going on of denominational congregations, and the huge rise in non-denominational congregations is actually a work of Christ's that actually started close to twenty years ago now, a move by Jesus to bring the church, the one church, back to what it originally was and what He founded it to be before man got his hands on it and brought such destruction to it. Many denominational groups have attempted for years to fight against this, much to their detriment and without success, but they desire to hold on to their petty differences instead of embracing the Truth of the fact that Jesus established One Christian Church.

Several denominations in an attempt to survive in a religious atmosphere that is now becoming intolerant of denominations has attempted to do so by hiding who they truly are, through what one would call rebranding. I am not trying to pick on any particular denomination but the one that is most prominent for doing this is the Baptist denomination. If you will note in the last 5 years an untold number of Baptist Churches, most of which that are not known as First Baptist Church of... , have removed the word Baptist from their name and given themselves very generic names as to appear to be, at least on the surface, non denominational. Your average church member is not aware that this is the reason for this action only ministers and pastors who are actually involved in the workings of denominations at an associational level are fully aware of what is going on. This is being done for obvious reasons, they want to survive, they want to draw new members, and they cannot do that any longer by branding themselves as a denomination.

Jesus is involved in a work through The Holy Spirit to bring the Church back to what it was originally meant to be. Before Christ returns the Christian church will come full circle, back to what it was like in the beginning.

Click to expand...

Silverback said:

For a church to say they are nondenominational means they are a denomination unto themselves.

Click to expand...

NothingIsImpossible said:

I've been to a few non-denom churches. One was essentially baptist, the other was essentially charasmatic. So it kind of made the ND pointless. However our current church, which is one we used to go to about two decades ago, isn't truly non-denom. They go by the bible only. No leanings towards anything. They teach the bible and don't put words that aren't in it. Such as "What this is REALLY saying is <insert denom leaning view>."

And because of this there are many types of people in the church with varying view. Many from other churches that had strong denom ties. We pretty much all get along despite where we came from/how we were taught. The pastor is open to anyone asking him questions or making any corrections they think he needs to hear. Though it doesn't mean he just changes his views. He will study and see if what they said is biblical.

Of course he still has to be safe with some things. For example one of the church members was "found dead". And it does appear to be suicide. However the pastor and elders will not comment on it and say no matter how he died, we shouldn't be focused on that but instead on praying for the family. He knows some members have views that will start conflict about if suicide is a sin and if it a hell bound thing or a heaven bound thing.

But as many stated, many of these non-denom churches come from a certain dom to begin with. Which makes me think they should just be called what they were to begin with.

The church we went to before this one we really enjoyed. It was a non-denom to. But about one year into it the pastor made an announcement one day that they would be joining some baptist chain of churches. He claimed it would not change the teachings of the church. But many left after that day. And more left week after week as they did start making changes. Currently the church only has about maybe 35% of its congregation left.

Click to expand...

Sabertooth said:

If it takes a position on

• Original sin,
• Infant baptism,
• OSAS,
• Contemporary charismata,
• Free-will/Pre-destination,
• and many more;

it has the traits of a denomination.

Click to expand...

Jonaitis said:

Ironically, many of those same churches have their own theology problems.

Click to expand...

Sketcher said:

There are pluses and minuses to denominational churches in general, but I wouldn't call a denomination inherently bad just because it's a denomination. Whether any church is worthwhile to go to, denominational or not, depends on its teaching and its people.

Click to expand...