Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Many would do it out of fear, but you can't fool God.It is my hope that every human is given one last chance a split second before they die to change their heart and mind and accept the truth. This is a weird concept because it would mean those in the process of commiting suicide bombing could go to heaven. (speaking as a christian that is)
vajradhara said:Namaste Kyle,
thank you for the intelligent post.
i shall offer this as my first rebuttal statement:
"... for you know that the testing of your faith produces steadfastness." (James 1:3; RSV)
Unlike Paul's faith without works, faith's tests must be met, and it can only be met by action. Even to continue in a righteous path of religious exercise one must do so by action. James proceeds to God's answer to prayer, in much the same light as Jesus did. When one approaches God one must be of an absolute belief that it will come to pass.
"If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God who gives to all men generously and without reproaching, and it will be given him. But let him ask in faith, with no doubting, for he who doubts is like a wave of the sea that is driven and tossed by the wind." (James 1:5-6; RSV)
Faith alone is not sufficient, prayer is in evidence, and that without doubt or hesitation. When Jesus explained to us the gifts of the Father, he expressed himself in common, easily understood metaphors. Seek, knock, ask... but without doubt, without a faltering heart. That is putting faith into action.
If Paul's way is to be followed, one must ask why we are constantly tested. If Paul's way is to be followed, why are we told that we are never given a cross greater than we can bear? If Paul's way is to be followed, then Job is an example to no one.
"Blessed is the man who endures trial, for when he has stood the test he will receive the crown of life which God has promised to those who love him." (James 1:12; RSV)
By interpreter's standards, vs. 17, is obscure "The terminology in the remainder of vs. 17 is almost hopelessly obscure and the textual evidence equally so." (The Interpreter's Bible; Volume 12: Page 29)
But it is plain enough when read in context with the entire subject of this part of the letter.
"Every good endowment and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of Lights with whom there is no variation or shadow due to change." (James 1:17; RSV)
God is steadfast, there is no change in God's person or action. There are no hidden motives, nothing in the 'shadow' of darkness to be revealed later, i.e., there is no deception in God. The Lord God has no human failings, no hypocrisy.
The difficulty is, as in other places in the Greek testaments and as opposed to the criticism of the Old Testament, that those involved are prejudiced. They are biased in their handling of the New Testament and do everything possible, legitimate or not, to uphold to an erroneous tradition. But, the truth be known, they have no choice.
This is the major reason that they continue to applaud Paul even when he has been proven wrong, not by this student, but by his own peers. Luke is an excellent example of the distortion he raises in his efforts to prove his superiority and his authority.
Again, the theologians of our time refer to James' writing as 'Christian', but note that, it is more akin to Judaism rather than Christianity. (The use of the term, the righteousness of God, is basically Jewish, and certainly not Pauline!) (The Interpreter's Bible; Volume 12: Page 31)
At this point, the author begins to take Paul to task. This must be repeated in its entirety.
"But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves... But he who looks into the perfect law, the law of liberty, and perseveres, being no hearer that forgets but a doer that acts, he shall be blessed in his doing." (James 1:22-25; RSV)
The author of James also continues a path that seems to place the rich in a very bad light. He speaks of honoring the widow, and the orphan, and the poor man.
"Religion that is pure and undefiled before God and the Father is this; to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained in the world." (James 1: 27; RSV)
"Is it not the rich who oppress you, is it not they who drag you into court? Is it not they who blaspheme that honorable name by which you are called?" (James 2:6-7; RSV)
James raises the inevitable question.
"What does it profit, my brethren, if a man says he has faith but has not works? Can his faith save him?... So faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead." (James 2:14-17; RSV)
This is a direct answer to Paul's irreconcilable, 'faith alone'. It refutes the Gospel that Paul perpetrated in the first days of the church and brings to us this very day. It is the stand of the Catholic church as it seeks reconciliation in the eyes of Protestant Christianity, bringing this same worthless message in an attempt to bind up a dying religion.
"But some one will say, "You have faith and I have works." Show me your faith apart from your works, and I by my works will show you my faith." (James 2:18; RSV)
It is impossible to prove Paul's stand other than by admitting action, as God states in His Holy Scriptures. To say that you have faith, or that you believe something, without acting on that statement proves nothing. Paul is playing word games. (The Interpreter's Bible; Volume 12: Page 43)
if you're interested, i'm happy to point out and explain the areas where i believe that Paul is teaching the things that i'm asserting about him...
"... our sufficiency is from God, who has qualified us to be ministers of a new covenant, not in a written code but in the Spirit; for the written code kills, but the Spirit gives life." (II Corinthians 3:5-6; RSV)
The written code is the Law of Moses. Paul states that it kills. Yet Jesus says that He came to fulfill the Law and that not one iota of it would be discarded.
"Now if the dispensation of death, carved in letters of stone, came with such splendor that the Israelites could not look at Moses' face because of its brightness, fading as this was.... Indeed, in this case, what once had splendor has come to have no splendor at all... Since we have such a hope, we are very bold, not like Moses, who put a veil over his face so that the Israelites might not see the end of the fading splendor." (II Corinthians 3:7-13; RSV)
The least of all students knows that Paul has misused God's Holy Scripture here. This is not what the story in Exodus relates to us, nor is the meaning that Paul gives to it the truth. Moses' face was lit with a light that came from speaking with God! The 'dispensation of death' Paul speaks of is the, Ten Commandments, and he dares to say that it is fading, that God's work is temporary and incomplete? Those are his words, it must be his intent.
By, The Law, Paul means not only the ceremonial functions, but the entire legal canon established by the Pentateuch and embodied in Judaism. (The Interpreter's Bible; Volume 10: Page 307)
Whether we agree with Paul, or not, the fact is that he put down the Law of God, and that premise is also understood by Christian scholars.
There are, as you might imagine, many instances in Acts that refute Paul.. heck, Paul goes so far as to contradict himself 4 times... all related to his "vision" where he decided that he was a Nazerite, an Apostle.
jeffthefinn said:What about the ancient Greeks or Celts? Are they now burning in hell?
Jeff the Finn
I don't think he did. If there is a God, I am behaving in the way he created me to be. Nor do I think the created owes anything to the creator, just as lab rats have no obligation to obey or love the scientist who is experimenting on them.Take up the Cross said:God's attitude is nothing but love towards you. He wants you to be with Him. Why do you think He died in excruciating pain for you on the Cross?
Nathan David said:I don't think he did. If there is a God, I am behaving in the way he created me to be. Nor do I think the created owes anything to the creator, just as lab rats have no obligation to obey or love the scientist who is experimenting on them.
Karl - Liberal Backslider said:Hmmm....
I've addressed this question on my website. This is what I think:
"Salvation only for Christians
This comes from an image of God as unable to let anyone into heaven unless they sign on the doctrinal dotted line. But it is not what the Bible says! Firstly, it is clear that God is looking for reasons to save, not to condemn, any given person:
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.
How can it be otherwise, if God loves people? Jesus statement I am the way, the truth and the life. No-one comes to the Father except through me is often quoted in this regard. But we must look at this in the context of Johns gospel (where the saying occurs), which has, at its opening:
John 1:9
The true light that gives light to every man was coming into the world.
Lights every man - Not just those who believe a particular set of propositions. But wherever folk are enlightened to what is right and good, it is this Light who enlightens them. And when they follow that enlightenment, they follow that Light.
John goes on to talk about salvation and judgement in these terms:
John 3:19-21
This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of the light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God.
Yes, access to God is through this Person, but we do not have to know His name. Jesus' claims of exclucivisity are correct; He and He alone is the reconciler between God and Man. But it is a far cry from that to saying that anyone who doesn't 'become a Christian' and sign on the correct dotted line is doomed to Hell. It is our attitude to the Light, to Grace and Truth, to Right and Wrong that matters. This is not salvation by works; it is not by doing the right things that God accepts us, but rather by our attitude - do we turn away from, or receive, the Light?"
How about the Muslim that refuses to convert because his family was slaughtered by Christian crusaders... does he go to Hell too?Take up the Cross said:'Accepting Jesus' is not some whimsical decision, but a result of the conviction of the Spirit, repenting, and throwing yourself at Jesus' feet. We are given grace to respond, and whether or not we do decides if we get more grace, leading to salvation. We cannot be so liberal as to allow the 'anonymous Christian' to be true anywhere. A Buddhist, a Muslim, who has openly rejected the Gospel of Christ is not somehow counted among His as Christians.
humblejoe said:How about the Muslim that refuses to convert because his family was slaughtered by Christian crusaders... does he go to Hell too?
Take up the Cross said:C.S. Lewis' mother died when he was very young; he blamed God and became an atheist for a long time. He came to Christ.
A friend of mine that comes from an unbelieving, broken family came to Christ.
And most of all, Paul, who was a full-fledged, Christian-persecuting Jew came to Christ. He hated Christians for many reasons, and put many to death. But he repented and believed unto Christ.
Why look for endless amounts of 'exceptions' ? What good does that do? Why not just trust in Jesus Christ and preach His Word as He commanded, and truth Him to do the rest. He is no dummy - He is just, and in control.
Kyle
I disagree.humblejoe... you must accept that, for the Christian, everyone else is going to hell, regardless of religious affiliation or lack thereof. there is no "interpetation" in this regard.
vajradhara said:what if... in his zeal to destroy Chrisitans, Saul simply pretended to be a Christian and then propogated his own beliefs... to undermine the true Ministry of Jesus? that would neatly explain the discrepencies between his statments and those of James and Luke. it would also explain how logos and all those other greek philosophical ideas became inbedded in Christianity.
humblejoe... you must accept that, for the Christian, everyone else is going to hell, regardless of religious affiliation or lack thereof. there is no "interpetation" in this regard.
jeffthefinn said:Wow, all of this talk about the just God, if He were just then all of us without exception would be going to hell. But Our Lord Jesus showed us that God is in fact merciful, and so He is.
I disagree.
Jeff the Finn
Take up the Cross said:I'll repeat myself in that I see no discrepancies in the Word of God. Your suppositions are just that - suppositions.
Being Christian is NOT about 'religious affiliation!!!' You do not seem to see the extremity of prostrating yourself before Christ, throwing it all at His feet to save you, knowing you cannot do anything. You call this 'religious affiliation'?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?