crystalpc
Veteran
- Jan 11, 2004
- 1,364
- 42
- 79
- Faith
- Pentecostal
- Marital Status
- Politics
- US-Constitution
True, Potter, they did accuse him of breaking the law, but however, they didn't deny his power to heal. They did say the power was of satan! But they didn't deny he had the power to heal! They never questioned his power, only his methods and timing. We now want to spiritualize it in the opposite. We admit he has power to forgive sins, but question if it is his will to heal the physical condition of his children! Is it easier to tell some poor lost soul their sins are forgiven, or that they are healed? I would say the first, because the second demands a physical manifestation, whereas the first is unseen in the temporal world.PottersClay said:Yes they did. They criticized Him for healing on the Sabbath. They accused Him of using satan's power to heal.
Never once did Jesus stop anyone who came for healing, and say I don't know if I can, it may not be God's will to heal you. The only one he questioned was the gentile woman, who whined after him. He called her a dog, it is not fit to give the children's bread to dogs. This stopped her whining, and in her anger enough faith was released to admit she wasn't a jew, but was begging as a little dog for crumbs from the children's table.
Bread is the least substance that sustains life, nothing fancy just what is due them by a caring Father. Healing is the very bread of the children. It belongs to them.
Upvote
0