- May 21, 2019
- 26
- 41
- 42
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Why did our redeemer need to be fully God?
As well as being fully human?
As well as being fully human?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So much time had passed, that if it was possible with a regular human - it would have already been done.Why did our redeemer need to be fully God?
As well as being fully human?
Why did our redeemer need to be fully God?
As well as being fully human?
Why did our redeemer need to be fully God?
As well as being fully human?
So that Christians could receive God's life, as was intended in the Garden of Eden. Adam was good, but only had natural life. God's will was that Adam should be completed with spiritual life as represented by the tree of Life in Eden. Adam blew it, as we know. Lord Jesus gives us another opportunity to receive Him and so enjoy eternal life.Why did our redeemer need to be fully God?
As well as being fully human?
What thrills me, had Adam not sinned, we would have only his imputed human righteousness. But since Christ imputed HIS (God's) righteousness to believers, we are considered as righteous as God.So that Christians could receive God's life, as was intended in the Garden of Eden. Adam was good, but only had natural life. God's will was that Adam should be completed with spiritual life as represented by the tree of Life in Eden. Adam blew it, as we know. Lord Jesus gives us another opportunity to receive Him and so enjoy eternal life.
Why did our redeemer need to be fully God?
As well as being fully human?
I was listening to a Voddie Baucham teaching last night and he was speaking on the topic of salvation, and the way he said it struck me when he said, "if you could lose your salvation then you would" (A statement he said he took from John MacArthur (? spelling) ).
A cleaver quip to be sure - but does it fit the Bible facts? for example is it at all logical to quip "if an Angel could fall -- then they would all fall" make sense given that we know only some of them fell... not all of them?
Cleaver quips are not a good substitute for sola scriptura testing.
Sometimes MacArthur tosses out a "cleaver quip" without making the Bible case to make it stick. No text says "if you could fall ... you would" and that is irrefutable.
By contrast we DO have Bible texts warning us not to fall.
Matt 18 "forgiveness revoked"
32 Then his master, after he had called him, said to him, ‘You wicked servant! I forgave you all that debt because you begged me. 33 Should you not also have had compassion on your fellow servant, just as I had pity on you?’ 34 And his master was angry, and delivered him to the torturers until he should pay all that was due to him.
35 “So My heavenly Father also will do to you if each of you, from his heart, does not forgive his brother his trespasses.”
Rom 11
13 But I am speaking to you who are Gentiles. Therefore insofar as I am an apostle of Gentiles, I magnify my ministry 14 if somehow I may move my own people to jealousy and save some of them. 15 For if their rejection proves to be the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance be but life from the dead? 16 If the first piece of dough is holy, the lump is also; and if the root is holy, the branches are as well. 17 But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, being a wild olive, were grafted in among them and became partaker with them of the rich root of the olive tree, 18 do not be arrogant toward the branches; but if you are arrogant, remember that it is not you who supports the root, but the root supports you. 19 You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.” 20 Quite right, they were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear; 21 for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either. 22 See then the kindness and severity of God: to those who fell, severity, but to you, God’s kindness, if you continue in His kindness; for otherwise you too will be cut off. 23 And they also, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in; for God is able to graft them in again.
1 Cor 9
23 I do all things for the sake of the gospel, so that I may become a fellow partaker of it.
24 Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but only one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may win. 25 Everyone who competes in the games exercises self-control in all things. So they do it to obtain a perishable wreath, but we an imperishable. 26 Therefore I run in such a way as not to run aimlessly; I box in such a way, as to avoid hitting air; 27 But I discipline my body and bring it into subjection, lest, when I have preached the Gospel to others, I myself should become disqualified from it.
MacArthur's "cleaver quip" is in direct contradiction to the warnings in the Bible regarding the very thing MacArthur's quip claims is "not possible". It would be as if we were "warned" in the Bible "don't jump up in the air so high... that the sun will singe the top of your hair" -- the fact is that the Bible does not engage in repeated and resounding nonsensical warnings against what cannot possibly ever happen.
I was listening to a Voddie Baucham teaching last night and he was speaking on the topic of salvation, and the way he said it struck me when he said, "if you could lose your salvation then you would" (A statement he said he took from John MacArthur (? spelling) ). He went on to ask the rhetorical question, "How arrogant do you have to be to think there's a possibility that you could lose your salvation but you haven't?"
My post was in response to the OP who wanted to know why Jesus - being God in the flesh - was necessary to salvation.
Certainly it seems, my points were lost to you, .
your seeming to express the thought process that mankind can simply pull themselves up by their bootstraps and follow the law perfectly and rise from their own graves - no Savior necessary
e my comments related to the fact that sinless perfection isn't found in fallen man,
Why did our redeemer need to be fully God?
As well as being fully human?
Let no one weep for his iniquities, for pardon has shown forth from the grave.
Let no one fear death, for the Savior’s death has set us free.
Why did our redeemer need to be fully God?
As well as being fully human?