• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why did God make Different Aged Rocks

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
39
London
✟37,512.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
In this dispensation, yes; but not in the first dispensation, which started out with even time not existing.

Ah, is this the latest invented workaround for the obvious problem of history in everything that's had age embedded into it?
 
Upvote 0

Tomatoman

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2010
1,338
51
✟1,829.00
Faith
Anglican
Spacewyrm.
Originally Posted by AV1611VET
If they had a history, they would be omphalos.

  • omphalos = maturity with history
  • embedded age = maturity without history

Actually, this is not true. Omphalos is also maturity without history.
AV would do well to learn this.

AV:
[The lack of] time is what falsifies the idea that Adam had a past.

It is also what falsifies the idea that the earth had a history.
Adam can't be denied a past and expect to have an adult mind. The human brain doesn't work like that. He either had the one day old mind of a baby or he had a lifetime of memories and experience. It's one or the other. You can't get round it.

It's amazing that AV actually thinks embedded age might be true. If he even does that is. I don't really think any of his beliefs are very real to him, if they were he would examine them more critically. It's all a game to him. Rather like his counting threads. His religion seems to be more of a comfort blanket that he should have grown out of but never has. Therefore arguing with him about it in the hope of changing his mind is pointless. He wants his comfort blanket and that's that.
 
Upvote 0

BananaSlug

Life is an experiment, experience it!
Aug 26, 2005
2,454
106
41
In a House
✟25,782.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Spacewyrm.
AV would do well to learn this.

AV:
Adam can't be denied a past and expect to have an adult mind. The human brain doesn't work like that. He either had the one day old mind of a baby or he had a lifetime of memories and experience. It's one or the other. You can't get round it.

It's amazing that AV actually thinks embedded age might be true. If he even does that is. I don't really think any of his beliefs are very real to him, if they were he would examine them more critically. It's all a game to him. Rather like his counting threads. His religion seems to be more of a comfort blanket that he should have grown out of but never has. Therefore arguing with him about it in the hope of changing his mind is pointless. He wants his comfort blanket and that's that.

God could have programmed Adam to be able to walk and talk, but that gets into Adam having a lack of free will because he couldn't choose what he knew.
 
Upvote 0

sandwiches

Mas sabe el diablo por viejo que por diablo.
Jun 16, 2009
6,104
124
46
Dallas, Texas
✟29,530.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
God could have programmed Adam to be able to walk and talk, but that gets into Adam having a lack of free will because he couldn't choose what he knew.

Well, talking and walking require specific knowledge and even anatomy. So, his anatomy had to be that of a human who could walk and talk. So, just the mere fact that his body was that of a 30-something-year-old, indicates a history.
 
Upvote 0

driewerf

a day at the Zoo
Mar 7, 2010
3,434
1,961
✟267,108.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Embedded age is 'maturity without history' -- it's that simple.

Can God create a stale loaf of bread tomorrow?
Look, boy. I'll be straight and clear.
Your embedded age is rubish.
It' just a lamentable ad hoc hypothesis wich only reason of existence is to try to save an erronous reading of the bible. And ad hoc hypotesises are very often a sign of sloppy thinking.

Your bible is wrong about nearly everthing is says that we can check. That's not surprising: it was written by bronze age people from the Middle East. Not surprisingly it contains nothing that doesn't belong to their world view: no mentionning of any country outside the Middle east, no mentionning of any plant or animal outside the Middle East.

Your embedded age "theory" is just made up for saving your bible, though it fails abyssimally. There is no way to verify your claims, so there is no single reason to spend more time on it. You have had your opportunity, you failed.

Now, good bye sir.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,788
52,545
Guam
✟5,137,765.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So, just the mere fact that his body was that of a 30-something-year-old, indicates a history.
There can be no history without the passage of time -- and no time passed.

Adam came on the scene at the speed of God's will.
 
Upvote 0

sandwiches

Mas sabe el diablo por viejo que por diablo.
Jun 16, 2009
6,104
124
46
Dallas, Texas
✟29,530.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
There can be no history without the passage of time -- and no time passed.

Adam came on the scene at the speed of God's will.
There doesn't need to be passage of time when God is involved. When God created Adam as a 30-something-year-old, by that act, he imbued Adam with at least apparent history.
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,888
17,790
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟457,856.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Look, boy. I'll be straight and clear.
Your embedded age is rubish.
It' just a lamentable ad hoc hypothesis wich only reason of existence is to try to save an erronous reading of the bible. And ad hoc hypotesises are very often a sign of sloppy thinking.

Your bible is wrong about nearly everthing is says that we can check. That's not surprising: it was written by bronze age people from the Middle East. Not surprisingly it contains nothing that doesn't belong to their world view: no mentionning of any country outside the Middle east, no mentionning of any plant or animal outside the Middle East.

Your embedded age "theory" is just made up for saving your bible, though it fails abyssimally. There is no way to verify your claims, so there is no single reason to spend more time on it. You have had your opportunity, you failed.

Now, good bye sir.

How do you rep a post twice :D :clap:
 
Upvote 0

Tomatoman

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2010
1,338
51
✟1,829.00
Faith
Anglican
[FONT=&quot]sandwiches:
There doesn't need to be passage of time when God is involved. When God created Adam as a 30-something-year-old, by that act, he imbued Adam with at least apparent history.
And this is where AV runs into an insoluble problem. If adam is given a history that never happened, what is adam actually remembering? It doesn't make sense. And as Bananaslug pointed out, if adam is completely made by god, with his mind and everything in his mind made by god, where does that leave freewill? You have to live and learn and grow and experience by yourself in order to become you, and make the sort of decisions that you would make. There isn't any other way of doing it. AV just ignores this.

[/FONT]
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Tomatoman

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2010
1,338
51
✟1,829.00
Faith
Anglican
pgp_protector:
Originally Posted by driewerf
Look, boy. I'll be straight and clear.
Your embedded age is rubish.
It' just a lamentable ad hoc hypothesis wich only reason of existence is to try to save an erronous reading of the bible. And ad hoc hypotesises are very often a sign of sloppy thinking.

Your bible is wrong about nearly everthing is says that we can check. That's not surprising: it was written by bronze age people from the Middle East. Not surprisingly it contains nothing that doesn't belong to their world view: no mentionning of any country outside the Middle east, no mentionning of any plant or animal outside the Middle East.

Your embedded age "theory" is just made up for saving your bible, though it fails abyssimally. There is no way to verify your claims, so there is no single reason to spend more time on it. You have had your opportunity, you failed.

Now, good bye sir.
How do you rep a post twice
biggrin.gif
clap.gif

driewerf has said what many of us have been thinking.
 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
Look, boy. I'll be straight and clear.
Your embedded age is rubish.
It' just a lamentable ad hoc hypothesis wich only reason of existence is to try to save an erronous reading of the bible. And ad hoc hypotesises are very often a sign of sloppy thinking.

Your bible is wrong about nearly everthing is says that we can check. That's not surprising: it was written by bronze age people from the Middle East. Not surprisingly it contains nothing that doesn't belong to their world view: no mentionning of any country outside the Middle east, no mentionning of any plant or animal outside the Middle East.

Your embedded age "theory" is just made up for saving your bible, though it fails abyssimally. There is no way to verify your claims, so there is no single reason to spend more time on it. You have had your opportunity, you failed.

Now, good bye sir.


Agree with the above.

If I may add a thought, it is that I dont myself have much use for the middle east; their cultures, politics, food, religion, any of it.

i dont get it why anyone outside of the middle east would decide to adopt their culture as if it were their own, buy into it and then defend it as if it were their own. its not about them. Its not their history, not their culture, not their story.

Not anymore than Ward Churchill was really an Indian. (that ex-professor from colorado who made himself famous for his 'little eichmann" remarks after 911, and who was subsequently fired for falsifying research and plagiarism)
 
Upvote 0

Spacewyrm

cognitive dissident
Oct 21, 2009
248
10
California
✟22,932.00
Faith
Deist
God could have programmed Adam to be able to walk and talk, but that gets into Adam having a lack of free will because he couldn't choose what he knew.

I don't think there's really much of a problem with Adam lacking the ability to choose what he knows in this case. Free will only really means something after you come into existence and are able to make choices. Nobody chooses the way in which they come into this world.
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No, God could do it but if he did he would be deceiving. Age implies the passage of time. The passage of time is history.
I think embedded age mixed with embedded time eliminates the need for history.

But that's just my opinion. :)
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
God would be deceptive, or the bread -- interpreted in line with how bread should arrive (i.e. fresh) -- would be deceptive?
I'm very impressed by this question.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
39
London
✟37,512.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Thank you, bro! :)

Too bad they can't impress us with the answer, eh? ;)

It was already answered, by Bananaslug.

God would be the deceiver.

Not sure why you're wanting to attribute deception to the objects with age embedded in them now - perhaps you should just abandon this idea of embedding age in order to stop tying yourself in knots.
 
Upvote 0