• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why critics of Ellen G. White are "splitting hairs".

Sophia7

Tall73's Wife
Site Supporter
Sep 24, 2005
12,364
456
✟84,145.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Your timeline is skewed to fit the post-shut-door Adventist perspective. James himself (see quote from him above) said that his wife's first vision was given after she had abandoned the shut door and that the vision led her to return to it. She held to the shut-door theory from the time of her first vision until sometime around 1851, and God did not correct her during all that time, while she was not laboring for the salvation of souls. The later quotes from her deny that she ever held that view, but her earlier words prove otherwise.

You have also ignored the fact that her accompanying angel in the vision quoted from above showed her that the time for sinners to repent was past. Her view at the time was not that this was a future close of probation but rather one that had already happened in 1844. The vision was wrong.

I'll look up the quotes on the law in Galatians.
 
Upvote 0

Adventist Dissident

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,389
524
Parts Unknown
✟521,032.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
i think this is the correct time line for the shut door
 
Upvote 0

Adventist Dissident

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,389
524
Parts Unknown
✟521,032.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
and the final piece, what say ye to this





Quote:
Originally Posted by icedragon101

After 1851 The Shut Door Doctrine Disappears

The shut door teaching--which Mrs. White claimed was a part of the Testimony of Jesus--was reinterpreted by the Whites to mean that only those who rejected the 1844 message had the door of probation shut on them. After 1851 the shut door teaching--one of the central doctrines of the early Adventists--disappeared quickly from their writings. Nearly all new Adventists never heard of it nor knew that their prophet had seen it in vision.


http://www.ellenwhite.org/chrono.htm
 
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,234
512
✟556,128.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You know, this is great, if you try to go over these issues in church, from somewhere one of the little old ladies will appear and tell you to leave Mrs White alone. But we must remember to be reverent with everything divine, and 'thread' softly and remember what happened to the boys that taunted one of Gods prophets......


2 Kings 2:1-25


1And it came to pass, when the LORD would take up Elijah into heaven by a whirlwind, that Elijah went with Elisha from Gilgal.
2And Elijah said unto Elisha, Tarry here, I pray thee; for the LORD hath sent me to Bethel. And Elisha said unto him, As the LORD liveth, and as thy soul liveth, I will not leave thee. So they went down to Bethel.
3And the sons of the prophets that were at Bethel came forth to Elisha, and said unto him, Knowest thou that the LORD will take away thy master from thy head to day? And he said, Yea, I know it; hold ye your peace.
4And Elijah said unto him, Elisha, tarry here, I pray thee; for the LORD hath sent me to Jericho. And he said, As the LORD liveth, and as thy soul liveth, I will not leave thee. So they came to Jericho.
5And the sons of the prophets that were at Jericho came to Elisha, and said unto him, Knowest thou that the LORD will take away thy master from thy head to day? And he answered, Yea, I know it; hold ye your peace.
6And Elijah said unto him, Tarry, I pray thee, here; for the LORD hath sent me to Jordan. And he said, As the LORD liveth, and as thy soul liveth, I will not leave thee. And they two went on.
7And fifty men of the sons of the prophets went, and stood to view afar off: and they two stood by Jordan.
8And Elijah took his mantle, and wrapped it together, and smote the waters, and they were divided hither and thither, so that they two went over on dry ground.
9And it came to pass, when they were gone over, that Elijah said unto Elisha, Ask what I shall do for thee, before I be taken away from thee. And Elisha said, I pray thee, let a double portion of thy spirit be upon me.
10And he said, Thou hast asked a hard thing: nevertheless, if thou see me when I am taken from thee, it shall be so unto thee; but if not, it shall not be so.
11And it came to pass, as they still went on, and talked, that, behold, there appeared a chariot of fire, and horses of fire, and parted them both asunder; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven.
12And Elisha saw it, and he cried, My father, my father, the chariot of Israel, and the horsemen thereof. And he saw him no more: and he took hold of his own clothes, and rent them in two pieces.
13He took up also the mantle of Elijah that fell from him, and went back, and stood by the bank of Jordan;
14And he took the mantle of Elijah that fell from him, and smote the waters, and said, Where is the LORD God of Elijah? and when he also had smitten the waters, they parted hither and thither: and Elisha went over.
15And when the sons of the prophets which were to view at Jericho saw him, they said, The spirit of Elijah doth rest on Elisha. And they came to meet him, and bowed themselves to the ground before him.
16And they said unto him, Behold now, there be with thy servants fifty strong men; let them go, we pray thee, and seek thy master: lest peradventure the Spirit of the LORD hath taken him up, and cast him upon some mountain, or into some valley. And he said, Ye shall not send.
17And when they urged him till he was ashamed, he said, Send. They sent therefore fifty men; and they sought three days, but found him not.
18And when they came again to him, (for he tarried at Jericho,) he said unto them, Did I not say unto you, Go not?
19And the men of the city said unto Elisha, Behold, I pray thee, the situation of this city is pleasant, as my lord seeth: but the water is naught, and the ground barren.
20And he said, Bring me a new cruse, and put salt therein. And they brought it to him.
21And he went forth unto the spring of the waters, and cast the salt in there, and said, Thus saith the LORD, I have healed these waters; there shall not be from thence any more death or barren land.
22So the waters were healed unto this day, according to the saying of Elisha which he spake.
23And he went up from thence unto Bethel: and as he was going up by the way, there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
24And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the LORD. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them. 25And he went from thence to mount Carmel, and from thence he returned to Samaria.
 
Upvote 0

Sophia7

Tall73's Wife
Site Supporter
Sep 24, 2005
12,364
456
✟84,145.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

And if she wasn't a true prophet? Then your warning is irrelevant. There is nothing wrong with testing a prophet; the Bible tells us to do that. I used to accept Ellen White as a prophet, but I'm not sure that I can anymore. I've read both sides of these issues, and I find the traditional Adventist side lacking. I didn't want to see it this way when I started studying, but I couldn't just ignore the evidence. Please address the real issues and stop writing off everyone who doesn't accept EGW unquestioningly as lost. EGW is not divine, and if her prophetic status is strong enough to hold up, it will do so even under examination.
 
Upvote 0

Adventist Dissident

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,389
524
Parts Unknown
✟521,032.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
how does post #85 contribute to the topic? We are discussing the view of the "shut door". We all believe in Elijah and Elisha. We are discussing the chronology and validity of the shut door. what say ye to that information?
 
Upvote 0
O

OntheDL

Guest

It's funny how two people reading the same quote can come to completely different understand.


The charge is not just about the shut door but the entire 1844 message and thus it questions the very legitimacy of Adventism.

The 7th month experience refers to the entire 1844 message. James White here was not writing about them return to the Millerites' shut door message, but returning to the 1844 message which God corrected their initial errors withe new light.

The years 1844 to 1851 were a time of gradual change of understanding of the true shut door message.

"It is very clear from the context of his many references to the shut door that the term in 1851 and 1852 had quite a different connotation from what it did in 1844, 1845, 1846. In the intervening years it had undergone a gradual but important change in significance.

Because the development of an understanding of the matter was gradual, statements made in retrospect put the shut door in an easily grasped setting. A knowledge of the experience of the pioneers through the years 1844 to 1851 places the question in its true light." ---1BIO 256.

"I am still a believer in the shut-door theory, but not in the sense in which we at first employed the term or in which it is employed by my opponents." ---1BIO 260
 
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,234
512
✟556,128.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
But if she is of God, then you are in need of careful consideration of how you reach your understanding, as some attack and dont see when they are fighting against God and/or his Holy Spirit.

Red
(guilty of all these flaws, so Red can barely speak)
 
Upvote 0

Adventist Dissident

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,389
524
Parts Unknown
✟521,032.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
It's funny how two people reading the same quote can come to completely different understand.



The charge is not just about the shut door but the entire 1844 message and thus it questions the very legitimacy of Adventism.
I would have to disagree with you on this one. Remember your SDA History. It was only after people studied the scripture that EGW went into vision to verify, Only AFTER. EGW did not make one doctrinal contributation, NOt the sabbath, state of the dead, sanctuary, Second coming, not salvation. All were found by others. What is at stake is the legitimacy of EGW Prophetic Gifting and her claim to be a messenger of the Lord. that is for sure and should be Tested throughly.
 
Upvote 0

Adventist Dissident

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,389
524
Parts Unknown
✟521,032.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
But if she is of God, then you are in need of careful consideration of how you reach your understanding, as some attack and dont see when they are fighting against God and/or his Holy Spirit.

Red
(guilty of all these flaws, so Red can barely speak)

Moses had to prove him self and so did Christ. Why not EGW?
 
Upvote 0
O

OntheDL

Guest

I think even Sophia will disagree with you. The 1844 message is about the legitimacy of SDA denomination.

Actually, God gave light to the collective Adventist pioneers. But He used EGW particularly to deliver the message. All others were subject to correction to the light the was given to her. On this, I think D Canright would disagree with you. And it contradicts some of your earlier statements.
 
Upvote 0

Adventist Dissident

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,389
524
Parts Unknown
✟521,032.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

could you tell me which doctrince EGW came up with? and where I contradicted my self earlier?
Miller had the second coming and the basic prophtic structure
joseph bates the sabbath
hiram edson and ORL croiser - the sanctruary doctrine
The state of the dead I do not know where it came from, but I do know that it was held by others as well. So again which one did EGW come up with, which one in particular? The basic construct of the SDA doctrine is sound, without EGW? What you are saying sounds like the SDA chruch is dependant on EGW not Jesus for it's existance.
 
Upvote 0

Sophia7

Tall73's Wife
Site Supporter
Sep 24, 2005
12,364
456
✟84,145.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Here are a few EGW quotes on the law in Galatians. (I quoted the first two previously.) In the first quote, she says that Galatians refers to the moral law as the schoolmaster that brings us to Christ, in the second to both the moral and ceremonial laws. In the third and fourth, she takes the view of the ceremonial law. I am also including some of her statements on Waggoner. There was some dispute over her views in relation to Jones and Waggoner and the 1888 controversy. The quotes also show that she couldn’t even remember what she had written to E.J. Waggoner’s father previously when she had disagreed with his views on the law in Galatians. Overall, I see this as showing that she didn't have as dogmatic a view that Galatians 3 referred to the ceremonial law as many Adventists do today. She at times seemed to support different viewpoints and at times even said that it was an unimportant issue.



EGW said:
I am asked concerning the law in Galatians. What law is the schoolmaster to bring us to Christ? I answer: Both the ceremonial and the moral code of ten commandments. {1SM 233.1}

[1900]






Also, see this article on E.J. Waggoner and 1888. Here is an excerpt:

 
Upvote 0

Adventist Dissident

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,389
524
Parts Unknown
✟521,032.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others


Good quote sophia7

I recently read "WW Prescott: the forgotten giant of Adventism 2nd generation" , by gilbert valintine. He says on page 82-83 "that Uriah smith had a hard time accepting the message not so much because of the message, but because he thought he remembered EGW opposing it in a vision in 1856, when Waggoners father brought it up. " the main problem with it was that EGW said one thing in 1856 and another in 1888. That is a huge problem. They had a hard time because of her. not because of the message. Take EGW out of this situation and there is no 1888 problem. This is the issue that finally drove DM canwright out of the Chruch. He knew about this and said I quit.
 
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,234
512
✟556,128.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Sophia, when I was young, the Hara Krishna devotees were everywhere you went, with their singing and robes, and there was all kinds of articles of the dangers of their religion taking over Protestant America. Now, I haven't seen one since I went riding with my girlfriend in my '71 Mustang Mach I with the air foil wing on the back and 8 track tape AM/FM radio, what happened to them, did they take over, I dont think so..........If she is not of God, it will be set aside and Gods truth will endure, but if she does have the message from the Holy Spirit, then nothing you do, say, give money to, make laws against will stop the truth she brings.......

But once we have understanding we must choose, as only the evil influence gains if we hold back from the Holy Spirit and its work....

"....Others are like doubting Thomas; they cannot believe the published Testimonies, nor receive evidence through the testimony of others, but must see and have the evidence for themselves. Such must not be set aside, but long patience and brotherly love should be exercised toward them until they find their position and become established for or against. If they fight against the visions, of which they have no knowledge; if they carry their opposition so far as to oppose that in which they have had no experience, and feel annoyed when those who believe that the visions are of God speak of them in meeting and comfort themselves with the instruction given through vision, the church may know that they are not right (Testimonies, vol. 1, p. 328)...."

Your brother in Christ
Red
 
Upvote 0
O

OntheDL

Guest

The first quote was alluding to the moral code of the whole law (of Moses) that leads to Jesus.

The second quote was refering to the whole law of Moses(moral code of the 10 commandments and the ceremonial).

The third and thereafter were pointing out the point of contention within the early christian church: if they should keep the ceremonial laws.

There is no contraditions if you understand the law and you are not trying to make them contraditions.
 
Upvote 0