- Dec 9, 2019
- 9,074
- 3,469
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You mean "accusing you" of having very similar posts to another member (one that happens to be banned)? That's not false - it's true. I used quotes because it's not an accusation, but an observation.
Nope. Sorry to Disappoint.Wow! So you are a Full Preterist! I and others have suspected that for a while! So sad!!! You are deceived by heresy.
Why would any Christian that has nothing to hide repeatedly ignore these simple questions?
- Is the second coming of Christ an ongoing process or a literal future physical climactic event?
- Is the resurrection of the dead an ongoing process or a literal future physical climactic event?
1) Yes
2) Yes
I reject the premise that each question is mutually exclusive.1 Is the second coming of Christ an ongoing process?
2 or a literal future physical climactic event?
3 Is the resurrection of the dead an ongoing process?
4 or a literal future physical climactic event?
We're way past the #2 coming. Some of us believe in Christophanies - like Melchizedek being an appearing of Christ. Then there're the visitors Sarah and Abraham had recorded in Genesis 18; the vision that Steven had at his stoning....the visit Saul/Paul had....the Presence of Christ whenever 2 or more are gathered in His name etc. I doubt we can even accurately know how many "coming of Christ" events there have been or can expect.Is the second coming of Christ an ongoing process?
Saying all that, having debated with Partial Preterists over the years, and most recently on this site, I have many real deep biblical concerns about Partial Preterist teaching which I believe are dangerous, and which lead many into the heresy of Full Preterism. Much of what is advocated on this board by Partial Preterists is only a thin paper wall away from Full Preterism. Partial Preterists even freely quote their writers.
Associating the resurrection with the events of Daniel 12 and the Olivet discourse is heretical?
A quick note to help this thread not to be sidetracked from the OP. I personally know SovereignGrace as well as BABerean. They are not the same person and they live many miles from each other.
Two good guys BTW.
We're way past the #2 coming. Some of us believe in Christophanies - like Melchizedek being an appearing of Christ. Then there're the visitors Sarah and Abraham had recorded in Genesis 18; the vision that Steven had at his stoning....the visit Saul/Paul had....the Presence of Christ whenever 2 or more are gathered in His name etc. I doubt we can even accurately know how many "coming of Christ" events there have been or can expect.
It was merely an observation.This is a deliberate effort by mkgal to misrepresent me and to discredit my message. Sadly, she refuses to apologize for this.
You seem to be missing my point about the assigned number.It doesn’t matter what do you think. The truth still stands solid and unwavering. You are doing your best to diminish and belittle the importance of the one final future literal physical visible audible second coming of the Lord Jesus Christ. But scripture is very clear: it is the climax of history. It is the introduction of the perfect and eternal state.
It was merely an observation.
I reject the premise that each question is mutually exclusive.
It's a yes to all 4
What are you talking about? Who’s resurrection?
It was a false accusation. I suspected with your previous record that there is no way that you were going to apologize. That is who you are.
It is heretical to associate the resurrection of the just and unjust with the events of Daniel 12 and the Olivet discourse?
I agree Hymenaean was in error. Hymenaean preached the resurrection prior to the events of Daniel 12 the olivet discourse. Thus his error was divorcing the resurrection with the events stated in Daniel 12 and the olivet discourse.
Thus anyone who dissociates the general resurrection with the events of Daniel 12 and the olivet discourse commits the error of Hymenaean.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?