Hans Blaster
On August Recess
- Mar 11, 2017
- 21,679
- 16,363
- 55
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Are we being Poe'd? I feel like we're being Poe'd.
We are not. This one is just flailing.
It must be awesome to be such an expert and know that only you have all the answers and are much more clever than others?
Remember when atheists in europe, canada, asia and australia were suckered into supporting terrible policies like open borders.
While right wing christians in the united states were smart enough to support Trump building a wall.
That's how I remember the atheist versus religion science debate going.
How about you? ^_~
Remember when atheists in europe, canada, asia and australia were suckered into supporting terrible policies like open borders.
While right wing christians in the united states were smart enough to support Trump building a wall.
That's how I remember the atheist versus religion science debate going.
How about you? ^_~
Where do I even imply that?
I was merely stating a well known fact. Creationists simply do not do science when they oppose evolution. They have no scientific evidence for their beliefs. Are you willing to learn the basics? They are not that hard to understand.
So, for me, when Science tells me that we have measured the speed of light and it is x mph. I agree. But when they then try to extrapolate that measurement back to the several thousand years to the creation event, since I ascribe that to the work of a God who performs great and unexplainable miracles, I say "hold up a minute!" Have you proved that God could not have miraculously stretched the light of the stars across the entire universe in the moment of creation? In reality, all you have proven is that light travels at a given speed...today! You have no way of knowing whether or not that 'law' was in effect at the time of the creation event. Science has no way of knowing what God did on the day that He created this realm in which we live.
Remember when atheists in europe, canada, asia and australia were suckered into supporting terrible policies like open borders.
While right wing christians in the united states were smart enough to support Trump building a wall.
That's how I remember the atheist versus religion science debate going.
How about you? ^_~
There may never have been any miracles. The burden of proof is of course upon the person making the claim that they occurred in the first place.@Subduction Zone
Personally, I'd rather know when scientists are going to be able understand what a miracle is?
You think, that because science have given you answers to questions that they can't possibly really know, that they know what they're talking about. Answer me one question: How does the scientific community explain the birth of a child from a woman who has never had sexual relations, 2000 years ago?
God bless,
Ted
You did not even cite the article that you did not understand. I am familiar with those articles. They tend to deal mainly with one specific branch of the sciences, and it is not evolution.Some studies conclude between 30% and 60% of published scientific results. Could not be reproduced.
The sad truth about the scientific method is there isn't anyone involved who is paid full time to fact check anything that is published. And so a high percentage of published science is often falsified.
That has nothing to do with the fact of evolution.Are you willing to obey God? Science isn't what it's cracked up to be.
Science is not all negatives. There are many positive confirmations of the theory of evolution. If one focuses on the negatives perhaps the fault is in the person making those observations.Well, someone has to make science interesting. You know, it gets kind of boring when everything is based on "negatives", e.g. : the only reason such and such exists is because this and that were weeded out through natural selection.
...Negativity is depressing.
How does the scientific community explain the birth of a child from a woman who has never had sexual relations, 2000 years ago?
That has nothing to do with the fact of evolution.
Whether one is willing to obey God or not has nothing to do with the error of interpreting Genesis literally. Perhaps you might want to start a thread that is not in this part of the forum.
Science is not all negatives. There are many positive confirmations of the theory of evolution. If one focuses on the negatives perhaps the fault is in the person making those observations.
And of course this has nothing to do with the scientific failure of creationists.
Are you lost?
This isn't the politics board, the culture board, the immigration board, or the "atheism is evil" board.
Creation/Evolution or get out.
Nope. Why would I want to do that? It appears that you do not know what an atheist is. And atheism has nothing to do with this thread. Most Christians accept the fact of evolution. One does not need to believe the Genesis myths to be a Christian.You might want to prove there is no god before pretending to be an atheist.
You might want to prove there is no god before pretending to be an atheist.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?